60 mpg by 2025

[Coronita]

[quote=sdduuuude]If I didn’t know any better, I would think I’m arguing with this guy:

http://piggington.com/user/briansd1%5B/quote%5D

I’d say it’s more likely

http://piggington.com/user/iforget

[afx114]

Sddood,

What are your thoughts on the mandatory seatbelt law?

[afx114]

Sddood,

What are your thoughts on the mandatory seatbelt law?

[afx114]

Sddood,

What are your thoughts on the mandatory seatbelt law?

[afx114]

Sddood,

What are your thoughts on the mandatory seatbelt law?

[afx114]

Sddood,

What are your thoughts on the mandatory seatbelt law?

[sdduuuude]

It’s your life, do with it what you will.

Still, I don’t have too much of an issues with it. In a free market, insurance would require seat belts and I have no issues w/ the gov. requiring insurance, so it ends up being the same thing.

[sdduuuude]

It’s your life, do with it what you will.

Still, I don’t have too much of an issues with it. In a free market, insurance would require seat belts and I have no issues w/ the gov. requiring insurance, so it ends up being the same thing.

[sdduuuude]

It’s your life, do with it what you will.

Still, I don’t have too much of an issues with it. In a free market, insurance would require seat belts and I have no issues w/ the gov. requiring insurance, so it ends up being the same thing.

[sdduuuude]

It’s your life, do with it what you will.

Still, I don’t have too much of an issues with it. In a free market, insurance would require seat belts and I have no issues w/ the gov. requiring insurance, so it ends up being the same thing.

[sdduuuude]

It’s your life, do with it what you will.

Still, I don’t have too much of an issues with it. In a free market, insurance would require seat belts and I have no issues w/ the gov. requiring insurance, so it ends up being the same thing.

[briansd1]

I personally would like the government to stop spending money on building new roads so that public transport becomes a more viable option.

BTW, mandating higher CAFE standards does not mean that gas guzzlers will be banned. Gas guzzlers will become more expensive, that’s all.

Mark my words; when the Chinese build new alternative fuel auto companies and when we have to buy their cars, we will wonder why we gave up that market. At that time, just don’t complain about the hollowing of the American middle-class.

[briansd1]

I personally would like the government to stop spending money on building new roads so that public transport becomes a more viable option.

BTW, mandating higher CAFE standards does not mean that gas guzzlers will be banned. Gas guzzlers will become more expensive, that’s all.

Mark my words; when the Chinese build new alternative fuel auto companies and when we have to buy their cars, we will wonder why we gave up that market. At that time, just don’t complain about the hollowing of the American middle-class.

[briansd1]

I personally would like the government to stop spending money on building new roads so that public transport becomes a more viable option.

BTW, mandating higher CAFE standards does not mean that gas guzzlers will be banned. Gas guzzlers will become more expensive, that’s all.

Mark my words; when the Chinese build new alternative fuel auto companies and when we have to buy their cars, we will wonder why we gave up that market. At that time, just don’t complain about the hollowing of the American middle-class.

[briansd1]

I personally would like the government to stop spending money on building new roads so that public transport becomes a more viable option.

BTW, mandating higher CAFE standards does not mean that gas guzzlers will be banned. Gas guzzlers will become more expensive, that’s all.

Mark my words; when the Chinese build new alternative fuel auto companies and when we have to buy their cars, we will wonder why we gave up that market. At that time, just don’t complain about the hollowing of the American middle-class.

[Author]

Posts