Menu

Home › Forums › Other › Ignore Ron Paul are the new marching orders?

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,077 total)
1 2 3 … 7 8 9 … 70 71 72
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 16, 2011 at 7:41 PM #721390
    Arraya
    Participant

    So your thesis for the constant coordinated ignoring, of a well polled popularity, is due to a high school like immaturity, rather than people of power conspiring due some of his potentially world changing views – yes removing the military from around the world is big business – surely it has nothing to do with that.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:04 PM #720183
    SK in CV
    Participant

    [quote=Arraya]So your thesis for the constant coordinated ignoring, of a well polled popularity, is due to a high school like immaturity, rather than people of power conspiring due some of his potentially world changing views – yes removing the military from around the world is big business – surely it has nothing to do with that.[/quote]

    There might be some back room discussions about dismissing Paul as a serious candidate. I couldn’t say for sure. But the fact is, Paul is not a popular candidate nationwide, and never will be. I can find one major nationwide poll that puts him higher than 4th. Which is pretty much where he’s remained for the last 9 months. I kind of wish he had more support. He’s a lot more interesting than some of the other candidates.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:04 PM #720275
    SK in CV
    Participant

    [quote=Arraya]So your thesis for the constant coordinated ignoring, of a well polled popularity, is due to a high school like immaturity, rather than people of power conspiring due some of his potentially world changing views – yes removing the military from around the world is big business – surely it has nothing to do with that.[/quote]

    There might be some back room discussions about dismissing Paul as a serious candidate. I couldn’t say for sure. But the fact is, Paul is not a popular candidate nationwide, and never will be. I can find one major nationwide poll that puts him higher than 4th. Which is pretty much where he’s remained for the last 9 months. I kind of wish he had more support. He’s a lot more interesting than some of the other candidates.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:04 PM #720875
    SK in CV
    Participant

    [quote=Arraya]So your thesis for the constant coordinated ignoring, of a well polled popularity, is due to a high school like immaturity, rather than people of power conspiring due some of his potentially world changing views – yes removing the military from around the world is big business – surely it has nothing to do with that.[/quote]

    There might be some back room discussions about dismissing Paul as a serious candidate. I couldn’t say for sure. But the fact is, Paul is not a popular candidate nationwide, and never will be. I can find one major nationwide poll that puts him higher than 4th. Which is pretty much where he’s remained for the last 9 months. I kind of wish he had more support. He’s a lot more interesting than some of the other candidates.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:04 PM #721032
    SK in CV
    Participant

    [quote=Arraya]So your thesis for the constant coordinated ignoring, of a well polled popularity, is due to a high school like immaturity, rather than people of power conspiring due some of his potentially world changing views – yes removing the military from around the world is big business – surely it has nothing to do with that.[/quote]

    There might be some back room discussions about dismissing Paul as a serious candidate. I couldn’t say for sure. But the fact is, Paul is not a popular candidate nationwide, and never will be. I can find one major nationwide poll that puts him higher than 4th. Which is pretty much where he’s remained for the last 9 months. I kind of wish he had more support. He’s a lot more interesting than some of the other candidates.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:04 PM #721395
    SK in CV
    Participant

    [quote=Arraya]So your thesis for the constant coordinated ignoring, of a well polled popularity, is due to a high school like immaturity, rather than people of power conspiring due some of his potentially world changing views – yes removing the military from around the world is big business – surely it has nothing to do with that.[/quote]

    There might be some back room discussions about dismissing Paul as a serious candidate. I couldn’t say for sure. But the fact is, Paul is not a popular candidate nationwide, and never will be. I can find one major nationwide poll that puts him higher than 4th. Which is pretty much where he’s remained for the last 9 months. I kind of wish he had more support. He’s a lot more interesting than some of the other candidates.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM #720188
    GH
    Participant

    Ron Paul was the guy we needed 25 years ago to PREVENT the catastrophe we now face. His be fiscally responsible sales pitch is nice in hindsight, but under the circumstances most know even if only in their hearts that we cannot repay but a small percentage of our debts.

