OT: Gay History in California Public Schools

[Shadowfax]

I am not responsible for the journalistic quality of the article. I went for the quick, approachable source, but I see you are going to need some serious convincing. Here is a more scholarly source:

http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html

It’s not proven at this point, but there is strong evidence that most of one’s sexual preference is genetic.

[briansd1]

Let’s assume for a minute that Rus is correct and that sexual orientation is influenced by environmental factors as well as genetics.

So what? So some incremental number of children will turn out gay. What’s the harm?

Clearly, people turn out straight because society has a straight bias.

Our current system does more harm because it keeps gays in the shadows and we discriminate against them. Many children and adults are dissuaded from pursuing their gay inclinations leading to mal-adjustment, depression and suicide.

What’s wrong with telling children and adults that gays exist and can be very happy, well-adjusted people who contribute to society.

What’s wrong with telling kids that some of their classmates have two dads or two moms? I understand some parents don’t like it. But they don’t have a choice. Gays are fact of life. We need to teach kids about facts of life.

Nobody is pushing a gay agenda since nobody is claiming that being gay is preferable to being straight.

There is a strong straight agenda for sure.

[briansd1]

Let’s assume for a minute that Rus is correct and that sexual orientation is influenced by environmental factors as well as genetics.

So what? So some incremental number of children will turn out gay. What’s the harm?

Clearly, people turn out straight because society has a straight bias.

Our current system does more harm because it keeps gays in the shadows and we discriminate against them. Many children and adults are dissuaded from pursuing their gay inclinations leading to mal-adjustment, depression and suicide.

What’s wrong with telling children and adults that gays exist and can be very happy, well-adjusted people who contribute to society.

What’s wrong with telling kids that some of their classmates have two dads or two moms? I understand some parents don’t like it. But they don’t have a choice. Gays are fact of life. We need to teach kids about facts of life.

Nobody is pushing a gay agenda since nobody is claiming that being gay is preferable to being straight.

There is a strong straight agenda for sure.

[briansd1]

Let’s assume for a minute that Rus is correct and that sexual orientation is influenced by environmental factors as well as genetics.

So what? So some incremental number of children will turn out gay. What’s the harm?

Clearly, people turn out straight because society has a straight bias.

Our current system does more harm because it keeps gays in the shadows and we discriminate against them. Many children and adults are dissuaded from pursuing their gay inclinations leading to mal-adjustment, depression and suicide.

What’s wrong with telling children and adults that gays exist and can be very happy, well-adjusted people who contribute to society.

What’s wrong with telling kids that some of their classmates have two dads or two moms? I understand some parents don’t like it. But they don’t have a choice. Gays are fact of life. We need to teach kids about facts of life.

Nobody is pushing a gay agenda since nobody is claiming that being gay is preferable to being straight.

There is a strong straight agenda for sure.

[briansd1]

Let’s assume for a minute that Rus is correct and that sexual orientation is influenced by environmental factors as well as genetics.

So what? So some incremental number of children will turn out gay. What’s the harm?

Clearly, people turn out straight because society has a straight bias.

Our current system does more harm because it keeps gays in the shadows and we discriminate against them. Many children and adults are dissuaded from pursuing their gay inclinations leading to mal-adjustment, depression and suicide.

What’s wrong with telling children and adults that gays exist and can be very happy, well-adjusted people who contribute to society.

What’s wrong with telling kids that some of their classmates have two dads or two moms? I understand some parents don’t like it. But they don’t have a choice. Gays are fact of life. We need to teach kids about facts of life.

Nobody is pushing a gay agenda since nobody is claiming that being gay is preferable to being straight.

There is a strong straight agenda for sure.

[briansd1]

Let’s assume for a minute that Rus is correct and that sexual orientation is influenced by environmental factors as well as genetics.

So what? So some incremental number of children will turn out gay. What’s the harm?

Clearly, people turn out straight because society has a straight bias.

Our current system does more harm because it keeps gays in the shadows and we discriminate against them. Many children and adults are dissuaded from pursuing their gay inclinations leading to mal-adjustment, depression and suicide.

What’s wrong with telling children and adults that gays exist and can be very happy, well-adjusted people who contribute to society.

What’s wrong with telling kids that some of their classmates have two dads or two moms? I understand some parents don’t like it. But they don’t have a choice. Gays are fact of life. We need to teach kids about facts of life.

Nobody is pushing a gay agenda since nobody is claiming that being gay is preferable to being straight.

There is a strong straight agenda for sure.

[scaredyclassic]

id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?

[scaredyclassic]

id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?

[scaredyclassic]

id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?

[scaredyclassic]

id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?

[scaredyclassic]

id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?[/quote]

I think a particular parrot will.

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=17468

Read and be pleased.
Or horrified.
Or stimulated.
Ewww.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?[/quote]

I think a particular parrot will.

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=17468

Read and be pleased.
Or horrified.
Or stimulated.
Ewww.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?[/quote]

I think a particular parrot will.

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=17468

Read and be pleased.
Or horrified.
Or stimulated.
Ewww.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]id like to see more of a pro-masturbation agenda. it just seems healthier. who will speak for the onanists?[/quote]

I think a particular parrot will.

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=17468

Read and be pleased.
Or horrified.
Or stimulated.
Ewww.

[Author]

Posts