OT – Whitman Hired Illegal Worker

[scaredyclassic]

You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.

[eavesdropper]

[quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?

[eavesdropper]

[quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.

[Coronita]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.[/quote]

Can I be in charge of the Worker’s Union Advocacy Group and Task Force for Fair Compensation (WUAGTFFC)? My first call to action would be to put in place the following efficient management structure to manage 5 people to do the actual work….

1 shift supervisor
1 shift supervisor’s supervisor
1 associate project manager
1 associate program manager
1 senior project manager
1 senior program manager
1 director of operations that both the senior project manager and program manager report to
I’m fine with the director of operations reporting to me.

I have no idea yet what the actual 5 people will be working on. But I’m confident that regardless of the work, we need 5 people to do the actual work, and the aforementioned efficient management team (EMT) to manage tasks such as encouraging 5 people to think of ideas of what movie/show to make, screwing in lightbulbs, etc.

Also, while we are at it, let’s schedule a meeting to discuss when we should have the next meeting to discuss how we should plan to run a business at the next meeting.

Thank you for your cooperation…

-Flu,
VP of Union Affairs

[Coronita]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.[/quote]

Can I be in charge of the Worker’s Union Advocacy Group and Task Force for Fair Compensation (WUAGTFFC)? My first call to action would be to put in place the following efficient management structure to manage 5 people to do the actual work….

1 shift supervisor
1 shift supervisor’s supervisor
1 associate project manager
1 associate program manager
1 senior project manager
1 senior program manager
1 director of operations that both the senior project manager and program manager report to
I’m fine with the director of operations reporting to me.

I have no idea yet what the actual 5 people will be working on. But I’m confident that regardless of the work, we need 5 people to do the actual work, and the aforementioned efficient management team (EMT) to manage tasks such as encouraging 5 people to think of ideas of what movie/show to make, screwing in lightbulbs, etc.

Also, while we are at it, let’s schedule a meeting to discuss when we should have the next meeting to discuss how we should plan to run a business at the next meeting.

Thank you for your cooperation…

-Flu,
VP of Union Affairs

[Coronita]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.[/quote]

Can I be in charge of the Worker’s Union Advocacy Group and Task Force for Fair Compensation (WUAGTFFC)? My first call to action would be to put in place the following efficient management structure to manage 5 people to do the actual work….

1 shift supervisor
1 shift supervisor’s supervisor
1 associate project manager
1 associate program manager
1 senior project manager
1 senior program manager
1 director of operations that both the senior project manager and program manager report to
I’m fine with the director of operations reporting to me.

I have no idea yet what the actual 5 people will be working on. But I’m confident that regardless of the work, we need 5 people to do the actual work, and the aforementioned efficient management team (EMT) to manage tasks such as encouraging 5 people to think of ideas of what movie/show to make, screwing in lightbulbs, etc.

Also, while we are at it, let’s schedule a meeting to discuss when we should have the next meeting to discuss how we should plan to run a business at the next meeting.

Thank you for your cooperation…

-Flu,
VP of Union Affairs

[Coronita]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=eavesdropper][quote=walterwhite]You guys are making me feel bad for not actually producing anything. But at least I’m not blaming any particular group for anything. I like me life; I’m just maybe perhaps useless.[/quote]

Don’t feel bad. You keep us entertained AND informed. And we’re a tough room.

You can be the Human Resources Director at the new network. How’s that sound?[/quote]

Eavesdropper: You’re getting a little ahead of yourself here, Sunshine. Before you start handing out jobs, willy-nilly, I think we should form an executive group first. Actually, I think we should form a junta (or a cabal; I’ve always wanted to be part of a cabal) and start appointing various minions, cohorts and henchpersons.

For the record, I have no issue with Scaredy being in charge of HR, although I remain concerned about his various, changing monikers. That might presage some sort of psychotic break with reality. Although, with this group, that’s probably not a deal-breaker.[/quote]

Can I be in charge of the Worker’s Union Advocacy Group and Task Force for Fair Compensation (WUAGTFFC)? My first call to action would be to put in place the following efficient management structure to manage 5 people to do the actual work….

1 shift supervisor
1 shift supervisor’s supervisor
1 associate project manager
1 associate program manager
1 senior project manager
1 senior program manager
1 director of operations that both the senior project manager and program manager report to
I’m fine with the director of operations reporting to me.

I have no idea yet what the actual 5 people will be working on. But I’m confident that regardless of the work, we need 5 people to do the actual work, and the aforementioned efficient management team (EMT) to manage tasks such as encouraging 5 people to think of ideas of what movie/show to make, screwing in lightbulbs, etc.

Also, while we are at it, let’s schedule a meeting to discuss when we should have the next meeting to discuss how we should plan to run a business at the next meeting.

Thank you for your cooperation…

-Flu,
VP of Union Affairs

[Author]

Posts