- This topic has 570 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM #18009September 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM #610690
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBrian: Really? Rich has been issuing admonitions left and right (no pun intended) about this sort of nonsense, and you post this?
Although, gee, if Gloria Allred, that pillar of jurisprudence, is represnting her, then Miz Diaz must be on the side of Right, Truth and Justice!
Enough, already.
September 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM #610777Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBrian: Really? Rich has been issuing admonitions left and right (no pun intended) about this sort of nonsense, and you post this?
Although, gee, if Gloria Allred, that pillar of jurisprudence, is represnting her, then Miz Diaz must be on the side of Right, Truth and Justice!
Enough, already.
September 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM #611320Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBrian: Really? Rich has been issuing admonitions left and right (no pun intended) about this sort of nonsense, and you post this?
Although, gee, if Gloria Allred, that pillar of jurisprudence, is represnting her, then Miz Diaz must be on the side of Right, Truth and Justice!
Enough, already.
September 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM #611431Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBrian: Really? Rich has been issuing admonitions left and right (no pun intended) about this sort of nonsense, and you post this?
Although, gee, if Gloria Allred, that pillar of jurisprudence, is represnting her, then Miz Diaz must be on the side of Right, Truth and Justice!
Enough, already.
September 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM #611745Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantBrian: Really? Rich has been issuing admonitions left and right (no pun intended) about this sort of nonsense, and you post this?
Although, gee, if Gloria Allred, that pillar of jurisprudence, is represnting her, then Miz Diaz must be on the side of Right, Truth and Justice!
Enough, already.
September 29, 2010 at 4:09 PM #610710enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantHere are facts.
[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.
September 29, 2010 at 4:09 PM #610797enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantHere are facts.
[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.
September 29, 2010 at 4:09 PM #611339enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantHere are facts.
[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.
September 29, 2010 at 4:09 PM #611451enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantHere are facts.
[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.
September 29, 2010 at 4:09 PM #611765enron_by_the_sea
ParticipantHere are facts.
[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.
September 29, 2010 at 4:49 PM #610720briansd1
GuestAllan, this a post about immigration.
Like this tread here:
http://piggington.com/ot_illegal039s_arizona_and_obamaSeptember 29, 2010 at 4:49 PM #610807briansd1
GuestAllan, this a post about immigration.
Like this tread here:
http://piggington.com/ot_illegal039s_arizona_and_obamaSeptember 29, 2010 at 4:49 PM #611349briansd1
GuestAllan, this a post about immigration.
Like this tread here:
http://piggington.com/ot_illegal039s_arizona_and_obamaSeptember 29, 2010 at 4:49 PM #611461briansd1
GuestAllan, this a post about immigration.
Like this tread here:
http://piggington.com/ot_illegal039s_arizona_and_obama -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.