OT: Gay History in California Public Schools

[Shadowfax]

Rus, no it’s really not about a developmental moment.
They are not far from finding genetic links to being gay or straight.

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=4529843

I do have a sibling who is lesbian and she tried to date guys but nothing ever clicked for her until she kissed a girl. (God, I hate that Katy Perry song.) It seems that for so many it really is a question of you are or you aren’t.

[NotCranky]

[quote=Shadowfax]Rus, no it’s really not about a developmental moment.
They are not far from finding genetic links to being gay or straight.

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=4529843

I do have a sibling who is lesbian and she tried to date guys but nothing ever clicked for her until she kissed a girl. (God, I hate that Katy Perry song.) It seems that for so many it really is a question of you are or you aren’t.[/quote]
C’mon Shadowfax, That ABC article is terrible to use as proof of near scientific proof of a genetic link.

A couple of parents of gay kids give weak excuses to believe it was in the kid’s dna? Then a few contradictory Scientist comments equating ot a disclaimer for the whole theory?

Here is one woman in the article who believes in the DNA link, talking about her 3 year old son:

“We would play king and queen and of course, I was the king and he was the queen, you know,” said his mom, laughing. Maybe the mom was just really anxious to play king and emasculate her 3 year old son. Could she try any harder? Sounds like a whack job mom to me. She now believes it was in the boy’s dna. What does that have to do with scientific proof. This piece in nearer to pure propaganda.

[NotCranky]

[quote=Shadowfax]Rus, no it’s really not about a developmental moment.
They are not far from finding genetic links to being gay or straight.

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=4529843

I do have a sibling who is lesbian and she tried to date guys but nothing ever clicked for her until she kissed a girl. (God, I hate that Katy Perry song.) It seems that for so many it really is a question of you are or you aren’t.[/quote]
C’mon Shadowfax, That ABC article is terrible to use as proof of near scientific proof of a genetic link.

A couple of parents of gay kids give weak excuses to believe it was in the kid’s dna? Then a few contradictory Scientist comments equating ot a disclaimer for the whole theory?

Here is one woman in the article who believes in the DNA link, talking about her 3 year old son:

“We would play king and queen and of course, I was the king and he was the queen, you know,” said his mom, laughing. Maybe the mom was just really anxious to play king and emasculate her 3 year old son. Could she try any harder? Sounds like a whack job mom to me. She now believes it was in the boy’s dna. What does that have to do with scientific proof. This piece in nearer to pure propaganda.

[NotCranky]

[quote=Shadowfax]Rus, no it’s really not about a developmental moment.
They are not far from finding genetic links to being gay or straight.

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=4529843

I do have a sibling who is lesbian and she tried to date guys but nothing ever clicked for her until she kissed a girl. (God, I hate that Katy Perry song.) It seems that for so many it really is a question of you are or you aren’t.[/quote]
C’mon Shadowfax, That ABC article is terrible to use as proof of near scientific proof of a genetic link.

A couple of parents of gay kids give weak excuses to believe it was in the kid’s dna? Then a few contradictory Scientist comments equating ot a disclaimer for the whole theory?

Here is one woman in the article who believes in the DNA link, talking about her 3 year old son:

“We would play king and queen and of course, I was the king and he was the queen, you know,” said his mom, laughing. Maybe the mom was just really anxious to play king and emasculate her 3 year old son. Could she try any harder? Sounds like a whack job mom to me. She now believes it was in the boy’s dna. What does that have to do with scientific proof. This piece in nearer to pure propaganda.

[NotCranky]

[quote=Shadowfax]Rus, no it’s really not about a developmental moment.
They are not far from finding genetic links to being gay or straight.

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=4529843

I do have a sibling who is lesbian and she tried to date guys but nothing ever clicked for her until she kissed a girl. (God, I hate that Katy Perry song.) It seems that for so many it really is a question of you are or you aren’t.[/quote]
C’mon Shadowfax, That ABC article is terrible to use as proof of near scientific proof of a genetic link.

