- This topic has 860 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by blake.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 28, 2009 at 10:56 PM #475937October 28, 2009 at 10:59 PM #475106sdrealtorParticipant
CAR
The problem with your argument is that the vast majority of divorces involve the wife bailing not vice versa.October 28, 2009 at 10:59 PM #475282sdrealtorParticipantCAR
The problem with your argument is that the vast majority of divorces involve the wife bailing not vice versa.October 28, 2009 at 10:59 PM #475646sdrealtorParticipantCAR
The problem with your argument is that the vast majority of divorces involve the wife bailing not vice versa.October 28, 2009 at 10:59 PM #475723sdrealtorParticipantCAR
The problem with your argument is that the vast majority of divorces involve the wife bailing not vice versa.October 28, 2009 at 10:59 PM #475947sdrealtorParticipantCAR
The problem with your argument is that the vast majority of divorces involve the wife bailing not vice versa.October 28, 2009 at 11:03 PM #475111scaredyclassicParticipantperhaps if there weren’t a marriage tax penalty, but instead a marriage incentive, maybe a marriage tax credit, people could at least say, well, honey, we do get a deduction for this even when things are bleak. I suggest $8,000 the first year, with $500 extra credit per year of marriage. Suspend the homebuyer tax credit.
October 28, 2009 at 11:03 PM #475287scaredyclassicParticipantperhaps if there weren’t a marriage tax penalty, but instead a marriage incentive, maybe a marriage tax credit, people could at least say, well, honey, we do get a deduction for this even when things are bleak. I suggest $8,000 the first year, with $500 extra credit per year of marriage. Suspend the homebuyer tax credit.
October 28, 2009 at 11:03 PM #475651scaredyclassicParticipantperhaps if there weren’t a marriage tax penalty, but instead a marriage incentive, maybe a marriage tax credit, people could at least say, well, honey, we do get a deduction for this even when things are bleak. I suggest $8,000 the first year, with $500 extra credit per year of marriage. Suspend the homebuyer tax credit.
October 28, 2009 at 11:03 PM #475728scaredyclassicParticipantperhaps if there weren’t a marriage tax penalty, but instead a marriage incentive, maybe a marriage tax credit, people could at least say, well, honey, we do get a deduction for this even when things are bleak. I suggest $8,000 the first year, with $500 extra credit per year of marriage. Suspend the homebuyer tax credit.
October 28, 2009 at 11:03 PM #475952scaredyclassicParticipantperhaps if there weren’t a marriage tax penalty, but instead a marriage incentive, maybe a marriage tax credit, people could at least say, well, honey, we do get a deduction for this even when things are bleak. I suggest $8,000 the first year, with $500 extra credit per year of marriage. Suspend the homebuyer tax credit.
October 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM #475117RicechexParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Thanks ricechex….
Reading some of the posts does in fact bring me back to like… oh maybe jr high school and when I would get rejected I would act in such a manner.
Your analysis was spot on. The funny thing is that one reads some of the posts, and these posts try to point out that it is a “them” problem. The man will say women do this, or women do that, or they turn men into this or that. In reality it is not a “them” problem, it is a “you” problem.
Rice I wish I was one of those guys who got the pick of the women, but I was just another scrapper guy like the rest of them. However one thing I have noticed is that I know alot of “those guys”. These are the guys that have “it”. Whether it is physical looks, or money or whatever, women are just naturally attracted to these guys. For the most part, you NEVER here any of these guys spewing the bitterness that I have read here.
Again it is one thing to say, no thanks I would rather be single and enjoy that life. In fact those that live that life also rarely talk that harsh about women as well. They have the single life, they enjoy it, they enjoy women and that is okay.
So in summary I would classify those that speak in the bitter manner as those that feel women have something they cannot have or have a hard time getting. Thus they lash out and try to “put women in thier place”. They don’t need this or that, they won’t tolerate a woman changing them or doing this or that to them. Once again, it is not them, it is the “women” right?[/quote]
SD Realtor–no matter what you think about yourself, your wife snagged YOU. Remember the old saying “the good guys are already taken”? That was you. These are women/people that know qualities that will hold a longer time than looks and money. And, as your post demonstrates, it is about taking responsibility rather than blaming. Now, that is attractive.
October 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM #475292RicechexParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Thanks ricechex….
Reading some of the posts does in fact bring me back to like… oh maybe jr high school and when I would get rejected I would act in such a manner.
