OT – Whitman Hired Illegal Worker

[AK]

I am not a Whitman supporter BUT …

The letter sent to Whitman by the SSA regarding the maid’s SSN specifically states: “This letter … is not a basis, in and of itself, for you to take any adverse actions against the employee … Any employer that uses the information in this letter to justify taking adverse action against an employee may violate state or federal law and be subject to legal consequences.”

AND … While employers are required to complete a Form I-9 attesting that the employee provided “facially valid” proof of identity and eligibility to work, It is ILLEGAL to arbitrarily reject valid or valid-looking documents, or to demand more proof than the law requires. That constitutes discrimination based on immigration status, national origin, etc.

3. The government makes mistakes too. I’d hate to be summarily dismissed because some agency sent my employer a nastygram by mistake. Worse than the time my high school report card got screwed up.

[enron_by_the_sea]

So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?

[enron_by_the_sea]

So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?

[enron_by_the_sea]

So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?

[enron_by_the_sea]

So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?

[enron_by_the_sea]

So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]

Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.

This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]

Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.

This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]

Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.

This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]

Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.

This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]

Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.

This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.

[carlsbadworker]

Finally a relevant post. You’re right on.

Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.

All other things are just noises, ignore them.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]

[carlsbadworker]

Finally a relevant post. You’re right on.

Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.

All other things are just noises, ignore them.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]

[carlsbadworker]

Finally a relevant post. You’re right on.

Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.

All other things are just noises, ignore them.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]

[carlsbadworker]

Finally a relevant post. You’re right on.

Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.

All other things are just noises, ignore them.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.

Imagine this scenario in November 2010

[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.

and/or

[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.

[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]

Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]

[Author]

Posts