Home › Forums › Other › Off Topic “When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”
- This topic has 370 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 26, 2008 at 12:38 PM #293567October 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM #293217KilohanaParticipant
[quote=Veritas]Asking tough questions leads to censorship:
“Barack Obama’s campaign killed all interviews with a Florida TV station after Sen. Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, faced tough and critical questions from a reporter at the Orlando station, the Orlando Sentinel reported.”
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/25/obama-campaign-cuts-interviews-florida-tv-station/
First comes the censorship, then the blackouts, next the blacklist and the book burning. Change~[/quote]
I agree. In fact, I agreed when McCain threw Maureen Dowd (CNN) off his campaign plane.
But then I was reassured that this was not censorship because McCain was only standing up to bully reporters.
I’m so glad we will have Palin in office to discourage book burning!
Weee!
October 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM #293543KilohanaParticipant[quote=Veritas]Asking tough questions leads to censorship:
“Barack Obama’s campaign killed all interviews with a Florida TV station after Sen. Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, faced tough and critical questions from a reporter at the Orlando station, the Orlando Sentinel reported.”
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/25/obama-campaign-cuts-interviews-florida-tv-station/
First comes the censorship, then the blackouts, next the blacklist and the book burning. Change~[/quote]
I agree. In fact, I agreed when McCain threw Maureen Dowd (CNN) off his campaign plane.
But then I was reassured that this was not censorship because McCain was only standing up to bully reporters.
I’m so glad we will have Palin in office to discourage book burning!
Weee!
October 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM #293569KilohanaParticipant[quote=Veritas]Asking tough questions leads to censorship:
“Barack Obama’s campaign killed all interviews with a Florida TV station after Sen. Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, faced tough and critical questions from a reporter at the Orlando station, the Orlando Sentinel reported.”
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/25/obama-campaign-cuts-interviews-florida-tv-station/
First comes the censorship, then the blackouts, next the blacklist and the book burning. Change~[/quote]
I agree. In fact, I agreed when McCain threw Maureen Dowd (CNN) off his campaign plane.
But then I was reassured that this was not censorship because McCain was only standing up to bully reporters.
I’m so glad we will have Palin in office to discourage book burning!
Weee!
October 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM #293581KilohanaParticipant[quote=Veritas]Asking tough questions leads to censorship:
“Barack Obama’s campaign killed all interviews with a Florida TV station after Sen. Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, faced tough and critical questions from a reporter at the Orlando station, the Orlando Sentinel reported.”
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/25/obama-campaign-cuts-interviews-florida-tv-station/
First comes the censorship, then the blackouts, next the blacklist and the book burning. Change~[/quote]
I agree. In fact, I agreed when McCain threw Maureen Dowd (CNN) off his campaign plane.
But then I was reassured that this was not censorship because McCain was only standing up to bully reporters.
I’m so glad we will have Palin in office to discourage book burning!
Weee!
October 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM #293617KilohanaParticipant[quote=Veritas]Asking tough questions leads to censorship:
“Barack Obama’s campaign killed all interviews with a Florida TV station after Sen. Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, faced tough and critical questions from a reporter at the Orlando station, the Orlando Sentinel reported.”
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/25/obama-campaign-cuts-interviews-florida-tv-station/
First comes the censorship, then the blackouts, next the blacklist and the book burning. Change~[/quote]
I agree. In fact, I agreed when McCain threw Maureen Dowd (CNN) off his campaign plane.
But then I was reassured that this was not censorship because McCain was only standing up to bully reporters.
I’m so glad we will have Palin in office to discourage book burning!
Weee!
October 26, 2008 at 1:59 PM #293222tcParticipantKeep squirming around. I quite enjoy it. It reminds me how desperate you are.
October 26, 2008 at 1:59 PM #293548tcParticipantKeep squirming around. I quite enjoy it. It reminds me how desperate you are.
October 26, 2008 at 1:59 PM #293574tcParticipantKeep squirming around. I quite enjoy it. It reminds me how desperate you are.
October 26, 2008 at 1:59 PM #293586tcParticipantKeep squirming around. I quite enjoy it. It reminds me how desperate you are.
October 26, 2008 at 1:59 PM #293622tcParticipantKeep squirming around. I quite enjoy it. It reminds me how desperate you are.