Your analysis was spot on. The funny thing is that one reads some of the posts, and these posts try to point out that it is a “them” problem. The man will say women do this, or women do that, or they turn men into this or that. In reality it is not a “them” problem, it is a “you” problem.
Rice I wish I was one of those guys who got the pick of the women, but I was just another scrapper guy like the rest of them. However one thing I have noticed is that I know alot of “those guys”. These are the guys that have “it”. Whether it is physical looks, or money or whatever, women are just naturally attracted to these guys. For the most part, you NEVER here any of these guys spewing the bitterness that I have read here.
Again it is one thing to say, no thanks I would rather be single and enjoy that life. In fact those that live that life also rarely talk that harsh about women as well. They have the single life, they enjoy it, they enjoy women and that is okay.
So in summary I would classify those that speak in the bitter manner as those that feel women have something they cannot have or have a hard time getting. Thus they lash out and try to “put women in thier place”. They don’t need this or that, they won’t tolerate a woman changing them or doing this or that to them. Once again, it is not them, it is the “women” right?[/quote]
SD Realtor–no matter what you think about yourself, your wife snagged YOU. Remember the old saying “the good guys are already taken”? That was you. These are women/people that know qualities that will hold a longer time than looks and money. And, as your post demonstrates, it is about taking responsibility rather than blaming. Now, that is attractive.
October 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM #475656RicechexParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Thanks ricechex….
Reading some of the posts does in fact bring me back to like… oh maybe jr high school and when I would get rejected I would act in such a manner.
Your analysis was spot on. The funny thing is that one reads some of the posts, and these posts try to point out that it is a “them” problem. The man will say women do this, or women do that, or they turn men into this or that. In reality it is not a “them” problem, it is a “you” problem.
Rice I wish I was one of those guys who got the pick of the women, but I was just another scrapper guy like the rest of them. However one thing I have noticed is that I know alot of “those guys”. These are the guys that have “it”. Whether it is physical looks, or money or whatever, women are just naturally attracted to these guys. For the most part, you NEVER here any of these guys spewing the bitterness that I have read here.
Again it is one thing to say, no thanks I would rather be single and enjoy that life. In fact those that live that life also rarely talk that harsh about women as well. They have the single life, they enjoy it, they enjoy women and that is okay.
So in summary I would classify those that speak in the bitter manner as those that feel women have something they cannot have or have a hard time getting. Thus they lash out and try to “put women in thier place”. They don’t need this or that, they won’t tolerate a woman changing them or doing this or that to them. Once again, it is not them, it is the “women” right?[/quote]
SD Realtor–no matter what you think about yourself, your wife snagged YOU. Remember the old saying “the good guys are already taken”? That was you. These are women/people that know qualities that will hold a longer time than looks and money. And, as your post demonstrates, it is about taking responsibility rather than blaming. Now, that is attractive.
October 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM #475733RicechexParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Thanks ricechex….
Reading some of the posts does in fact bring me back to like… oh maybe jr high school and when I would get rejected I would act in such a manner.
Your analysis was spot on. The funny thing is that one reads some of the posts, and these posts try to point out that it is a “them” problem. The man will say women do this, or women do that, or they turn men into this or that. In reality it is not a “them” problem, it is a “you” problem.
Rice I wish I was one of those guys who got the pick of the women, but I was just another scrapper guy like the rest of them. However one thing I have noticed is that I know alot of “those guys”. These are the guys that have “it”. Whether it is physical looks, or money or whatever, women are just naturally attracted to these guys. For the most part, you NEVER here any of these guys spewing the bitterness that I have read here.
Again it is one thing to say, no thanks I would rather be single and enjoy that life. In fact those that live that life also rarely talk that harsh about women as well. They have the single life, they enjoy it, they enjoy women and that is okay.
So in summary I would classify those that speak in the bitter manner as those that feel women have something they cannot have or have a hard time getting. Thus they lash out and try to “put women in thier place”. They don’t need this or that, they won’t tolerate a woman changing them or doing this or that to them. Once again, it is not them, it is the “women” right?[/quote]
SD Realtor–no matter what you think about yourself, your wife snagged YOU. Remember the old saying “the good guys are already taken”? That was you. These are women/people that know qualities that will hold a longer time than looks and money. And, as your post demonstrates, it is about taking responsibility rather than blaming. Now, that is attractive.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.