- This topic has 620 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 14, 2011 at 6:08 PM #655183January 14, 2011 at 7:14 PM #654084allParticipant
[quote=faterikcartman]
Ah yes, just like banning drugs keeps them out of the hands of users.
[/quote]
Not really. Drugs and guns are consumed in different ways.[quote=faterikcartman]
Japan is to a large extent a closed society even today. It does not have a porous border it shares with anyone. It has a fairly homogeneous culture and ethnic makeup. It’s police and justice system is quite different from our own. The Japanese have a more limited history of freedom.
[/quote]
Hence my example of Germany, a country with a porous border and large immigration population.[quote=faterikcartman]
Regarding Mexico, your statement is completely misleading. http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_16970014?source=rss%5B/quote%5D
[/quote]
I was responding to this.[quote=CONCHO]
I think firearms should be illegal here just like in Mexico. Then we will be able to enjoy the same high levels of safety that the Mexican people have.
[/quote]Read more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_MexicoJanuary 14, 2011 at 7:14 PM #654149allParticipant[quote=faterikcartman]
Ah yes, just like banning drugs keeps them out of the hands of users.
[/quote]
Not really. Drugs and guns are consumed in different ways.[quote=faterikcartman]
Japan is to a large extent a closed society even today. It does not have a porous border it shares with anyone. It has a fairly homogeneous culture and ethnic makeup. It’s police and justice system is quite different from our own. The Japanese have a more limited history of freedom.
[/quote]
Hence my example of Germany, a country with a porous border and large immigration population.[quote=faterikcartman]
Regarding Mexico, your statement is completely misleading. http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_16970014?source=rss%5B/quote%5D
[/quote]
I was responding to this.[quote=CONCHO]
I think firearms should be illegal here just like in Mexico. Then we will be able to enjoy the same high levels of safety that the Mexican people have.
[/quote]Read more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_MexicoJanuary 14, 2011 at 7:14 PM #654736allParticipant[quote=faterikcartman]
Ah yes, just like banning drugs keeps them out of the hands of users.
[/quote]
Not really. Drugs and guns are consumed in different ways.[quote=faterikcartman]
Japan is to a large extent a closed society even today. It does not have a porous border it shares with anyone. It has a fairly homogeneous culture and ethnic makeup. It’s police and justice system is quite different from our own. The Japanese have a more limited history of freedom.
[/quote]
Hence my example of Germany, a country with a porous border and large immigration population.[quote=faterikcartman]
Regarding Mexico, your statement is completely misleading. http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_16970014?source=rss%5B/quote%5D
[/quote]
I was responding to this.[quote=CONCHO]
I think firearms should be illegal here just like in Mexico. Then we will be able to enjoy the same high levels of safety that the Mexican people have.
[/quote]Read more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_MexicoJanuary 14, 2011 at 7:14 PM #654873allParticipant[quote=faterikcartman]
Ah yes, just like banning drugs keeps them out of the hands of users.
[/quote]
Not really. Drugs and guns are consumed in different ways.[quote=faterikcartman]
Japan is to a large extent a closed society even today. It does not have a porous border it shares with anyone. It has a fairly homogeneous culture and ethnic makeup. It’s police and justice system is quite different from our own. The Japanese have a more limited history of freedom.
[/quote]
Hence my example of Germany, a country with a porous border and large immigration population.[quote=faterikcartman]
Regarding Mexico, your statement is completely misleading. http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_16970014?source=rss%5B/quote%5D
[/quote]
I was responding to this.[quote=CONCHO]
I think firearms should be illegal here just like in Mexico. Then we will be able to enjoy the same high levels of safety that the Mexican people have.
[/quote]Read more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_MexicoJanuary 14, 2011 at 7:14 PM #655203allParticipant[quote=faterikcartman]
Ah yes, just like banning drugs keeps them out of the hands of users.
[/quote]
Not really. Drugs and guns are consumed in different ways.[quote=faterikcartman]
Japan is to a large extent a closed society even today. It does not have a porous border it shares with anyone. It has a fairly homogeneous culture and ethnic makeup. It’s police and justice system is quite different from our own. The Japanese have a more limited history of freedom.
[/quote]
Hence my example of Germany, a country with a porous border and large immigration population.[quote=faterikcartman]
Regarding Mexico, your statement is completely misleading. http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_16970014?source=rss%5B/quote%5D
[/quote]
I was responding to this.[quote=CONCHO]
I think firearms should be illegal here just like in Mexico. Then we will be able to enjoy the same high levels of safety that the Mexican people have.
[/quote]Read more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_MexicoJanuary 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM #654089allParticipant[quote=desmond]Cap,
Instead of making things up: “And if you do have access to your weapon you are more likely to get hurt if you try to use it. If an armed robber is in your house he will run if you start yelling how you have a gun and you called the police. And the robber is more likely to shoot back if you start shooting” pure B.S.
Why not refer to the recent Arizona shootings when a legal gun carrying citizen did not use his gun and instead tackled and held the criminal shooter. The gun carrying citizen was able to make a rational decision and choose a physical takedown instead of using his gun. Again, the only person using his gun was the criminal.[/quote]
So the benefit of easy access to guns is exactly what?
January 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM #654154allParticipant[quote=desmond]Cap,
Instead of making things up: “And if you do have access to your weapon you are more likely to get hurt if you try to use it. If an armed robber is in your house he will run if you start yelling how you have a gun and you called the police. And the robber is more likely to shoot back if you start shooting” pure B.S.
