[scaredyclassic]

someone posted; People already have the choice of living as you describe. Isn’t it better to have the choice of living the lifestyle you prefer, rather than being forced to live a certain way?

no. because your choices affect me. Like, i would liek to have some air and water left. I would like not to have the globe heated up beyond liveability. The whole world cannot live in 3000 square foot air conditioned homes. so whys hould you? or me? what si the true cost of it all. the cost of a housing boom is more than just the economic cost. what about all that land destroyed. I was hiking in an area that was “wild” and then hal f of it got cleared and graded. it made me wanna cry. and you know what, those graded lots will probably just freaking sit there. sadness. what si the global cost of this ‘lifestyle we prefer”…im too drunk to contnue…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

if the free market is so great, why all this resistance to allowing it to operate. if dramatic rises to the upside are ok, why not dramatic decreases. why is one more shocking to the “system” than the other.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

if the free market is so great, why all this resistance to allowing it to operate. if dramatic rises to the upside are ok, why not dramatic decreases. why is one more shocking to the “system” than the other.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

if the free market is so great, why all this resistance to allowing it to operate. if dramatic rises to the upside are ok, why not dramatic decreases. why is one more shocking to the “system” than the other.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

if the free market is so great, why all this resistance to allowing it to operate. if dramatic rises to the upside are ok, why not dramatic decreases. why is one more shocking to the “system” than the other.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

if the free market is so great, why all this resistance to allowing it to operate. if dramatic rises to the upside are ok, why not dramatic decreases. why is one more shocking to the “system” than the other.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, no one really cares what i (or any of us want)…but that doesn’t stop me from thinking i know what i want. and you. I’m not particularly interested in less people. i’m more interested in less desire. For more house. more space. more of everything. falling house prices is good. might incentivize buidlers to build smaller houses. might encourage less consumption. if we earn less, and consume less, we might be better off. I suppose in a sense, “reproducing” is the ultimate consumption, in that we consume reosurces through others (that is, our offspring). course, we dont need an official govt policy for one kid. just have it make economic sense…too late for those of us who have a buncha kids. like me…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, no one really cares what i (or any of us want)…but that doesn’t stop me from thinking i know what i want. and you. I’m not particularly interested in less people. i’m more interested in less desire. For more house. more space. more of everything. falling house prices is good. might incentivize buidlers to build smaller houses. might encourage less consumption. if we earn less, and consume less, we might be better off. I suppose in a sense, “reproducing” is the ultimate consumption, in that we consume reosurces through others (that is, our offspring). course, we dont need an official govt policy for one kid. just have it make economic sense…too late for those of us who have a buncha kids. like me…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, no one really cares what i (or any of us want)…but that doesn’t stop me from thinking i know what i want. and you. I’m not particularly interested in less people. i’m more interested in less desire. For more house. more space. more of everything. falling house prices is good. might incentivize buidlers to build smaller houses. might encourage less consumption. if we earn less, and consume less, we might be better off. I suppose in a sense, “reproducing” is the ultimate consumption, in that we consume reosurces through others (that is, our offspring). course, we dont need an official govt policy for one kid. just have it make economic sense…too late for those of us who have a buncha kids. like me…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, no one really cares what i (or any of us want)…but that doesn’t stop me from thinking i know what i want. and you. I’m not particularly interested in less people. i’m more interested in less desire. For more house. more space. more of everything. falling house prices is good. might incentivize buidlers to build smaller houses. might encourage less consumption. if we earn less, and consume less, we might be better off. I suppose in a sense, “reproducing” is the ultimate consumption, in that we consume reosurces through others (that is, our offspring). course, we dont need an official govt policy for one kid. just have it make economic sense…too late for those of us who have a buncha kids. like me…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

well, no one really cares what i (or any of us want)…but that doesn’t stop me from thinking i know what i want. and you. I’m not particularly interested in less people. i’m more interested in less desire. For more house. more space. more of everything. falling house prices is good. might incentivize buidlers to build smaller houses. might encourage less consumption. if we earn less, and consume less, we might be better off. I suppose in a sense, “reproducing” is the ultimate consumption, in that we consume reosurces through others (that is, our offspring). course, we dont need an official govt policy for one kid. just have it make economic sense…too late for those of us who have a buncha kids. like me…

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

The more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

The more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

The more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.

Drink Heavily.

[scaredyclassic]

The more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.

Drink Heavily.

[Author]

Posts