Menu

Home › Forums › Other › Ignore Ron Paul are the new marching orders?

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,077 total)
1 2 3 … 11 12 13 … 70 71 72
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 17, 2011 at 8:43 AM #721474
    jpinpb
    Participant

    There are important issues that should occupy a President and abortion rights should not be one of them. It’s been almost a 40 year battle. I would love for a candidate to say they will not take a stand on it and he has greater concerns for our country than that. There are more pressing issues than whether a woman has the right to terminate a pregnancy, especially when life is at risk. It needs to be put to rest. As a personal choice, it’s not one I would relish to experience. But that is the point of all of this. It should be a personal decision, not one mandated by government.

    I’m not saying free for all for anything. There are laws allowing medical marijuana. Yet they are still trying to ban abortions.

    But back to the topic, it does appear RP is being ignored by the media. Perhaps the media are not liking him enough to give him attention, despite the popularity of votes. Perhaps the other candidates are donating sums of money to the media for their spot in the limelight.

    August 17, 2011 at 8:47 AM #720268
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=CONCHO]Certainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.

    It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.[/quote]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.

    August 17, 2011 at 8:47 AM #720360
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=CONCHO]Certainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.

    It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.[/quote]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.

    August 17, 2011 at 8:47 AM #720958
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=CONCHO]Certainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.

    It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.[/quote]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.

    August 17, 2011 at 8:47 AM #721116
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=CONCHO]Certainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.

    It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.[/quote]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.

    August 17, 2011 at 8:47 AM #721479
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=CONCHO]Certainly one could never vote for a presidential candidate who holds any different views than your own. Everyone knows that if the president wants to, he can instantly change the laws to reflect his personal views. If you are pro-choice, never ever ever vote for someone who is pro-life because if they are elected abortions will immediately become illegal. Conversely, if you are pro-life but vote for a pro-choice president, the day they take office there will be free abortion clinics on every corner.

    It is easy to choose who to vote for. Just choose the person who says the most pleasing things, the things that disturb you the least.[/quote]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM #720273
    blahblahblah
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM #720365
    blahblahblah
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM #720963
    blahblahblah
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM #721121
    blahblahblah
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:07 AM #721484
    blahblahblah
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]
    Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    Exactly! That is why they can instantly change any law they want to. When they are elected they can immediately appoint all new supreme court justices who then go to work the next day and change all the laws.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:08 AM #720278
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    That is the reason that a candidate is questioned about their stand on it, and gun laws, etc. Anything that can impact the SC and laws. It would be nice if there were a way to say that after 40 years or 50 years the law is the law. People keep their guns and personal health issues should be between patient and doctor, not micromanaged by government.

    In any case, back to RP. It does appear he is glossed over.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:08 AM #720370
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    That is the reason that a candidate is questioned about their stand on it, and gun laws, etc. Anything that can impact the SC and laws. It would be nice if there were a way to say that after 40 years or 50 years the law is the law. People keep their guns and personal health issues should be between patient and doctor, not micromanaged by government.

    In any case, back to RP. It does appear he is glossed over.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:08 AM #720968
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    That is the reason that a candidate is questioned about their stand on it, and gun laws, etc. Anything that can impact the SC and laws. It would be nice if there were a way to say that after 40 years or 50 years the law is the law. People keep their guns and personal health issues should be between patient and doctor, not micromanaged by government.

    In any case, back to RP. It does appear he is glossed over.

    August 17, 2011 at 9:08 AM #721126
    jpinpb
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Presidents nominate supreme court justices.[/quote]

    That is the reason that a candidate is questioned about their stand on it, and gun laws, etc. Anything that can impact the SC and laws. It would be nice if there were a way to say that after 40 years or 50 years the law is the law. People keep their guns and personal health issues should be between patient and doctor, not micromanaged by government.

    In any case, back to RP. It does appear he is glossed over.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,077 total)
1 2 3 … 11 12 13 … 70 71 72
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.