- This topic has 381 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 15, 2008 at 9:49 AM #257552August 15, 2008 at 9:49 AM #257601Allan from FallbrookParticipant
afx: I’m willing to bet that both sides share culpability. Undoubtedly the Georgians, bolstered by their relationship with the US, tweaked Putin’s nose and the Russians wasted no time in seizing the opportunity to respond.
Putin’s annoyance with Georgia is well known, as are his ambitions to restore Russia’s fading glory and pre-empt NATO’s moves further east.
However, the idea that arraya expounds, namely that the West and NATO are “aggressors” is arrant nonsense. Russia has become extremely bellicose as of late, largely fueled by her newfound energy wealth and resulting influence in Europe. Russia has always had designs on this part of the world, and Putin took a calculated gamble.
Wolverines!
August 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM #257319paranoidParticipantWho started this conflict? Geogia.
Geogia believed that it is backed by the USA and the NATO,and kept challenging Russia including killing people in its 2 break-away regions. Geogia only too late discovered that USA and the NATO’s backing is only in words, not in real deeds.
Russian behaviors are starting to resemble more and more to the US’ when it comes to its national interests.
August 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM #257502paranoidParticipantWho started this conflict? Geogia.
Geogia believed that it is backed by the USA and the NATO,and kept challenging Russia including killing people in its 2 break-away regions. Geogia only too late discovered that USA and the NATO’s backing is only in words, not in real deeds.
Russian behaviors are starting to resemble more and more to the US’ when it comes to its national interests.
August 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM #257518paranoidParticipantWho started this conflict? Geogia.
Geogia believed that it is backed by the USA and the NATO,and kept challenging Russia including killing people in its 2 break-away regions. Geogia only too late discovered that USA and the NATO’s backing is only in words, not in real deeds.
Russian behaviors are starting to resemble more and more to the US’ when it comes to its national interests.
August 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM #257562paranoidParticipantWho started this conflict? Geogia.
Geogia believed that it is backed by the USA and the NATO,and kept challenging Russia including killing people in its 2 break-away regions. Geogia only too late discovered that USA and the NATO’s backing is only in words, not in real deeds.
Russian behaviors are starting to resemble more and more to the US’ when it comes to its national interests.
August 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM #257611paranoidParticipantWho started this conflict? Geogia.
Geogia believed that it is backed by the USA and the NATO,and kept challenging Russia including killing people in its 2 break-away regions. Geogia only too late discovered that USA and the NATO’s backing is only in words, not in real deeds.
Russian behaviors are starting to resemble more and more to the US’ when it comes to its national interests.
August 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM #257334afx114ParticipantAlso there was news yesterday that the US agreed with Poland to house a missile defense. Could that have been announced at a worse time? Russia must be pissed. I’m sure we’ll see Russian missiles in Cuba next, and could you blame them? Deja-vu all over again.
I believe it was Russia’s UN guy who said that “invading sovereign countries is an American trait.” And he’s right. The US has absolutely no moral authority in the matter.
August 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM #257517afx114ParticipantAlso there was news yesterday that the US agreed with Poland to house a missile defense. Could that have been announced at a worse time? Russia must be pissed. I’m sure we’ll see Russian missiles in Cuba next, and could you blame them? Deja-vu all over again.
I believe it was Russia’s UN guy who said that “invading sovereign countries is an American trait.” And he’s right. The US has absolutely no moral authority in the matter.
August 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM #257532afx114ParticipantAlso there was news yesterday that the US agreed with Poland to house a missile defense. Could that have been announced at a worse time? Russia must be pissed. I’m sure we’ll see Russian missiles in Cuba next, and could you blame them? Deja-vu all over again.
I believe it was Russia’s UN guy who said that “invading sovereign countries is an American trait.” And he’s right. The US has absolutely no moral authority in the matter.
August 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM #257577afx114ParticipantAlso there was news yesterday that the US agreed with Poland to house a missile defense. Could that have been announced at a worse time? Russia must be pissed. I’m sure we’ll see Russian missiles in Cuba next, and could you blame them? Deja-vu all over again.
I believe it was Russia’s UN guy who said that “invading sovereign countries is an American trait.” And he’s right. The US has absolutely no moral authority in the matter.
August 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM #257625afx114ParticipantAlso there was news yesterday that the US agreed with Poland to house a missile defense. Could that have been announced at a worse time? Russia must be pissed. I’m sure we’ll see Russian missiles in Cuba next, and could you blame them? Deja-vu all over again.
I believe it was Russia’s UN guy who said that “invading sovereign countries is an American trait.” And he’s right. The US has absolutely no moral authority in the matter.
August 15, 2008 at 10:45 AM #257376Allan from FallbrookParticipantafx: That’s frickin’ hilarious, coming from the Russians. You look at the Soviets, especially starting with the 1956 invasion of Hungary and culminating with Afghanistan 1979, and their proxy support of all those “Wars of National Liberation”, and they are passing judgment on us? Uh, yeah, okay.
And don’t have any illusions about the “new” Russia. It’s the “old” Russia all over again.
Putin will use whatever pretext is necessary to re-establish Russian dominance in the region, and the US and NATO are nothing other than convenient foils for his ambitions. Russia is using a combination of soft power (through controlling energy resources and transmission of same to Europe) and hard power (in the form of power projection) to bring greater glory to Mother Russia.
Putin is former KGB, and a member of Pamyat, an ultranationalist movement solely dedicated to “Russian national revival”. If any of this rings any bells regarding another ultranationalist bent on regional domination in Europe, it should.
August 15, 2008 at 10:45 AM #257558Allan from FallbrookParticipantafx: That’s frickin’ hilarious, coming from the Russians. You look at the Soviets, especially starting with the 1956 invasion of Hungary and culminating with Afghanistan 1979, and their proxy support of all those “Wars of National Liberation”, and they are passing judgment on us? Uh, yeah, okay.
And don’t have any illusions about the “new” Russia. It’s the “old” Russia all over again.
Putin will use whatever pretext is necessary to re-establish Russian dominance in the region, and the US and NATO are nothing other than convenient foils for his ambitions. Russia is using a combination of soft power (through controlling energy resources and transmission of same to Europe) and hard power (in the form of power projection) to bring greater glory to Mother Russia.
Putin is former KGB, and a member of Pamyat, an ultranationalist movement solely dedicated to “Russian national revival”. If any of this rings any bells regarding another ultranationalist bent on regional domination in Europe, it should.
August 15, 2008 at 10:45 AM #257574Allan from FallbrookParticipantafx: That’s frickin’ hilarious, coming from the Russians. You look at the Soviets, especially starting with the 1956 invasion of Hungary and culminating with Afghanistan 1979, and their proxy support of all those “Wars of National Liberation”, and they are passing judgment on us? Uh, yeah, okay.
And don’t have any illusions about the “new” Russia. It’s the “old” Russia all over again.
Putin will use whatever pretext is necessary to re-establish Russian dominance in the region, and the US and NATO are nothing other than convenient foils for his ambitions. Russia is using a combination of soft power (through controlling energy resources and transmission of same to Europe) and hard power (in the form of power projection) to bring greater glory to Mother Russia.
Putin is former KGB, and a member of Pamyat, an ultranationalist movement solely dedicated to “Russian national revival”. If any of this rings any bells regarding another ultranationalist bent on regional domination in Europe, it should.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.