OT: Cap and Tax. Maybe One of the Largest Tax Increases in a Long While?

[Zeitgeist]

As usual Arraya brings facts to the discussion. Not only is it a job killer, crap and tax is a progressive tax on the poor. If this is just about money, make it a flat tax and spare me the BS about saving the planet. One big war, one big volcano, etc. and it’s all over except the crying. Check out the fossil records to see the impact of a nuclear winter on a very successful species. Maybe it is our destiny to kill humans off for the good of the planet. It might make room for a superior replacement. Give me a break air (_ogi). Is that a pun?

[luchabee]

[quote=air_ogi]He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[/quote]

You probably didn’t read the bottom of this message concerning the co-author of this report, who is an environmental scientists with a doctorate in Physics.

Besides, both authors until now were deemed qualified by the EPA’s National Center for Environmental Economics.

Carlin is a senior operations research analyst who has worked in EPA’s economics office since 1983. He has a doctorate in economics and a bachelor’s degree in physics. He specializes in cost-benefit analysis and the economics of global climate change control, EPA said. The co-author of the report, John Davidson, is an environmental scientist in the economics office who holds a doctorate in physics. Davidson also joined the program in 1983.

[luchabee]

[quote=air_ogi]He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[/quote]

You probably didn’t read the bottom of this message concerning the co-author of this report, who is an environmental scientists with a doctorate in Physics.

Besides, both authors until now were deemed qualified by the EPA’s National Center for Environmental Economics.

Carlin is a senior operations research analyst who has worked in EPA’s economics office since 1983. He has a doctorate in economics and a bachelor’s degree in physics. He specializes in cost-benefit analysis and the economics of global climate change control, EPA said. The co-author of the report, John Davidson, is an environmental scientist in the economics office who holds a doctorate in physics. Davidson also joined the program in 1983.

[luchabee]

[quote=air_ogi]He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[/quote]

You probably didn’t read the bottom of this message concerning the co-author of this report, who is an environmental scientists with a doctorate in Physics.

Besides, both authors until now were deemed qualified by the EPA’s National Center for Environmental Economics.

Carlin is a senior operations research analyst who has worked in EPA’s economics office since 1983. He has a doctorate in economics and a bachelor’s degree in physics. He specializes in cost-benefit analysis and the economics of global climate change control, EPA said. The co-author of the report, John Davidson, is an environmental scientist in the economics office who holds a doctorate in physics. Davidson also joined the program in 1983.

[luchabee]

[quote=air_ogi]He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[/quote]

You probably didn’t read the bottom of this message concerning the co-author of this report, who is an environmental scientists with a doctorate in Physics.

Besides, both authors until now were deemed qualified by the EPA’s National Center for Environmental Economics.

Carlin is a senior operations research analyst who has worked in EPA’s economics office since 1983. He has a doctorate in economics and a bachelor’s degree in physics. He specializes in cost-benefit analysis and the economics of global climate change control, EPA said. The co-author of the report, John Davidson, is an environmental scientist in the economics office who holds a doctorate in physics. Davidson also joined the program in 1983.

[luchabee]

[quote=air_ogi]He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[/quote]

You probably didn’t read the bottom of this message concerning the co-author of this report, who is an environmental scientists with a doctorate in Physics.

Besides, both authors until now were deemed qualified by the EPA’s National Center for Environmental Economics.

Carlin is a senior operations research analyst who has worked in EPA’s economics office since 1983. He has a doctorate in economics and a bachelor’s degree in physics. He specializes in cost-benefit analysis and the economics of global climate change control, EPA said. The co-author of the report, John Davidson, is an environmental scientist in the economics office who holds a doctorate in physics. Davidson also joined the program in 1983.

[luchabee]

Here is the actual link to the report:

http://www.eenews.net/public/25/11519/features/documents/2009/06/26/document_gw_01.pdf

[luchabee]

Here is the actual link to the report:

http://www.eenews.net/public/25/11519/features/documents/2009/06/26/document_gw_01.pdf

[luchabee]

Here is the actual link to the report:

http://www.eenews.net/public/25/11519/features/documents/2009/06/26/document_gw_01.pdf

[luchabee]

Here is the actual link to the report:

http://www.eenews.net/public/25/11519/features/documents/2009/06/26/document_gw_01.pdf

[luchabee]

Here is the actual link to the report:

http://www.eenews.net/public/25/11519/features/documents/2009/06/26/document_gw_01.pdf

[Zeitgeist]

The only explanation for blatantly ignoring the decrease in GW discussed on page 89 is because it is not about GW, it is about more government control and more taxation. This is getting crazy.

[Zeitgeist]

The only explanation for blatantly ignoring the decrease in GW discussed on page 89 is because it is not about GW, it is about more government control and more taxation. This is getting crazy.

[Zeitgeist]

The only explanation for blatantly ignoring the decrease in GW discussed on page 89 is because it is not about GW, it is about more government control and more taxation. This is getting crazy.

[Zeitgeist]

The only explanation for blatantly ignoring the decrease in GW discussed on page 89 is because it is not about GW, it is about more government control and more taxation. This is getting crazy.

[Author]

Posts