Ignore Ron Paul are the new marching orders?

[an]

[quote=briansd1]RP being consistently wrong is not confidence inspiring.

Abolishing the Federal Reserve and letting individual banks issue notes does not make me feel financially secure.

I think that it’s important to change strategies to match new facts and realities. Isn’t it stupid to insist that the earth is flat when all the evidence points to it being round?[/quote]
Wrong to you, right for others. Consistency and predictability is much better than flip flopper.

[blahblahblah]

RP will not win. They have played and exhausted the “ignore” card. Now they will play the “attack” card. Soon we will hear that he is a racist who worships Aqua Buddha. If that does not fix the problem, they will play the “Diebold” card.

[blahblahblah]

RP will not win. They have played and exhausted the “ignore” card. Now they will play the “attack” card. Soon we will hear that he is a racist who worships Aqua Buddha. If that does not fix the problem, they will play the “Diebold” card.

[blahblahblah]

RP will not win. They have played and exhausted the “ignore” card. Now they will play the “attack” card. Soon we will hear that he is a racist who worships Aqua Buddha. If that does not fix the problem, they will play the “Diebold” card.

[blahblahblah]

RP will not win. They have played and exhausted the “ignore” card. Now they will play the “attack” card. Soon we will hear that he is a racist who worships Aqua Buddha. If that does not fix the problem, they will play the “Diebold” card.

[blahblahblah]

RP will not win. They have played and exhausted the “ignore” card. Now they will play the “attack” card. Soon we will hear that he is a racist who worships Aqua Buddha. If that does not fix the problem, they will play the “Diebold” card.

[briansd1]

[quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.

[briansd1]

[quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.

[briansd1]

[quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.

[briansd1]

[quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.

[briansd1]

[quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.

[aldante]

[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.[/quote]

Here is the Secretary of HUD on the causes of the collapse on 4/4/2010.

http://www.mhmarketingsalesmanagement.com/downloads/mharr/HUDsSecretary-04-14-2010-testimony.pdf
Again I noticed you fail to mention that RP was right 5 years before the collapse. So annoying Brian1

[aldante]

[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.[/quote]

Here is the Secretary of HUD on the causes of the collapse on 4/4/2010.

http://www.mhmarketingsalesmanagement.com/downloads/mharr/HUDsSecretary-04-14-2010-testimony.pdf
Again I noticed you fail to mention that RP was right 5 years before the collapse. So annoying Brian1

[aldante]

[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.[/quote]

Here is the Secretary of HUD on the causes of the collapse on 4/4/2010.

http://www.mhmarketingsalesmanagement.com/downloads/mharr/HUDsSecretary-04-14-2010-testimony.pdf
Again I noticed you fail to mention that RP was right 5 years before the collapse. So annoying Brian1

[aldante]

[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante] Brian are you maintaining that private securitziation could have reached those insane levels with out the backstop of the GSE’s? That sounds like a “world is flat” comment given the evidence.[/quote]

I think that you need to study the details of the bubble and the collapse.

The Treasury and the Fed backstopped the banks directly, not through the GSEs.

What allowed the crazy securition was not the GSEs, but the rating agencies rating all those securities AAA.

Only after the collapse, did the GSEs take on a more prominent role in stabilizing the market.[/quote]

Here is the Secretary of HUD on the causes of the collapse on 4/4/2010.

http://www.mhmarketingsalesmanagement.com/downloads/mharr/HUDsSecretary-04-14-2010-testimony.pdf
Again I noticed you fail to mention that RP was right 5 years before the collapse. So annoying Brian1

[Author]

Posts