OT: Gay History in California Public Schools

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=paramount]Being gay should not define a special class of citizens or special status; and gays should not be recognized in a public school curriculum in the way that is being proposed.

Being gay is a behavior, not a social class.[/quote]

Social class is defined by any designator (eg: hair color, skin color, sexual behavior, income, alcohol consumption) that can be used to draw a circle around a group.

People who have same-sex relations may or may not be gay (eg: prison) but the point is that behavior is a perfectly acceptable designator of social class.

That is why we have a word for it.
That is why it is a designated “protected social class” in the state code.

By your definition, religion would also be likewise non-recognized.

Being a Mormon is also a behavior.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.
[/quote]
For any who read this above (yes both of you), please know:
I don’t actually know CAR’s gender nor do I have knowledge of any of her(his?) private info.
I do not have any info about any gender enhancement nor do I actually see her as a tool.
I was just saying that I agree with her and that I like the turn her discourse has taken for the insightful and I was saying it in a douchebag-like manner (shocking I know).
I do not know if she is female, black, or klingon (or all three) and don’t actually care.
The only point was that she made some good points and that I liked them.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.
[/quote]
For any who read this above (yes both of you), please know:
I don’t actually know CAR’s gender nor do I have knowledge of any of her(his?) private info.
I do not have any info about any gender enhancement nor do I actually see her as a tool.
I was just saying that I agree with her and that I like the turn her discourse has taken for the insightful and I was saying it in a douchebag-like manner (shocking I know).
I do not know if she is female, black, or klingon (or all three) and don’t actually care.
The only point was that she made some good points and that I liked them.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.
[/quote]
For any who read this above (yes both of you), please know:
I don’t actually know CAR’s gender nor do I have knowledge of any of her(his?) private info.
I do not have any info about any gender enhancement nor do I actually see her as a tool.
I was just saying that I agree with her and that I like the turn her discourse has taken for the insightful and I was saying it in a douchebag-like manner (shocking I know).
I do not know if she is female, black, or klingon (or all three) and don’t actually care.
The only point was that she made some good points and that I liked them.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.
[/quote]
For any who read this above (yes both of you), please know:
I don’t actually know CAR’s gender nor do I have knowledge of any of her(his?) private info.
I do not have any info about any gender enhancement nor do I actually see her as a tool.
I was just saying that I agree with her and that I like the turn her discourse has taken for the insightful and I was saying it in a douchebag-like manner (shocking I know).
I do not know if she is female, black, or klingon (or all three) and don’t actually care.
The only point was that she made some good points and that I liked them.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
@ CAR:
You are a tool and I therefore would request that you stop making posts that I agree with.
It horrifies me.
Please dude.
Also, I know you are female but my reference to dude was a reference to your original gender.
Unfortunately I agree with much of what you have written here.
[/quote]
For any who read this above (yes both of you), please know:
I don’t actually know CAR’s gender nor do I have knowledge of any of her(his?) private info.
I do not have any info about any gender enhancement nor do I actually see her as a tool.
I was just saying that I agree with her and that I like the turn her discourse has taken for the insightful and I was saying it in a douchebag-like manner (shocking I know).
I do not know if she is female, black, or klingon (or all three) and don’t actually care.
The only point was that she made some good points and that I liked them.

[UCGal]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)

[UCGal]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)

[UCGal]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)

[UCGal]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)

[UCGal]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=UCGal][quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)[/quote]

Is it that frothy mix of real estate and illogically optimistic hype that is sometimes the by-product of financial suicide?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=UCGal][quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)[/quote]

Is it that frothy mix of real estate and illogically optimistic hype that is sometimes the by-product of financial suicide?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=UCGal][quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)[/quote]

Is it that frothy mix of real estate and illogically optimistic hype that is sometimes the by-product of financial suicide?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=UCGal][quote=urbanrealtor]
Yiffing as public policy (I needed Wikipedia for that word).

Summary:

Discussion of educational policy to debate over tax dollars for sex with robots and stuffed animals in just 118 comments.

Score!!!!!

I have now won the internets.[/quote]
I can’t give you props till you use the word “Santorum” in it’s proper context for this discussion.

(For those not in the know – a quick google will explain.)[/quote]

Is it that frothy mix of real estate and illogically optimistic hype that is sometimes the by-product of financial suicide?

[Author]

Posts