OT – Illegal’s, Arizona, and Obama…

[LuckyInOC]

Well, I did a little more research…

#1 Minimum Wage
– failure to pay minimum wage
– Penalty: $100 to each employee first violation
$250 to each employee each payperiod

#2 Pay Stub Rules
– Inclusive dates of pay period
– Name of employee and SSI number (last four digits)
– Name and address of employer
– hourly rates and hours worked by employee
– Penalty: $100 per employee, per violation – $4000 max

#3 Report New Employees
– Employee’s full name, SSI number, address, and start-of-work date
– Employer’s name, address, California employer account number, and FEIN.
– Within 20 days of hiring
– Penalty: $24 per employee

The penalties just on these items for 1 employee for 1 year:
#1 = $100 + ($250 x 25 wks) = $6,350
#2 = $100 + ($100 x 25wks) = $2,600
#3 = $24

Therefore, I can calcualate at least $8,974 in penalties per employee for employers who hire workers off the books – legal or illegal for one
year.

This would not be subject to discrimination charges by the Federal Courts because it would be applied to equally to citizens, non-citizens, authorized immigrants, or unauthorized immigrants under current laws that have been in place for many years. The violations are against the employers, not employees – unauthorized immigrants.

Did you know that of 389 inspections only 4,092 unreported employees were found at a citation amount of $4,106,894 or a $1000 per person.
http://www.edd.ca.gov/Payroll_Taxes/Underground_Economy_Operations.htm

That is only 1 inspection per day. The estimated number of illegal immigrants in California is 3 million. If I assume that 1/3 are employed, it will take the state of California (EDD) 244 years to find them all.

I know I could do better myself. I wonder if the state would contract that out to me. It is quite obvious our California and Federal politicians do not want to address the underground economy due to the immigration issue. I think I could get elected to Governor on just this platform.

Lucky In OC for Governor in 2014…

[briansd1]

Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.

[briansd1]

Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.

[briansd1]

Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.

[briansd1]

Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.

[briansd1]

Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.

[LuckyInOC]

[quote=briansd1]Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.[/quote]

Brian,

You are talking to the wrong person about ‘most vulnerable’ immigrants. My wife and her family had to leave Iraq during the 1st Gulf War and flee to Italy. They had to stay there for 5 years before immigrating to the US under special circumstances where her two brothers were US citizens. After three years in the US, they saved enough to purchased a home in No. OC.

Her uncle and his family stayed behind in Iraq until the 2nd Gulf War. He had to flee Iraq to Turkey to protect his family from being killed by the mujahideen. I have copies of the original and officially transcribed death threats in my posession. He and his family were required to stay in Turkey as refugees. Although they wanted, they could not work or go to school in Turkey as classified refugees. They were forced to remain in Turkey for 5 years. They finally were able to immigrate to the US 2 years ago. Once the immigrated US, their family and Chaldean community in La Mesa helped them find housing and legal jobs without government support.

One of his sons and family stayed behind and was killed in his kitchen in front of his wife and kids by the mujahideen when coming home from work.

The Chaldeans are a very self-sufficient people and full of ethnic pride. Everyone I know immigrated here legally and waited their time, sometimes in refugee camps. They try support their own people without government handouts. When they were in Iraq, these people help feed and support our troops. I am sure there are many nations in the world that have similar stories. So, why should immigrants from the south have more right to immigrate than any other country. That does not seem fair. Actually, it sounds quite prejudicious. You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.

[LuckyInOC]

[quote=briansd1]Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.[/quote]

Brian,

You are talking to the wrong person about ‘most vulnerable’ immigrants. My wife and her family had to leave Iraq during the 1st Gulf War and flee to Italy. They had to stay there for 5 years before immigrating to the US under special circumstances where her two brothers were US citizens. After three years in the US, they saved enough to purchased a home in No. OC.

