Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Mad as Hell and not going to take it anymore ???
- This topic has 340 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 19, 2010 at 2:05 PM #516110February 19, 2010 at 2:10 PM #515219Allan from FallbrookParticipant
Uh, Fergus? Take a deep breath, there, Bubba. Done fulminating against the “black helicopter” crowd, are you?
The guns were discussed in the context of defending ourselves against internal/external threats (be it terrorists or otherwise), rather than having the government do it for us. NONE of us were discussing using our little guns to defend AGAINST the government. See the difference? Yeah.
More to the point, the gun discussion was largely a threadjack talking about various guns and why we like ’em so much. You don’t really have that Montana Militia/Stormfront crowd participating on this site, so your shots are misplaced.
You might check out http://www.IHateUncleSugar.com or something like that. Plenty of fearful, under-educated pickup drivers to rant at there, I’d imagine.
February 19, 2010 at 2:10 PM #515362Allan from FallbrookParticipantUh, Fergus? Take a deep breath, there, Bubba. Done fulminating against the “black helicopter” crowd, are you?
The guns were discussed in the context of defending ourselves against internal/external threats (be it terrorists or otherwise), rather than having the government do it for us. NONE of us were discussing using our little guns to defend AGAINST the government. See the difference? Yeah.
More to the point, the gun discussion was largely a threadjack talking about various guns and why we like ’em so much. You don’t really have that Montana Militia/Stormfront crowd participating on this site, so your shots are misplaced.
You might check out http://www.IHateUncleSugar.com or something like that. Plenty of fearful, under-educated pickup drivers to rant at there, I’d imagine.
February 19, 2010 at 2:10 PM #515781Allan from FallbrookParticipantUh, Fergus? Take a deep breath, there, Bubba. Done fulminating against the “black helicopter” crowd, are you?
The guns were discussed in the context of defending ourselves against internal/external threats (be it terrorists or otherwise), rather than having the government do it for us. NONE of us were discussing using our little guns to defend AGAINST the government. See the difference? Yeah.
More to the point, the gun discussion was largely a threadjack talking about various guns and why we like ’em so much. You don’t really have that Montana Militia/Stormfront crowd participating on this site, so your shots are misplaced.
You might check out http://www.IHateUncleSugar.com or something like that. Plenty of fearful, under-educated pickup drivers to rant at there, I’d imagine.
February 19, 2010 at 2:10 PM #515871Allan from FallbrookParticipantUh, Fergus? Take a deep breath, there, Bubba. Done fulminating against the “black helicopter” crowd, are you?
The guns were discussed in the context of defending ourselves against internal/external threats (be it terrorists or otherwise), rather than having the government do it for us. NONE of us were discussing using our little guns to defend AGAINST the government. See the difference? Yeah.
More to the point, the gun discussion was largely a threadjack talking about various guns and why we like ’em so much. You don’t really have that Montana Militia/Stormfront crowd participating on this site, so your shots are misplaced.
You might check out http://www.IHateUncleSugar.com or something like that. Plenty of fearful, under-educated pickup drivers to rant at there, I’d imagine.
February 19, 2010 at 2:10 PM #516120Allan from FallbrookParticipantUh, Fergus? Take a deep breath, there, Bubba. Done fulminating against the “black helicopter” crowd, are you?
The guns were discussed in the context of defending ourselves against internal/external threats (be it terrorists or otherwise), rather than having the government do it for us. NONE of us were discussing using our little guns to defend AGAINST the government. See the difference? Yeah.
More to the point, the gun discussion was largely a threadjack talking about various guns and why we like ’em so much. You don’t really have that Montana Militia/Stormfront crowd participating on this site, so your shots are misplaced.
You might check out http://www.IHateUncleSugar.com or something like that. Plenty of fearful, under-educated pickup drivers to rant at there, I’d imagine.
February 19, 2010 at 2:24 PM #515229daveljParticipant[quote=CONCHO]So, this was all a conspiracy? Who, exactly, do you think was behind it exactly? And for what gain?
I am merely pointing out what the eyewitness said.[/quote]
Indeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
February 19, 2010 at 2:24 PM #515372daveljParticipant[quote=CONCHO]So, this was all a conspiracy? Who, exactly, do you think was behind it exactly? And for what gain?
I am merely pointing out what the eyewitness said.[/quote]
Indeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
February 19, 2010 at 2:24 PM #515791daveljParticipant[quote=CONCHO]So, this was all a conspiracy? Who, exactly, do you think was behind it exactly? And for what gain?
I am merely pointing out what the eyewitness said.[/quote]
Indeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
February 19, 2010 at 2:24 PM #515881daveljParticipant[quote=CONCHO]So, this was all a conspiracy? Who, exactly, do you think was behind it exactly? And for what gain?
I am merely pointing out what the eyewitness said.[/quote]
Indeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
February 19, 2010 at 2:24 PM #516130daveljParticipant[quote=CONCHO]So, this was all a conspiracy? Who, exactly, do you think was behind it exactly? And for what gain?
I am merely pointing out what the eyewitness said.[/quote]
Indeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
February 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM #515239blahblahblahParticipantIndeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
Dude, give it up. An eyewitness went on TV, gave her full name and told you that a firetruck and hazmat team were there when the plane crashed. Either she is a liar, she’s crazy, or she’s telling the truth. If she’s telling the truth, it is an amazing coincidence. I’m not inferring anything at all other than that is an amazing coincidence, but you seem to be. So if you don’t want to believe that this is an amazing coincidence, just tell yourself that she is a liar or crazy and move on. As for myself I have no idea. Maybe she is a liar. Maybe she is crazy.
February 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM #515382blahblahblahParticipantIndeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
Dude, give it up. An eyewitness went on TV, gave her full name and told you that a firetruck and hazmat team were there when the plane crashed. Either she is a liar, she’s crazy, or she’s telling the truth. If she’s telling the truth, it is an amazing coincidence. I’m not inferring anything at all other than that is an amazing coincidence, but you seem to be. So if you don’t want to believe that this is an amazing coincidence, just tell yourself that she is a liar or crazy and move on. As for myself I have no idea. Maybe she is a liar. Maybe she is crazy.
February 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM #515801blahblahblahParticipantIndeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
Dude, give it up. An eyewitness went on TV, gave her full name and told you that a firetruck and hazmat team were there when the plane crashed. Either she is a liar, she’s crazy, or she’s telling the truth. If she’s telling the truth, it is an amazing coincidence. I’m not inferring anything at all other than that is an amazing coincidence, but you seem to be. So if you don’t want to believe that this is an amazing coincidence, just tell yourself that she is a liar or crazy and move on. As for myself I have no idea. Maybe she is a liar. Maybe she is crazy.
February 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM #515891blahblahblahParticipantIndeed, but by pointing it out you are clearly inferring something… yes? And that inference is what, exactly?
Dude, give it up. An eyewitness went on TV, gave her full name and told you that a firetruck and hazmat team were there when the plane crashed. Either she is a liar, she’s crazy, or she’s telling the truth. If she’s telling the truth, it is an amazing coincidence. I’m not inferring anything at all other than that is an amazing coincidence, but you seem to be. So if you don’t want to believe that this is an amazing coincidence, just tell yourself that she is a liar or crazy and move on. As for myself I have no idea. Maybe she is a liar. Maybe she is crazy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.