October 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM #293247ArrayaParticipantLots of conspiracy theories are bogus, but rejecting them all just because of how they’re framed is not wise. The way it is today, a gang of conspirators could get away with anything: they just need to start an Internet rumor of what they just did, framing it as a conspiracy theory, and anyone who tries to talk about it will be ignored.
While it would be difficult to prove, this story fits the modus operandi of propagandists, who are masters at spreading false claims of scandals and then discrediting those spreading false claims once they get some traction among dissidents.
Or
Like, in 2004, CBS anchorman Dan Rather was baited with doctored memos of Bush going AWOL in the National Guard – the scandal was real but the memos were not, so Rather became the issue, not W.
I personally could care less if he is not eligible, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit. Not in a “he is a manchurian candidate from the muslim world” way more “All mainstream candidates are preselected by the real powers in charge” way and if he is their man they could make him a citizen. The ironic thing is the vitriol in which people argue over which of the two corporate stooge candidates would do a better job than the other, when the differences between the two is paper thing besides packaging. You people are fooling yourselves.
October 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM #293573ArrayaParticipantLots of conspiracy theories are bogus, but rejecting them all just because of how they’re framed is not wise. The way it is today, a gang of conspirators could get away with anything: they just need to start an Internet rumor of what they just did, framing it as a conspiracy theory, and anyone who tries to talk about it will be ignored.
While it would be difficult to prove, this story fits the modus operandi of propagandists, who are masters at spreading false claims of scandals and then discrediting those spreading false claims once they get some traction among dissidents.
Or
Like, in 2004, CBS anchorman Dan Rather was baited with doctored memos of Bush going AWOL in the National Guard – the scandal was real but the memos were not, so Rather became the issue, not W.
I personally could care less if he is not eligible, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit. Not in a “he is a manchurian candidate from the muslim world” way more “All mainstream candidates are preselected by the real powers in charge” way and if he is their man they could make him a citizen. The ironic thing is the vitriol in which people argue over which of the two corporate stooge candidates would do a better job than the other, when the differences between the two is paper thing besides packaging. You people are fooling yourselves.
October 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM #293600ArrayaParticipantLots of conspiracy theories are bogus, but rejecting them all just because of how they’re framed is not wise. The way it is today, a gang of conspirators could get away with anything: they just need to start an Internet rumor of what they just did, framing it as a conspiracy theory, and anyone who tries to talk about it will be ignored.
While it would be difficult to prove, this story fits the modus operandi of propagandists, who are masters at spreading false claims of scandals and then discrediting those spreading false claims once they get some traction among dissidents.
Or
Like, in 2004, CBS anchorman Dan Rather was baited with doctored memos of Bush going AWOL in the National Guard – the scandal was real but the memos were not, so Rather became the issue, not W.
I personally could care less if he is not eligible, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit. Not in a “he is a manchurian candidate from the muslim world” way more “All mainstream candidates are preselected by the real powers in charge” way and if he is their man they could make him a citizen. The ironic thing is the vitriol in which people argue over which of the two corporate stooge candidates would do a better job than the other, when the differences between the two is paper thing besides packaging. You people are fooling yourselves.
October 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM #293611ArrayaParticipantLots of conspiracy theories are bogus, but rejecting them all just because of how they’re framed is not wise. The way it is today, a gang of conspirators could get away with anything: they just need to start an Internet rumor of what they just did, framing it as a conspiracy theory, and anyone who tries to talk about it will be ignored.
While it would be difficult to prove, this story fits the modus operandi of propagandists, who are masters at spreading false claims of scandals and then discrediting those spreading false claims once they get some traction among dissidents.
Or
Like, in 2004, CBS anchorman Dan Rather was baited with doctored memos of Bush going AWOL in the National Guard – the scandal was real but the memos were not, so Rather became the issue, not W.
I personally could care less if he is not eligible, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit. Not in a “he is a manchurian candidate from the muslim world” way more “All mainstream candidates are preselected by the real powers in charge” way and if he is their man they could make him a citizen. The ironic thing is the vitriol in which people argue over which of the two corporate stooge candidates would do a better job than the other, when the differences between the two is paper thing besides packaging. You people are fooling yourselves.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.