Her uncle and his family stayed behind in Iraq until the 2nd Gulf War. He had to flee Iraq to Turkey to protect his family from being killed by the mujahideen. I have copies of the original and officially transcribed death threats in my posession. He and his family were required to stay in Turkey as refugees. Although they wanted, they could not work or go to school in Turkey as classified refugees. They were forced to remain in Turkey for 5 years. They finally were able to immigrate to the US 2 years ago. Once the immigrated US, their family and Chaldean community in La Mesa helped them find housing and legal jobs without government support.

One of his sons and family stayed behind and was killed in his kitchen in front of his wife and kids by the mujahideen when coming home from work.

The Chaldeans are a very self-sufficient people and full of ethnic pride. Everyone I know immigrated here legally and waited their time, sometimes in refugee camps. They try support their own people without government handouts. When they were in Iraq, these people help feed and support our troops. I am sure there are many nations in the world that have similar stories. So, why should immigrants from the south have more right to immigrate than any other country. That does not seem fair. Actually, it sounds quite prejudicious. You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.

[LuckyInOC]

[quote=briansd1]Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.[/quote]

Brian,

You are talking to the wrong person about ‘most vulnerable’ immigrants. My wife and her family had to leave Iraq during the 1st Gulf War and flee to Italy. They had to stay there for 5 years before immigrating to the US under special circumstances where her two brothers were US citizens. After three years in the US, they saved enough to purchased a home in No. OC.

Her uncle and his family stayed behind in Iraq until the 2nd Gulf War. He had to flee Iraq to Turkey to protect his family from being killed by the mujahideen. I have copies of the original and officially transcribed death threats in my posession. He and his family were required to stay in Turkey as refugees. Although they wanted, they could not work or go to school in Turkey as classified refugees. They were forced to remain in Turkey for 5 years. They finally were able to immigrate to the US 2 years ago. Once the immigrated US, their family and Chaldean community in La Mesa helped them find housing and legal jobs without government support.

One of his sons and family stayed behind and was killed in his kitchen in front of his wife and kids by the mujahideen when coming home from work.

The Chaldeans are a very self-sufficient people and full of ethnic pride. Everyone I know immigrated here legally and waited their time, sometimes in refugee camps. They try support their own people without government handouts. When they were in Iraq, these people help feed and support our troops. I am sure there are many nations in the world that have similar stories. So, why should immigrants from the south have more right to immigrate than any other country. That does not seem fair. Actually, it sounds quite prejudicious. You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.

[LuckyInOC]

[quote=briansd1]Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.[/quote]

Brian,

You are talking to the wrong person about ‘most vulnerable’ immigrants. My wife and her family had to leave Iraq during the 1st Gulf War and flee to Italy. They had to stay there for 5 years before immigrating to the US under special circumstances where her two brothers were US citizens. After three years in the US, they saved enough to purchased a home in No. OC.

Her uncle and his family stayed behind in Iraq until the 2nd Gulf War. He had to flee Iraq to Turkey to protect his family from being killed by the mujahideen. I have copies of the original and officially transcribed death threats in my posession. He and his family were required to stay in Turkey as refugees. Although they wanted, they could not work or go to school in Turkey as classified refugees. They were forced to remain in Turkey for 5 years. They finally were able to immigrate to the US 2 years ago. Once the immigrated US, their family and Chaldean community in La Mesa helped them find housing and legal jobs without government support.

One of his sons and family stayed behind and was killed in his kitchen in front of his wife and kids by the mujahideen when coming home from work.

The Chaldeans are a very self-sufficient people and full of ethnic pride. Everyone I know immigrated here legally and waited their time, sometimes in refugee camps. They try support their own people without government handouts. When they were in Iraq, these people help feed and support our troops. I am sure there are many nations in the world that have similar stories. So, why should immigrants from the south have more right to immigrate than any other country. That does not seem fair. Actually, it sounds quite prejudicious. You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.

[LuckyInOC]

[quote=briansd1]Lucky in OC. Enforcement of existing labor laws is not mutually exclusive from providing a path to legalization to the most vulnerable, but otherwise law-abiding and hardworking, immigrants already here.

