- This topic has 570 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 1, 2010 at 8:51 AM #612555October 1, 2010 at 9:28 AM #611514
meadandale
Participant[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
He’s the one who gave state employees the power of collective bargaining in the FIRST PLACE.
IMO, no government worker should ever be allowed to unionize.
October 1, 2010 at 9:28 AM #611600Participant[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
He’s the one who gave state employees the power of collective bargaining in the FIRST PLACE.
IMO, no government worker should ever be allowed to unionize.
October 1, 2010 at 9:28 AM #612149Participant[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
He’s the one who gave state employees the power of collective bargaining in the FIRST PLACE.
IMO, no government worker should ever be allowed to unionize.
October 1, 2010 at 9:28 AM #612262Participant[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
He’s the one who gave state employees the power of collective bargaining in the FIRST PLACE.
IMO, no government worker should ever be allowed to unionize.
October 1, 2010 at 9:28 AM #612575Participant[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
He’s the one who gave state employees the power of collective bargaining in the FIRST PLACE.
IMO, no government worker should ever be allowed to unionize.
October 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM #611666jpinpb
Participant[quote=gandalf]This is a stupid thread.
Who cares if Meg Whitman hired an illegal to clean her home?
[/quote]The reason this issue matters is b/c it goes to character, IMO. I think it is hypocritical. This housekeeper worked for her for 8 to 9 years. She wants employers held accountable for hiring workers who are not citizens.
Maybe this seems like a minor issue, relatively speaking. But here she is trying to get absolve herself of responsibility. So what’s going to happen when we have real issues? How will she handle that as a governor? She hasn’t even voted on issues.
I also get the impression she will be catering to big business.
[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
Yes. I think our choices are picking the worst of two evils here. I’m not impressed w/either candidate. It’s disappointing.
October 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM #611754Participant[quote=gandalf]This is a stupid thread.
Who cares if Meg Whitman hired an illegal to clean her home?
[/quote]The reason this issue matters is b/c it goes to character, IMO. I think it is hypocritical. This housekeeper worked for her for 8 to 9 years. She wants employers held accountable for hiring workers who are not citizens.
Maybe this seems like a minor issue, relatively speaking. But here she is trying to get absolve herself of responsibility. So what’s going to happen when we have real issues? How will she handle that as a governor? She hasn’t even voted on issues.
I also get the impression she will be catering to big business.
[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
Yes. I think our choices are picking the worst of two evils here. I’m not impressed w/either candidate. It’s disappointing.
October 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM #612302Participant[quote=gandalf]This is a stupid thread.
Who cares if Meg Whitman hired an illegal to clean her home?
[/quote]The reason this issue matters is b/c it goes to character, IMO. I think it is hypocritical. This housekeeper worked for her for 8 to 9 years. She wants employers held accountable for hiring workers who are not citizens.
Maybe this seems like a minor issue, relatively speaking. But here she is trying to get absolve herself of responsibility. So what’s going to happen when we have real issues? How will she handle that as a governor? She hasn’t even voted on issues.
I also get the impression she will be catering to big business.
[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
Yes. I think our choices are picking the worst of two evils here. I’m not impressed w/either candidate. It’s disappointing.
October 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM #612418Participant[quote=gandalf]This is a stupid thread.
Who cares if Meg Whitman hired an illegal to clean her home?
[/quote]The reason this issue matters is b/c it goes to character, IMO. I think it is hypocritical. This housekeeper worked for her for 8 to 9 years. She wants employers held accountable for hiring workers who are not citizens.
Maybe this seems like a minor issue, relatively speaking. But here she is trying to get absolve herself of responsibility. So what’s going to happen when we have real issues? How will she handle that as a governor? She hasn’t even voted on issues.
I also get the impression she will be catering to big business.
[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
Yes. I think our choices are picking the worst of two evils here. I’m not impressed w/either candidate. It’s disappointing.
October 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM #612730Participant[quote=gandalf]This is a stupid thread.
Who cares if Meg Whitman hired an illegal to clean her home?
[/quote]The reason this issue matters is b/c it goes to character, IMO. I think it is hypocritical. This housekeeper worked for her for 8 to 9 years. She wants employers held accountable for hiring workers who are not citizens.
Maybe this seems like a minor issue, relatively speaking. But here she is trying to get absolve herself of responsibility. So what’s going to happen when we have real issues? How will she handle that as a governor? She hasn’t even voted on issues.
I also get the impression she will be catering to big business.
[quote=paramount]I’m not happy with Meg as a choice, but Brown will do nothing at all about State Employee Unions except give them exactly what they want.[/quote]
Yes. I think our choices are picking the worst of two evils here. I’m not impressed w/either candidate. It’s disappointing.
October 1, 2010 at 6:46 PM #611676kev374
ParticipantMeg Whitman is a greedy whore, nothing else. She cares about nobody else but the greedy good for nothing executive layer of companies who want to chase cheaper labor at the cost of the company and the quality of it’s products so that they can just collect their bonuses.
Meg Whitman has clearly stated that she wants to eliminate the H1b visa cap and bring in unlimited amounts of cheap labor…SHAME on her! She is not only a disgrace to humanity, she is a disgrace to this country.
October 1, 2010 at 6:46 PM #611764ParticipantMeg Whitman is a greedy whore, nothing else. She cares about nobody else but the greedy good for nothing executive layer of companies who want to chase cheaper labor at the cost of the company and the quality of it’s products so that they can just collect their bonuses.
Meg Whitman has clearly stated that she wants to eliminate the H1b visa cap and bring in unlimited amounts of cheap labor…SHAME on her! She is not only a disgrace to humanity, she is a disgrace to this country.
October 1, 2010 at 6:46 PM #612312ParticipantMeg Whitman is a greedy whore, nothing else. She cares about nobody else but the greedy good for nothing executive layer of companies who want to chase cheaper labor at the cost of the company and the quality of it’s products so that they can just collect their bonuses.
Meg Whitman has clearly stated that she wants to eliminate the H1b visa cap and bring in unlimited amounts of cheap labor…SHAME on her! She is not only a disgrace to humanity, she is a disgrace to this country.
October 1, 2010 at 6:46 PM #612428ParticipantMeg Whitman is a greedy whore, nothing else. She cares about nobody else but the greedy good for nothing executive layer of companies who want to chase cheaper labor at the cost of the company and the quality of it’s products so that they can just collect their bonuses.
Meg Whitman has clearly stated that she wants to eliminate the H1b visa cap and bring in unlimited amounts of cheap labor…SHAME on her! She is not only a disgrace to humanity, she is a disgrace to this country.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.