OT – Whitman Hired Illegal Worker

[SK in CV]

This really should be all but a non-issue. If, in fact, she really verfied legal residency status, beyond what she was told by the employment agency, she went way beyond what most people in California do. People should be much more concerned that her financial plan for the state will balloon the deficit. But that won’t get the air time it should. Gotcha politics. And her opponent doesn’t have to say a word.

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.

[Ricechex]

[quote=UCGal]This claim would have more credibility if *anyone* but Gloria Allred were representing the housekeeper… Seriously – that woman is annoying and a media whore.[/quote]

Oh yes, she is. I went with a girl to LA a few years ago to see if Gloria Allred would take her case. (It was right up her alley). We had an appointment, made by Ms. Allred and the client (who had several phone calls prior to the appointment. We had to wait 3 hours, just sitting in the waiting room until she graced us with her presence and met with the client. I was none too impressed.

[Ricechex]

[quote=UCGal]This claim would have more credibility if *anyone* but Gloria Allred were representing the housekeeper… Seriously – that woman is annoying and a media whore.[/quote]

Oh yes, she is. I went with a girl to LA a few years ago to see if Gloria Allred would take her case. (It was right up her alley). We had an appointment, made by Ms. Allred and the client (who had several phone calls prior to the appointment. We had to wait 3 hours, just sitting in the waiting room until she graced us with her presence and met with the client. I was none too impressed.

[Ricechex]

[quote=UCGal]This claim would have more credibility if *anyone* but Gloria Allred were representing the housekeeper… Seriously – that woman is annoying and a media whore.[/quote]

Oh yes, she is. I went with a girl to LA a few years ago to see if Gloria Allred would take her case. (It was right up her alley). We had an appointment, made by Ms. Allred and the client (who had several phone calls prior to the appointment. We had to wait 3 hours, just sitting in the waiting room until she graced us with her presence and met with the client. I was none too impressed.

[Ricechex]

[quote=UCGal]This claim would have more credibility if *anyone* but Gloria Allred were representing the housekeeper… Seriously – that woman is annoying and a media whore.[/quote]

Oh yes, she is. I went with a girl to LA a few years ago to see if Gloria Allred would take her case. (It was right up her alley). We had an appointment, made by Ms. Allred and the client (who had several phone calls prior to the appointment. We had to wait 3 hours, just sitting in the waiting room until she graced us with her presence and met with the client. I was none too impressed.

[Ricechex]

[quote=UCGal]This claim would have more credibility if *anyone* but Gloria Allred were representing the housekeeper… Seriously – that woman is annoying and a media whore.[/quote]

Oh yes, she is. I went with a girl to LA a few years ago to see if Gloria Allred would take her case. (It was right up her alley). We had an appointment, made by Ms. Allred and the client (who had several phone calls prior to the appointment. We had to wait 3 hours, just sitting in the waiting room until she graced us with her presence and met with the client. I was none too impressed.

[briansd1]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.[/quote]

It is an issue because Whitman made it an issue.

Ms. Whitman has taken a hard line on illegal immigration. The allegations came a day after Ms. Whitman said she didn’t support a path to legalization for the millions of undocumented workers during a debate with Mr. Brown, who supports legalizing the workers.

“We do have to hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers,” Ms. Whitman said at the debate.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Here are facts.

[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

But did Whitman pay the agency or the housekeeper directly?

Did Whitman pay all the payroll taxes? Whitman should make payroll reports and filings available.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.

[/quote]

If Whitman paid the housekeeper directly, hiring through the agency does not absolve Whitman from verifying employment eligibility for her housekeeper.

Is the outsourcing of eligibility verification a good excuse?

Walmart’s janitors were not even its own employees; but Walmart was investigated and fined.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150846,00.html

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?

http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1185221678150.shtm#2

[briansd1]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.[/quote]

It is an issue because Whitman made it an issue.

Ms. Whitman has taken a hard line on illegal immigration. The allegations came a day after Ms. Whitman said she didn’t support a path to legalization for the millions of undocumented workers during a debate with Mr. Brown, who supports legalizing the workers.

“We do have to hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers,” Ms. Whitman said at the debate.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Here are facts.

[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

But did Whitman pay the agency or the housekeeper directly?

Did Whitman pay all the payroll taxes? Whitman should make payroll reports and filings available.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.

[/quote]

If Whitman paid the housekeeper directly, hiring through the agency does not absolve Whitman from verifying employment eligibility for her housekeeper.

Is the outsourcing of eligibility verification a good excuse?

Walmart’s janitors were not even its own employees; but Walmart was investigated and fined.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150846,00.html

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?

http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1185221678150.shtm#2

[briansd1]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.[/quote]

It is an issue because Whitman made it an issue.

Ms. Whitman has taken a hard line on illegal immigration. The allegations came a day after Ms. Whitman said she didn’t support a path to legalization for the millions of undocumented workers during a debate with Mr. Brown, who supports legalizing the workers.

“We do have to hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers,” Ms. Whitman said at the debate.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Here are facts.

[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

But did Whitman pay the agency or the housekeeper directly?

Did Whitman pay all the payroll taxes? Whitman should make payroll reports and filings available.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.

[/quote]

If Whitman paid the housekeeper directly, hiring through the agency does not absolve Whitman from verifying employment eligibility for her housekeeper.

Is the outsourcing of eligibility verification a good excuse?

Walmart’s janitors were not even its own employees; but Walmart was investigated and fined.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150846,00.html

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?

http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1185221678150.shtm#2

[briansd1]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.[/quote]

It is an issue because Whitman made it an issue.

Ms. Whitman has taken a hard line on illegal immigration. The allegations came a day after Ms. Whitman said she didn’t support a path to legalization for the millions of undocumented workers during a debate with Mr. Brown, who supports legalizing the workers.

“We do have to hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers,” Ms. Whitman said at the debate.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Here are facts.

[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

But did Whitman pay the agency or the housekeeper directly?

Did Whitman pay all the payroll taxes? Whitman should make payroll reports and filings available.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.

[/quote]

If Whitman paid the housekeeper directly, hiring through the agency does not absolve Whitman from verifying employment eligibility for her housekeeper.

Is the outsourcing of eligibility verification a good excuse?

Walmart’s janitors were not even its own employees; but Walmart was investigated and fined.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150846,00.html

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?

http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1185221678150.shtm#2

[Author]

Posts