Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US

[afx114]

Exactly. Palin wouldn’t even be on the ticket if Hilary was in the VP slot. Why didn’t they pick Hutchison or Snowe, two far more qualified (and less-controversial) candidates? Palin is a purely political pandering move. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but at least call it what it is.

[jficquette]

Arraya,

This statement here:

“Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in
common: their gender and their good looks. :)”

Makes me think it just junk in this letter. For one thing, Hillary is ugly as sin. Take it from there.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

This statement here:

“Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in
common: their gender and their good looks. :)”

Makes me think it just junk in this letter. For one thing, Hillary is ugly as sin. Take it from there.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

This statement here:

“Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in
common: their gender and their good looks. :)”

Makes me think it just junk in this letter. For one thing, Hillary is ugly as sin. Take it from there.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

This statement here:

“Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in
common: their gender and their good looks. :)”

Makes me think it just junk in this letter. For one thing, Hillary is ugly as sin. Take it from there.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

This statement here:

“Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in
common: their gender and their good looks. :)”

Makes me think it just junk in this letter. For one thing, Hillary is ugly as sin. Take it from there.

John

[gracie]

What scares me most about Palin is that if something happened to McCain…she would be President. McCain is not a spring chicken AND he has had serious health problems.

Who is Palin? And would you feel confortable with her being President…especially with her record and truly fanatical ideas?
She scares me and I am angry that Mccain would choose someone like her to be his running mate.

I am now voting Democratic!

[gracie]

What scares me most about Palin is that if something happened to McCain…she would be President. McCain is not a spring chicken AND he has had serious health problems.

Who is Palin? And would you feel confortable with her being President…especially with her record and truly fanatical ideas?
She scares me and I am angry that Mccain would choose someone like her to be his running mate.

I am now voting Democratic!

[gracie]

What scares me most about Palin is that if something happened to McCain…she would be President. McCain is not a spring chicken AND he has had serious health problems.

Who is Palin? And would you feel confortable with her being President…especially with her record and truly fanatical ideas?
She scares me and I am angry that Mccain would choose someone like her to be his running mate.

I am now voting Democratic!

[gracie]

What scares me most about Palin is that if something happened to McCain…she would be President. McCain is not a spring chicken AND he has had serious health problems.

Who is Palin? And would you feel confortable with her being President…especially with her record and truly fanatical ideas?
She scares me and I am angry that Mccain would choose someone like her to be his running mate.

I am now voting Democratic!

[gracie]

What scares me most about Palin is that if something happened to McCain…she would be President. McCain is not a spring chicken AND he has had serious health problems.

Who is Palin? And would you feel confortable with her being President…especially with her record and truly fanatical ideas?
She scares me and I am angry that Mccain would choose someone like her to be his running mate.

I am now voting Democratic!

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Author]

Posts