Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Mad as Hell and not going to take it anymore ???
- This topic has 340 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2010 at 12:39 PM #516584February 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM #515677Allan from FallbrookParticipant
[quote=Russell][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Russ: Bellicose? Me? Nah.
Carthago Delenda Est.[/quote]
Credo quia absurdumAmicus Plato,sed magi amica veritas.[/quote]
Russ: We’re going in two different directions on this, Rustico. I wasn’t discussing the truth, rather, I was making an oblique reference to the Cold War MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) theory.
I do, however, support your love of the truth. And your stubborn stance on (un)reasonableness.
February 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM #515821Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Russ: Bellicose? Me? Nah.
Carthago Delenda Est.[/quote]
Credo quia absurdumAmicus Plato,sed magi amica veritas.[/quote]
Russ: We’re going in two different directions on this, Rustico. I wasn’t discussing the truth, rather, I was making an oblique reference to the Cold War MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) theory.
I do, however, support your love of the truth. And your stubborn stance on (un)reasonableness.
February 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM #516245Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Russ: Bellicose? Me? Nah.
Carthago Delenda Est.[/quote]
Credo quia absurdumAmicus Plato,sed magi amica veritas.[/quote]
Russ: We’re going in two different directions on this, Rustico. I wasn’t discussing the truth, rather, I was making an oblique reference to the Cold War MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) theory.
I do, however, support your love of the truth. And your stubborn stance on (un)reasonableness.
February 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM #516336Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Russ: Bellicose? Me? Nah.
Carthago Delenda Est.[/quote]
Credo quia absurdumAmicus Plato,sed magi amica veritas.[/quote]
Russ: We’re going in two different directions on this, Rustico. I wasn’t discussing the truth, rather, I was making an oblique reference to the Cold War MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) theory.
I do, however, support your love of the truth. And your stubborn stance on (un)reasonableness.
February 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM #516589Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Russ: Bellicose? Me? Nah.
Carthago Delenda Est.[/quote]
Credo quia absurdumAmicus Plato,sed magi amica veritas.[/quote]
Russ: We’re going in two different directions on this, Rustico. I wasn’t discussing the truth, rather, I was making an oblique reference to the Cold War MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) theory.
I do, however, support your love of the truth. And your stubborn stance on (un)reasonableness.
February 20, 2010 at 2:26 PM #515712NotCrankyParticipantTwo different directions at the same time by intention. I did think you meant to infer something else though, not about truth but about style. It must have been, or could have been fun to study Latin,especially with a great teacher.
February 20, 2010 at 2:26 PM #515856NotCrankyParticipantTwo different directions at the same time by intention. I did think you meant to infer something else though, not about truth but about style. It must have been, or could have been fun to study Latin,especially with a great teacher.
February 20, 2010 at 2:26 PM #516280NotCrankyParticipantTwo different directions at the same time by intention. I did think you meant to infer something else though, not about truth but about style. It must have been, or could have been fun to study Latin,especially with a great teacher.
February 20, 2010 at 2:26 PM #516371NotCrankyParticipantTwo different directions at the same time by intention. I did think you meant to infer something else though, not about truth but about style. It must have been, or could have been fun to study Latin,especially with a great teacher.
February 20, 2010 at 2:26 PM #516624NotCrankyParticipantTwo different directions at the same time by intention. I did think you meant to infer something else though, not about truth but about style. It must have been, or could have been fun to study Latin,especially with a great teacher.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.