Why not refer to the recent Arizona shootings when a legal gun carrying citizen did not use his gun and instead tackled and held the criminal shooter. The gun carrying citizen was able to make a rational decision and choose a physical takedown instead of using his gun. Again, the only person using his gun was the criminal.[/quote]
So the benefit of easy access to guns is exactly what?
January 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM #654741allParticipant[quote=desmond]Cap,
Instead of making things up: “And if you do have access to your weapon you are more likely to get hurt if you try to use it. If an armed robber is in your house he will run if you start yelling how you have a gun and you called the police. And the robber is more likely to shoot back if you start shooting” pure B.S.
Why not refer to the recent Arizona shootings when a legal gun carrying citizen did not use his gun and instead tackled and held the criminal shooter. The gun carrying citizen was able to make a rational decision and choose a physical takedown instead of using his gun. Again, the only person using his gun was the criminal.[/quote]
So the benefit of easy access to guns is exactly what?
January 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM #654878allParticipant[quote=desmond]Cap,
Instead of making things up: “And if you do have access to your weapon you are more likely to get hurt if you try to use it. If an armed robber is in your house he will run if you start yelling how you have a gun and you called the police. And the robber is more likely to shoot back if you start shooting” pure B.S.
Why not refer to the recent Arizona shootings when a legal gun carrying citizen did not use his gun and instead tackled and held the criminal shooter. The gun carrying citizen was able to make a rational decision and choose a physical takedown instead of using his gun. Again, the only person using his gun was the criminal.[/quote]
So the benefit of easy access to guns is exactly what?
January 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM #655208allParticipant[quote=desmond]Cap,
Instead of making things up: “And if you do have access to your weapon you are more likely to get hurt if you try to use it. If an armed robber is in your house he will run if you start yelling how you have a gun and you called the police. And the robber is more likely to shoot back if you start shooting” pure B.S.
Why not refer to the recent Arizona shootings when a legal gun carrying citizen did not use his gun and instead tackled and held the criminal shooter. The gun carrying citizen was able to make a rational decision and choose a physical takedown instead of using his gun. Again, the only person using his gun was the criminal.[/quote]
So the benefit of easy access to guns is exactly what?
January 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM #654167faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=Djshakes][quote=Djshakes]
I don’t buy guns to fight against the government. Anyone with that mentality is retarded. [/quote]I retract this after reading the last post, which was great. It is hard for anyone to make cries of “conspiracy nut” after ready fatericcartmen’s post. To some, everyone that thinks that way is a conspiracy nut…until it happens.
Case and point. My buddy lives in Santa Monica surrounded by libs. A couple of his neighbors found out he had some guns and scoffed at him. Then the riots broke out and I believe Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton or someone said something to the regards of “The three B’s are next”. Meaning Brentwood, Beverly hills and another city in the area. This scared people. He told me those same snobby libs that scoffed at him now approached him fearful of the situation and said “You have guns, right?” FU was his response.[/quote]
Doh! Missed this one in my haste to respond earlier. Thank you and my apologies as I think I quoted your first quote here.
January 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM #654232faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=Djshakes][quote=Djshakes]
I don’t buy guns to fight against the government. Anyone with that mentality is retarded. [/quote]I retract this after reading the last post, which was great. It is hard for anyone to make cries of “conspiracy nut” after ready fatericcartmen’s post. To some, everyone that thinks that way is a conspiracy nut…until it happens.
Case and point. My buddy lives in Santa Monica surrounded by libs. A couple of his neighbors found out he had some guns and scoffed at him. Then the riots broke out and I believe Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton or someone said something to the regards of “The three B’s are next”. Meaning Brentwood, Beverly hills and another city in the area. This scared people. He told me those same snobby libs that scoffed at him now approached him fearful of the situation and said “You have guns, right?” FU was his response.[/quote]
Doh! Missed this one in my haste to respond earlier. Thank you and my apologies as I think I quoted your first quote here.
January 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM #654820faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=Djshakes][quote=Djshakes]
I don’t buy guns to fight against the government. Anyone with that mentality is retarded. [/quote]I retract this after reading the last post, which was great. It is hard for anyone to make cries of “conspiracy nut” after ready fatericcartmen’s post. To some, everyone that thinks that way is a conspiracy nut…until it happens.
Case and point. My buddy lives in Santa Monica surrounded by libs. A couple of his neighbors found out he had some guns and scoffed at him. Then the riots broke out and I believe Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton or someone said something to the regards of “The three B’s are next”. Meaning Brentwood, Beverly hills and another city in the area. This scared people. He told me those same snobby libs that scoffed at him now approached him fearful of the situation and said “You have guns, right?” FU was his response.[/quote]
Doh! Missed this one in my haste to respond earlier. Thank you and my apologies as I think I quoted your first quote here.
January 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM #654958faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=Djshakes][quote=Djshakes]
I don’t buy guns to fight against the government. Anyone with that mentality is retarded. [/quote]I retract this after reading the last post, which was great. It is hard for anyone to make cries of “conspiracy nut” after ready fatericcartmen’s post. To some, everyone that thinks that way is a conspiracy nut…until it happens.
Case and point. My buddy lives in Santa Monica surrounded by libs. A couple of his neighbors found out he had some guns and scoffed at him. Then the riots broke out and I believe Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton or someone said something to the regards of “The three B’s are next”. Meaning Brentwood, Beverly hills and another city in the area. This scared people. He told me those same snobby libs that scoffed at him now approached him fearful of the situation and said “You have guns, right?” FU was his response.[/quote]
Doh! Missed this one in my haste to respond earlier. Thank you and my apologies as I think I quoted your first quote here.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.