A couple of parents of gay kids give weak excuses to believe it was in the kid’s dna? Then a few contradictory Scientist comments equating ot a disclaimer for the whole theory?

Here is one woman in the article who believes in the DNA link, talking about her 3 year old son:

“We would play king and queen and of course, I was the king and he was the queen, you know,” said his mom, laughing. Maybe the mom was just really anxious to play king and emasculate her 3 year old son. Could she try any harder? Sounds like a whack job mom to me. She now believes it was in the boy’s dna. What does that have to do with scientific proof. This piece in nearer to pure propaganda.

[NotCranky]

[quote=Shadowfax]Rus, no it’s really not about a developmental moment.
They are not far from finding genetic links to being gay or straight.

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=4529843

I do have a sibling who is lesbian and she tried to date guys but nothing ever clicked for her until she kissed a girl. (God, I hate that Katy Perry song.) It seems that for so many it really is a question of you are or you aren’t.[/quote]
C’mon Shadowfax, That ABC article is terrible to use as proof of near scientific proof of a genetic link.

A couple of parents of gay kids give weak excuses to believe it was in the kid’s dna? Then a few contradictory Scientist comments equating ot a disclaimer for the whole theory?

Here is one woman in the article who believes in the DNA link, talking about her 3 year old son:

“We would play king and queen and of course, I was the king and he was the queen, you know,” said his mom, laughing. Maybe the mom was just really anxious to play king and emasculate her 3 year old son. Could she try any harder? Sounds like a whack job mom to me. She now believes it was in the boy’s dna. What does that have to do with scientific proof. This piece in nearer to pure propaganda.

[NotCranky]

[quote=gandalf]
Russ, to back up your theory about behavioral modification and sexual orientation, I have converted several lesbians back over to the straight side. That’s how the wizard with a big staff rolls, baby.[/quote]
I have reason to believe you.

[NotCranky]

[quote=gandalf]
Russ, to back up your theory about behavioral modification and sexual orientation, I have converted several lesbians back over to the straight side. That’s how the wizard with a big staff rolls, baby.[/quote]
I have reason to believe you.

[NotCranky]

[quote=gandalf]
Russ, to back up your theory about behavioral modification and sexual orientation, I have converted several lesbians back over to the straight side. That’s how the wizard with a big staff rolls, baby.[/quote]
I have reason to believe you.

[NotCranky]

[quote=gandalf]
Russ, to back up your theory about behavioral modification and sexual orientation, I have converted several lesbians back over to the straight side. That’s how the wizard with a big staff rolls, baby.[/quote]
I have reason to believe you.

[NotCranky]

[quote=gandalf]
Russ, to back up your theory about behavioral modification and sexual orientation, I have converted several lesbians back over to the straight side. That’s how the wizard with a big staff rolls, baby.[/quote]
I have reason to believe you.

[Shadowfax]

I am not responsible for the journalistic quality of the article. I went for the quick, approachable source, but I see you are going to need some serious convincing. Here is a more scholarly source:

http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html

It’s not proven at this point, but there is strong evidence that most of one’s sexual preference is genetic.

[Shadowfax]

I am not responsible for the journalistic quality of the article. I went for the quick, approachable source, but I see you are going to need some serious convincing. Here is a more scholarly source:

http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html

It’s not proven at this point, but there is strong evidence that most of one’s sexual preference is genetic.

[Shadowfax]

I am not responsible for the journalistic quality of the article. I went for the quick, approachable source, but I see you are going to need some serious convincing. Here is a more scholarly source:

http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html

It’s not proven at this point, but there is strong evidence that most of one’s sexual preference is genetic.

[Shadowfax]

I am not responsible for the journalistic quality of the article. I went for the quick, approachable source, but I see you are going to need some serious convincing. Here is a more scholarly source:

http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html

It’s not proven at this point, but there is strong evidence that most of one’s sexual preference is genetic.

[Author]

Posts