OT: Cap and Tax. Maybe One of the Largest Tax Increases in a Long While?

[Coronita]

Well looks like Ford, GM, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda Nissan all are killing diesel efforts for passenger cars. (*dumbasses*)

Looks like if you want to with diesel, it will be a german car for a long long time….

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/01/dead-diesels-six-automakers-kill-plans-for-oil-burners/

Diesel’s near-term prospects in America took a huge hit with the revelation that nine diesel-powered 2010 models are on hold. Ford, General Motors, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan have put the kibosh on rolling out more oil burners due to cost and perception issues.

[Zeitgeist]

U.S. Senate Report Debunks Polar Bear Extinction Fears:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Facts&ContentRecord_id=cb2faa9c-802a-23ad-4bcc-29bb94ceb993&IsPrint=true

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is considering listing the polar bear a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. This report details the scientists debunking polar bear endangerment fears and features a sampling of the latest peer-reviewed science detailing the natural causes of recent Arctic ice changes.

[Zeitgeist]

U.S. Senate Report Debunks Polar Bear Extinction Fears:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Facts&ContentRecord_id=cb2faa9c-802a-23ad-4bcc-29bb94ceb993&IsPrint=true

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is considering listing the polar bear a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. This report details the scientists debunking polar bear endangerment fears and features a sampling of the latest peer-reviewed science detailing the natural causes of recent Arctic ice changes.

[Zeitgeist]

U.S. Senate Report Debunks Polar Bear Extinction Fears:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Facts&ContentRecord_id=cb2faa9c-802a-23ad-4bcc-29bb94ceb993&IsPrint=true

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is considering listing the polar bear a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. This report details the scientists debunking polar bear endangerment fears and features a sampling of the latest peer-reviewed science detailing the natural causes of recent Arctic ice changes.

[Zeitgeist]

U.S. Senate Report Debunks Polar Bear Extinction Fears:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Facts&ContentRecord_id=cb2faa9c-802a-23ad-4bcc-29bb94ceb993&IsPrint=true

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is considering listing the polar bear a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. This report details the scientists debunking polar bear endangerment fears and features a sampling of the latest peer-reviewed science detailing the natural causes of recent Arctic ice changes.

[Zeitgeist]

U.S. Senate Report Debunks Polar Bear Extinction Fears:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Facts&ContentRecord_id=cb2faa9c-802a-23ad-4bcc-29bb94ceb993&IsPrint=true

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is considering listing the polar bear a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. This report details the scientists debunking polar bear endangerment fears and features a sampling of the latest peer-reviewed science detailing the natural causes of recent Arctic ice changes.

[air_ogi]

He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[air_ogi]

He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[air_ogi]

He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[air_ogi]

He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[air_ogi]

He is an economist. Neither his Ph.D in economics nor his BS in physics have anything to do with climate change.

If his paper was about how cap and trade will destroy the US economy, fine. But it is not.
Exxon sponsored groups can call him the the expert on climate change, but he is not.

Here is the latest data about how Greenland ice is doing great. From actual scientists.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090612092741.htm

[Zeitgeist]

You are as believable to me as Joseph Goebbels. You conveniently pick and choose which scientist to pimp and which to debunk. In the 70’s the media was wringing their hands about global cooling. What gives? How will cap and trade solve anything when some of the biggest polluters, China and India refuse to go along with it? They want to grow their economy, not crash it. You libs are priceless. Keep clinging to your crazy ideas and see if they get your party elected during the next election cycle. Do the green jobs created even begin to replace all the jobs that we are losing? Hope and change, not.

[Zeitgeist]

You are as believable to me as Joseph Goebbels. You conveniently pick and choose which scientist to pimp and which to debunk. In the 70’s the media was wringing their hands about global cooling. What gives? How will cap and trade solve anything when some of the biggest polluters, China and India refuse to go along with it? They want to grow their economy, not crash it. You libs are priceless. Keep clinging to your crazy ideas and see if they get your party elected during the next election cycle. Do the green jobs created even begin to replace all the jobs that we are losing? Hope and change, not.

[Zeitgeist]

You are as believable to me as Joseph Goebbels. You conveniently pick and choose which scientist to pimp and which to debunk. In the 70’s the media was wringing their hands about global cooling. What gives? How will cap and trade solve anything when some of the biggest polluters, China and India refuse to go along with it? They want to grow their economy, not crash it. You libs are priceless. Keep clinging to your crazy ideas and see if they get your party elected during the next election cycle. Do the green jobs created even begin to replace all the jobs that we are losing? Hope and change, not.

[Zeitgeist]

You are as believable to me as Joseph Goebbels. You conveniently pick and choose which scientist to pimp and which to debunk. In the 70’s the media was wringing their hands about global cooling. What gives? How will cap and trade solve anything when some of the biggest polluters, China and India refuse to go along with it? They want to grow their economy, not crash it. You libs are priceless. Keep clinging to your crazy ideas and see if they get your party elected during the next election cycle. Do the green jobs created even begin to replace all the jobs that we are losing? Hope and change, not.

[Author]

Posts