Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › One Paseo Vote
- This topic has 266 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 24, 2015 at 9:28 AM #783289February 24, 2015 at 9:39 AM #783290
The-Shoveler
ParticipantYou would know better than I flu.
Like I said my main objection is that it just seems TPTB in SD will just do what they want regardless of the local’s opinions/objections.
They have a plan by golly and they are going to implement it. So who is next LOL.
February 24, 2015 at 10:06 AM #783291an
ParticipantI’m glad it passed with ease. Within city of San Diego, Civita is under construction, One Paseo will start by end of the year, and Stone Creek hopefully getting approved/start construction in 2-3, I think San Diego is definitely moving in the right direction. Hopefully they’ll update the trolley plan to add a stop at One Paseo as well, now that we know it’ll be built with high density and a lot of office space.
February 24, 2015 at 10:11 AM #783292CoronitaParticipant[quote=The-Shoveler]You would know better than I flu.
Like I said my main objection is that it just seems TPTB in SD will just do what they want regardless of the local’s opinions/objections.
They have a plan by golly and they are going to implement it. So who is next LOL.[/quote]
Yeah, I know….What can you do.
February 24, 2015 at 10:22 AM #783293FlyerInHi
Guest[quote=AN]I’m glad it passed with ease. Within city of San Diego, Civita is under construction, One Paseo will start by end of the year, and Stone Creek hopefully getting approved/start construction in 2-3, I think San Diego is definitely moving in the right direction. Hopefully they’ll update the trolley plan to add a stop at One Paseo as well, now that we know it’ll be built with high density and a lot of office space.[/quote]
Absolutely. 7 to 2 vote was not even close.
Sherri Litner could not vote otherwise and keep her job, but I’m sure she would have voted yes for a similar project not in her district.This will be a catalytic converter for things to come in San Diego. If they really want organic growth they should let mom and pop builders densify the city one lot at a time.
February 24, 2015 at 10:28 AM #783294Guest[quote=The-Shoveler]You would know better than I flu.
Like I said my main objection is that it just seems TPTB in SD will just do what they want regardless of the local’s opinions/objections.
They have a plan by golly and they are going to implement it. So who is next LOL.[/quote]
The city council as a whole voted and you’re not happy?
The city council voted to protect barrio logan; and through a proposition, the voters sided with a big employer, nassco. So no, people living in the community don’t always get what they want.
Maybe One Paseo opponents could get a proposition on a city wide ballot?
February 24, 2015 at 10:33 AM #783295ParticipantIt’s the next one I am worried about.
PIIOPBYThe Heck with what the local’s think.
February 24, 2015 at 10:36 AM #783296GuestThe next one will be bigger. It’s about time for San Diego to think big/world class.
February 24, 2015 at 10:37 AM #783297Participant[quote=FlyerInHi]This will be a catalytic converter for things to come in San Diego. If they really want organic growth they should let mom and pop builders densify the city one lot at a time.[/quote]I think this is where I’d draw the line. I’m all for converting strip malls into dense town centers and replacing 1-2 stories office buildings with high rises in designated job centers. But I don’t know if I want every house to have to ability to be rezoned. Last thing I want is mini dorms to pop up in areas around universities.
February 24, 2015 at 10:40 AM #783298Participant[quote=FlyerInHi]The next one will be bigger. It’s about time for San Diego to think big/world class.[/quote]The next one is bigger. Here’s the next one: http://miramesatowncouncil.org/doc/Plangrp/Stone%20Creek/Stone%20Creek%20Summary%202015.pdf It should start in 2-3 years if it gets approved soon.
February 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM #783299GuestMini dorms are “illegals” but they are a fact of life because people double/triple/quadruple up. That will continue as affordability decreases.
I’m talking about being able to submit a “legal” project and get it approved more easily. We should get more ad-hoc development rather than sticking to decades old master plans that are irrelevant to the way we live today.
Problem now is that it takes a lot of resources to get a variance, which means that cost of doing business is very high.
February 24, 2015 at 12:54 PM #783300spdrun
Participant^^^ Exactly. Density should actually reduce the need for mini-dorms. Though, personally, as long as one person to a bedroom is observed, I fail to see what difference a “mini-dorm” makes. Unless you’re an old who thinks that music after 9 pm is a mortal sin worthy of a police choke-hold.
If I didn’t live in a major city and I wanted to stay in the US, a college town would be a close second as far as the environment I wanted.
February 24, 2015 at 12:55 PM #783301GuestOnly 1 person to a bedroom? 2 to a bedroom as a lower limit is more like it. What about people have menage a trois?
Can’t 3 kids share one bedroom?
kidding aside, you should know that in NYC so many apartments don’t have living or dining rooms because they’ve been converted to “illegal” bedrooms.
Personally, I see more multigenerational extended families. People should be able to legally modify SFRs to add in-law apartments with kitchens
February 24, 2015 at 1:06 PM #783302Participant3 people to a bedroom is uncommon even in NY — I don’t think it would be very common in San Diego.
February 24, 2015 at 1:11 PM #783303flyer
ParticipantWith so little “buildable” land left, I think projects like this will be self-limiting going forward.
Affordability is another issue, and I expect San Diego will become less and less affordable for more and more people as time goes on.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.