- This topic has 860 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
blake.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 28, 2009 at 3:48 PM #475720October 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM #474884
briansd1
GuestThat’s what happens when you get married.
Next time, tell her that love and trust are enough. No need for documents. 😉
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts28-2009oct28,0,3490602.story
The battle for Los Angeles’ storied baseball team hit the courts Tuesday when former Dodgers chief executive Jamie McCourt filed a divorce petition laying claim to half of the team and other assets she valued at more than $1 billion.
October 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM #475059GuestThat’s what happens when you get married.
Next time, tell her that love and trust are enough. No need for documents. 😉
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts28-2009oct28,0,3490602.story
The battle for Los Angeles’ storied baseball team hit the courts Tuesday when former Dodgers chief executive Jamie McCourt filed a divorce petition laying claim to half of the team and other assets she valued at more than $1 billion.
October 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM #475424GuestThat’s what happens when you get married.
Next time, tell her that love and trust are enough. No need for documents. 😉
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts28-2009oct28,0,3490602.story
The battle for Los Angeles’ storied baseball team hit the courts Tuesday when former Dodgers chief executive Jamie McCourt filed a divorce petition laying claim to half of the team and other assets she valued at more than $1 billion.
October 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM #475500GuestThat’s what happens when you get married.
Next time, tell her that love and trust are enough. No need for documents. 😉
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts28-2009oct28,0,3490602.story
The battle for Los Angeles’ storied baseball team hit the courts Tuesday when former Dodgers chief executive Jamie McCourt filed a divorce petition laying claim to half of the team and other assets she valued at more than $1 billion.
October 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM #475725GuestThat’s what happens when you get married.
Next time, tell her that love and trust are enough. No need for documents. 😉
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-mccourts28-2009oct28,0,3490602.story
The battle for Los Angeles’ storied baseball team hit the courts Tuesday when former Dodgers chief executive Jamie McCourt filed a divorce petition laying claim to half of the team and other assets she valued at more than $1 billion.
October 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM #474889Anonymous
GuestNo its “Punky”, like “Punky” Brewster. Remember Punky……
October 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM #475064GuestNo its “Punky”, like “Punky” Brewster. Remember Punky……
October 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM #475429GuestNo its “Punky”, like “Punky” Brewster. Remember Punky……
October 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM #475505GuestNo its “Punky”, like “Punky” Brewster. Remember Punky……
October 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM #475730GuestNo its “Punky”, like “Punky” Brewster. Remember Punky……
October 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM #474949CA renter
Participant[quote=Enorah]I feel really sad reading this thread[/quote]
Me too.
Do all the anti-marriage types here want to live in a matriarchal/matrilineal society, where men are increasingly irrelevant?
In a society without marriage, and without any payment for the work women do (essentially, creating and bringing up the next generation of people), why would any woman have a child for a man? And if a woman did choose to have a child, there would be no reason to name that child after the sperm donor or to establish a relationship between the donor and her child, as the man would only be a hindrance to her independence and ability to find new mates or move for a career, etc.
Not sure why a man would think that’s some kind of utopia.
October 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM #475124Participant[quote=Enorah]I feel really sad reading this thread[/quote]
Me too.
Do all the anti-marriage types here want to live in a matriarchal/matrilineal society, where men are increasingly irrelevant?
In a society without marriage, and without any payment for the work women do (essentially, creating and bringing up the next generation of people), why would any woman have a child for a man? And if a woman did choose to have a child, there would be no reason to name that child after the sperm donor or to establish a relationship between the donor and her child, as the man would only be a hindrance to her independence and ability to find new mates or move for a career, etc.
Not sure why a man would think that’s some kind of utopia.
October 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM #475489Participant[quote=Enorah]I feel really sad reading this thread[/quote]
Me too.
Do all the anti-marriage types here want to live in a matriarchal/matrilineal society, where men are increasingly irrelevant?
In a society without marriage, and without any payment for the work women do (essentially, creating and bringing up the next generation of people), why would any woman have a child for a man? And if a woman did choose to have a child, there would be no reason to name that child after the sperm donor or to establish a relationship between the donor and her child, as the man would only be a hindrance to her independence and ability to find new mates or move for a career, etc.
Not sure why a man would think that’s some kind of utopia.
October 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM #475565Participant[quote=Enorah]I feel really sad reading this thread[/quote]
Me too.
Do all the anti-marriage types here want to live in a matriarchal/matrilineal society, where men are increasingly irrelevant?
In a society without marriage, and without any payment for the work women do (essentially, creating and bringing up the next generation of people), why would any woman have a child for a man? And if a woman did choose to have a child, there would be no reason to name that child after the sperm donor or to establish a relationship between the donor and her child, as the man would only be a hindrance to her independence and ability to find new mates or move for a career, etc.
Not sure why a man would think that’s some kind of utopia.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.