OT: Gay History in California Public Schools

[scaredyclassic]

what percentage of the population do you think could be happy with pure onanism? I wonder if it’s higher than generally recognized. I bet it’s at least 10%, but people are pressured socially to interact with each other. we could have less social problems if people didn’t interact with other humans

also, plushies should be encouraged.

and we should be giving tax credits for sex robots.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]what percentage of the population do you think could be happy with pure onanism? I wonder if it’s higher than generally recognized. I bet it’s at least 10%, but people are pressured socially to interact with each other. we could have less social problems if people didn’t interact with other humans

also, plushies should be encouraged.

and we should be giving tax credits for sex robots.[/quote]

@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.

@ Walterwhite/scaredycat/publicdefender/snapdoodlepoopsmearstupidhandleoftheminute

The cheaper government option would of course not be robots. It would be plush solutions and some sort of lubricant.

Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]what percentage of the population do you think could be happy with pure onanism? I wonder if it’s higher than generally recognized. I bet it’s at least 10%, but people are pressured socially to interact with each other. we could have less social problems if people didn’t interact with other humans

also, plushies should be encouraged.

and we should be giving tax credits for sex robots.[/quote]

@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.

@ Walterwhite/scaredycat/publicdefender/snapdoodlepoopsmearstupidhandleoftheminute

The cheaper government option would of course not be robots. It would be plush solutions and some sort of lubricant.

Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]what percentage of the population do you think could be happy with pure onanism? I wonder if it’s higher than generally recognized. I bet it’s at least 10%, but people are pressured socially to interact with each other. we could have less social problems if people didn’t interact with other humans

also, plushies should be encouraged.

and we should be giving tax credits for sex robots.[/quote]

@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.

@ Walterwhite/scaredycat/publicdefender/snapdoodlepoopsmearstupidhandleoftheminute

The cheaper government option would of course not be robots. It would be plush solutions and some sort of lubricant.

Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]what percentage of the population do you think could be happy with pure onanism? I wonder if it’s higher than generally recognized. I bet it’s at least 10%, but people are pressured socially to interact with each other. we could have less social problems if people didn’t interact with other humans

also, plushies should be encouraged.

and we should be giving tax credits for sex robots.[/quote]

@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.

@ Walterwhite/scaredycat/publicdefender/snapdoodlepoopsmearstupidhandleoftheminute

The cheaper government option would of course not be robots. It would be plush solutions and some sort of lubricant.

Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=walterwhite]what percentage of the population do you think could be happy with pure onanism? I wonder if it’s higher than generally recognized. I bet it’s at least 10%, but people are pressured socially to interact with each other. we could have less social problems if people didn’t interact with other humans

also, plushies should be encouraged.

and we should be giving tax credits for sex robots.[/quote]

@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.

@ Walterwhite/scaredycat/publicdefender/snapdoodlepoopsmearstupidhandleoftheminute

The cheaper government option would of course not be robots. It would be plush solutions and some sort of lubricant.

Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.

[NotCranky]

Shadow fax, That was a much better article. At the least it makes a case for tolerance of all the opinions expressed on this thread. I am glad the AMA has improved on the language from our days in psych 101, however I don’t trust the current account as being very objective.

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. The current political environment fosters carelessness and cover-ups.Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

Summary:

Let’s all grow up.

[NotCranky]

Shadow fax, That was a much better article. At the least it makes a case for tolerance of all the opinions expressed on this thread. I am glad the AMA has improved on the language from our days in psych 101, however I don’t trust the current account as being very objective.

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. The current political environment fosters carelessness and cover-ups.Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

Summary:

Let’s all grow up.

[NotCranky]

Shadow fax, That was a much better article. At the least it makes a case for tolerance of all the opinions expressed on this thread. I am glad the AMA has improved on the language from our days in psych 101, however I don’t trust the current account as being very objective.

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. The current political environment fosters carelessness and cover-ups.Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

Summary:

Let’s all grow up.

[NotCranky]

Shadow fax, That was a much better article. At the least it makes a case for tolerance of all the opinions expressed on this thread. I am glad the AMA has improved on the language from our days in psych 101, however I don’t trust the current account as being very objective.

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. The current political environment fosters carelessness and cover-ups.Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

Summary:

Let’s all grow up.

[NotCranky]

Shadow fax, That was a much better article. At the least it makes a case for tolerance of all the opinions expressed on this thread. I am glad the AMA has improved on the language from our days in psych 101, however I don’t trust the current account as being very objective.

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. The current political environment fosters carelessness and cover-ups.Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

Summary:

Let’s all grow up.

[Arraya]

[quote=Rustico]

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. [/quote]

Agreed. Early childhood really sets the stage for a lot of things.

[quote=Rustico]
Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

[/quote]

Agreed, sort of, if you are talking about the “it’s in the genes” argument. However, prenatal stresses can cause a host of behavioral dysfunctions in children and could also be labeled child abuse. Abused or severely stressed pregnant women will release excessive hormones that can set up genetic predispositions and alter biology/neurochemistry in a fetus.

As an aside, after living six years in Hillcrest I think I may have lost 25% of my straightness. So many pride parades takes a toll. j/k

[Arraya]

[quote=Rustico]

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. [/quote]

Agreed. Early childhood really sets the stage for a lot of things.

[quote=Rustico]
Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

[/quote]

Agreed, sort of, if you are talking about the “it’s in the genes” argument. However, prenatal stresses can cause a host of behavioral dysfunctions in children and could also be labeled child abuse. Abused or severely stressed pregnant women will release excessive hormones that can set up genetic predispositions and alter biology/neurochemistry in a fetus.

As an aside, after living six years in Hillcrest I think I may have lost 25% of my straightness. So many pride parades takes a toll. j/k

[Arraya]

[quote=Rustico]

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. [/quote]

Agreed. Early childhood really sets the stage for a lot of things.

[quote=Rustico]
Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

[/quote]

Agreed, sort of, if you are talking about the “it’s in the genes” argument. However, prenatal stresses can cause a host of behavioral dysfunctions in children and could also be labeled child abuse. Abused or severely stressed pregnant women will release excessive hormones that can set up genetic predispositions and alter biology/neurochemistry in a fetus.

As an aside, after living six years in Hillcrest I think I may have lost 25% of my straightness. So many pride parades takes a toll. j/k

[Arraya]

[quote=Rustico]

I also agree with the spectrum theory and have for decades. However I think we should be more open to how the positioning on the spectrum is reflected by problems, including carelessness or subtle and blatant abuse in the child’s early years. [/quote]

Agreed. Early childhood really sets the stage for a lot of things.

[quote=Rustico]
Over zealousness to giving premature and excessive credit to pre-birth conditions is a serious issue to children’s rights.

[/quote]

Agreed, sort of, if you are talking about the “it’s in the genes” argument. However, prenatal stresses can cause a host of behavioral dysfunctions in children and could also be labeled child abuse. Abused or severely stressed pregnant women will release excessive hormones that can set up genetic predispositions and alter biology/neurochemistry in a fetus.

As an aside, after living six years in Hillcrest I think I may have lost 25% of my straightness. So many pride parades takes a toll. j/k

[Author]

Posts