- This topic has 1,076 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 5 months ago by markmax33.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM #721237August 16, 2011 at 1:28 PM #720031briansd1Guest
[quote=pri_dk].
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
[/quote]Some of his ideas like legalizing drugs do make sense.
Abolishing the Federal Reserve and going back to the gold-standard don’t make much sense, IMHO.
I don’t follow RP so I don’t really know what his platform is. How does Ron Paul compare to his Tea Party son, Rand Paul?
August 16, 2011 at 1:28 PM #720123briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk].
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
[/quote]Some of his ideas like legalizing drugs do make sense.
Abolishing the Federal Reserve and going back to the gold-standard don’t make much sense, IMHO.
I don’t follow RP so I don’t really know what his platform is. How does Ron Paul compare to his Tea Party son, Rand Paul?
August 16, 2011 at 1:28 PM #720723briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk].
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
[/quote]Some of his ideas like legalizing drugs do make sense.
Abolishing the Federal Reserve and going back to the gold-standard don’t make much sense, IMHO.
I don’t follow RP so I don’t really know what his platform is. How does Ron Paul compare to his Tea Party son, Rand Paul?
August 16, 2011 at 1:28 PM #720878briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk].
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
[/quote]Some of his ideas like legalizing drugs do make sense.
Abolishing the Federal Reserve and going back to the gold-standard don’t make much sense, IMHO.
I don’t follow RP so I don’t really know what his platform is. How does Ron Paul compare to his Tea Party son, Rand Paul?
August 16, 2011 at 1:28 PM #721242briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk].
Plus he just doesn’t have media appeal. Although some of his ideas may make sense, he just comes across as another also-ran oddball.
[/quote]Some of his ideas like legalizing drugs do make sense.
Abolishing the Federal Reserve and going back to the gold-standard don’t make much sense, IMHO.
I don’t follow RP so I don’t really know what his platform is. How does Ron Paul compare to his Tea Party son, Rand Paul?
August 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM #720041jpinpbParticipantI just have such a hard time seriously considering Ron Paul mostly b/c of his stand on abortion.
And during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.
Off the top of my head, molar pregnancy comes to mind. I’m sure there are other situations, circumstances, instances and complications that can occur during a pregnancy.
Ron Paul is ardent on his stand on abortion. This is where I disagree w/him. Women should have a choice and when it comes to their health, particularly when in jeopardy, they should have that option w/out the government telling them it’s illegal. Having an abortion is not a decision that comes lightly for women and the government making it illegal is not going to help women in need.
I personally am sad for any woman who has to have an abortion for whatever reason. Nevertheless, that should be their personal decision and not illegal.
August 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM #720133jpinpbParticipantI just have such a hard time seriously considering Ron Paul mostly b/c of his stand on abortion.
And during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.
Off the top of my head, molar pregnancy comes to mind. I’m sure there are other situations, circumstances, instances and complications that can occur during a pregnancy.
Ron Paul is ardent on his stand on abortion. This is where I disagree w/him. Women should have a choice and when it comes to their health, particularly when in jeopardy, they should have that option w/out the government telling them it’s illegal. Having an abortion is not a decision that comes lightly for women and the government making it illegal is not going to help women in need.
I personally am sad for any woman who has to have an abortion for whatever reason. Nevertheless, that should be their personal decision and not illegal.
August 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM #720732jpinpbParticipantI just have such a hard time seriously considering Ron Paul mostly b/c of his stand on abortion.
And during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.
Off the top of my head, molar pregnancy comes to mind. I’m sure there are other situations, circumstances, instances and complications that can occur during a pregnancy.
Ron Paul is ardent on his stand on abortion. This is where I disagree w/him. Women should have a choice and when it comes to their health, particularly when in jeopardy, they should have that option w/out the government telling them it’s illegal. Having an abortion is not a decision that comes lightly for women and the government making it illegal is not going to help women in need.
I personally am sad for any woman who has to have an abortion for whatever reason. Nevertheless, that should be their personal decision and not illegal.
August 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM #720888jpinpbParticipantI just have such a hard time seriously considering Ron Paul mostly b/c of his stand on abortion.
And during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.
Off the top of my head, molar pregnancy comes to mind. I’m sure there are other situations, circumstances, instances and complications that can occur during a pregnancy.
Ron Paul is ardent on his stand on abortion. This is where I disagree w/him. Women should have a choice and when it comes to their health, particularly when in jeopardy, they should have that option w/out the government telling them it’s illegal. Having an abortion is not a decision that comes lightly for women and the government making it illegal is not going to help women in need.
I personally am sad for any woman who has to have an abortion for whatever reason. Nevertheless, that should be their personal decision and not illegal.
August 16, 2011 at 1:43 PM #721252jpinpbParticipantI just have such a hard time seriously considering Ron Paul mostly b/c of his stand on abortion.
And during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.
Off the top of my head, molar pregnancy comes to mind. I’m sure there are other situations, circumstances, instances and complications that can occur during a pregnancy.
Ron Paul is ardent on his stand on abortion. This is where I disagree w/him. Women should have a choice and when it comes to their health, particularly when in jeopardy, they should have that option w/out the government telling them it’s illegal. Having an abortion is not a decision that comes lightly for women and the government making it illegal is not going to help women in need.
I personally am sad for any woman who has to have an abortion for whatever reason. Nevertheless, that should be their personal decision and not illegal.
August 16, 2011 at 2:11 PM #720051scaredyclassicParticipantI think Ron Paul published weird newsletters on the 70s which he now claims he didn’t write or even edit.
August 16, 2011 at 2:11 PM #720143scaredyclassicParticipantI think Ron Paul published weird newsletters on the 70s which he now claims he didn’t write or even edit.
August 16, 2011 at 2:11 PM #720742scaredyclassicParticipantI think Ron Paul published weird newsletters on the 70s which he now claims he didn’t write or even edit.
August 16, 2011 at 2:11 PM #720898scaredyclassicParticipantI think Ron Paul published weird newsletters on the 70s which he now claims he didn’t write or even edit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.