That’s why comprehensive immigration reform is important.[/quote]

Brian,

You are talking to the wrong person about ‘most vulnerable’ immigrants. My wife and her family had to leave Iraq during the 1st Gulf War and flee to Italy. They had to stay there for 5 years before immigrating to the US under special circumstances where her two brothers were US citizens. After three years in the US, they saved enough to purchased a home in No. OC.

Her uncle and his family stayed behind in Iraq until the 2nd Gulf War. He had to flee Iraq to Turkey to protect his family from being killed by the mujahideen. I have copies of the original and officially transcribed death threats in my posession. He and his family were required to stay in Turkey as refugees. Although they wanted, they could not work or go to school in Turkey as classified refugees. They were forced to remain in Turkey for 5 years. They finally were able to immigrate to the US 2 years ago. Once the immigrated US, their family and Chaldean community in La Mesa helped them find housing and legal jobs without government support.

One of his sons and family stayed behind and was killed in his kitchen in front of his wife and kids by the mujahideen when coming home from work.

The Chaldeans are a very self-sufficient people and full of ethnic pride. Everyone I know immigrated here legally and waited their time, sometimes in refugee camps. They try support their own people without government handouts. When they were in Iraq, these people help feed and support our troops. I am sure there are many nations in the world that have similar stories. So, why should immigrants from the south have more right to immigrate than any other country. That does not seem fair. Actually, it sounds quite prejudicious. You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.

[briansd1]

[quote=LuckyInOC]You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.[/quote]

Not all all.

I’m actually in favor of allowing many more Iraqi refugees to resettle in America. It’s our responsibility since we created such a mess in Iraq.

I believe that the difference between Iraqi refugees and unauthorized Hispanic immigrants is that the refugees are legal residents with a clear path to citizenship.

Legal immigrants are integrated into the official economy. They can drive cars, work, and save money to buy houses.

Unauthorized immigrants are “on the run”. They are afraid at every turn so they just get by. They pay high fees and surcharges for everything so they can’t save money.

I believe that our economy would be stronger if we legalized the unauthorized immigrants already in the country.

[briansd1]

[quote=LuckyInOC]You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.[/quote]

Not all all.

I’m actually in favor of allowing many more Iraqi refugees to resettle in America. It’s our responsibility since we created such a mess in Iraq.

I believe that the difference between Iraqi refugees and unauthorized Hispanic immigrants is that the refugees are legal residents with a clear path to citizenship.

Legal immigrants are integrated into the official economy. They can drive cars, work, and save money to buy houses.

Unauthorized immigrants are “on the run”. They are afraid at every turn so they just get by. They pay high fees and surcharges for everything so they can’t save money.

I believe that our economy would be stronger if we legalized the unauthorized immigrants already in the country.

[briansd1]

[quote=LuckyInOC]You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.[/quote]

Not all all.

I’m actually in favor of allowing many more Iraqi refugees to resettle in America. It’s our responsibility since we created such a mess in Iraq.

I believe that the difference between Iraqi refugees and unauthorized Hispanic immigrants is that the refugees are legal residents with a clear path to citizenship.

Legal immigrants are integrated into the official economy. They can drive cars, work, and save money to buy houses.

Unauthorized immigrants are “on the run”. They are afraid at every turn so they just get by. They pay high fees and surcharges for everything so they can’t save money.

I believe that our economy would be stronger if we legalized the unauthorized immigrants already in the country.

[briansd1]

[quote=LuckyInOC]You are favoring hispanics over the rights of other ethic groups in the world.[/quote]

Not all all.

I’m actually in favor of allowing many more Iraqi refugees to resettle in America. It’s our responsibility since we created such a mess in Iraq.

I believe that the difference between Iraqi refugees and unauthorized Hispanic immigrants is that the refugees are legal residents with a clear path to citizenship.

Legal immigrants are integrated into the official economy. They can drive cars, work, and save money to buy houses.

Unauthorized immigrants are “on the run”. They are afraid at every turn so they just get by. They pay high fees and surcharges for everything so they can’t save money.

I believe that our economy would be stronger if we legalized the unauthorized immigrants already in the country.

[Author]

Posts