    The fact is that even in bankruptcy, there are worse and even worse outcomes. We need to start looking at mitigating damage, not spouting about how we should not print more money etc…

    I have always liked Ron Paul, but his close the barn doors approach is not going to work and he is not the right man for the job.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM #720280
    GH
    Participant

    Ron Paul was the guy we needed 25 years ago to PREVENT the catastrophe we now face. His be fiscally responsible sales pitch is nice in hindsight, but under the circumstances most know even if only in their hearts that we cannot repay but a small percentage of our debts.

    The fact is that even in bankruptcy, there are worse and even worse outcomes. We need to start looking at mitigating damage, not spouting about how we should not print more money etc…

    I have always liked Ron Paul, but his close the barn doors approach is not going to work and he is not the right man for the job.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM #720880
    GH
    Participant

    Ron Paul was the guy we needed 25 years ago to PREVENT the catastrophe we now face. His be fiscally responsible sales pitch is nice in hindsight, but under the circumstances most know even if only in their hearts that we cannot repay but a small percentage of our debts.

    The fact is that even in bankruptcy, there are worse and even worse outcomes. We need to start looking at mitigating damage, not spouting about how we should not print more money etc…

    I have always liked Ron Paul, but his close the barn doors approach is not going to work and he is not the right man for the job.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM #721037
    GH
    Participant

    Ron Paul was the guy we needed 25 years ago to PREVENT the catastrophe we now face. His be fiscally responsible sales pitch is nice in hindsight, but under the circumstances most know even if only in their hearts that we cannot repay but a small percentage of our debts.

    The fact is that even in bankruptcy, there are worse and even worse outcomes. We need to start looking at mitigating damage, not spouting about how we should not print more money etc…

    I have always liked Ron Paul, but his close the barn doors approach is not going to work and he is not the right man for the job.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM #721400
    GH
    Participant

    Ron Paul was the guy we needed 25 years ago to PREVENT the catastrophe we now face. His be fiscally responsible sales pitch is nice in hindsight, but under the circumstances most know even if only in their hearts that we cannot repay but a small percentage of our debts.

    The fact is that even in bankruptcy, there are worse and even worse outcomes. We need to start looking at mitigating damage, not spouting about how we should not print more money etc…

    I have always liked Ron Paul, but his close the barn doors approach is not going to work and he is not the right man for the job.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:59 PM #720193
    patientrenter
    Participant

    RP is not the most popular politician out there, nor are his positions universally acceptable. Yet he is very popular, and many do agree with some of his positions. Having said all that, what he advocates would badly dent the pockets of the (bipartisan) community that runs Wall Street and Washington DC. The media – and other Congressmen – don’t bite the hand that feeds them.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:59 PM #720285
    patientrenter
    Participant

    RP is not the most popular politician out there, nor are his positions universally acceptable. Yet he is very popular, and many do agree with some of his positions. Having said all that, what he advocates would badly dent the pockets of the (bipartisan) community that runs Wall Street and Washington DC. The media – and other Congressmen – don’t bite the hand that feeds them.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:59 PM #720885
    patientrenter
    Participant

    RP is not the most popular politician out there, nor are his positions universally acceptable. Yet he is very popular, and many do agree with some of his positions. Having said all that, what he advocates would badly dent the pockets of the (bipartisan) community that runs Wall Street and Washington DC. The media – and other Congressmen – don’t bite the hand that feeds them.

    August 16, 2011 at 8:59 PM #721042
    patientrenter
    Participant

    RP is not the most popular politician out there, nor are his positions universally acceptable. Yet he is very popular, and many do agree with some of his positions. Having said all that, what he advocates would badly dent the pockets of the (bipartisan) community that runs Wall Street and Washington DC. The media – and other Congressmen – don’t bite the hand that feeds them.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,077 total)
1 2 3 … 7 8 9 … 70 71 72
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.