[nocommonsense]

[quote=ocrenter]
The truth about the over 250k class is this: If their income over 250k is tax’d heavily, it would be their incentive to spend that > 250k income as much as possible in the form of business related deductions. If their over 250k income is not taxed as heavily, they just end up saving it or investing in financial holdings.[/quote]

Not trying to attack you–just using your comment to make a point. Whatever one does with his income (above $250K or not) is not the government’s damn business, and is no excuse to use to rob his money via unfair and excessive taxation.

It’s this same “thug” logic that the communist countries used to rob the “rich” to give to the “poor”.

[nocommonsense]

Original poster:

You’re thinking it the wrong way. In effect you’re giving the government the right to increase/keep taxation as any level it wishes in order to sustain its spending.

Instead, what’s wrong with looking at the revevue and planning the spending accordingly, just like any individule/family does? Clearly, and clearly government spending has been OUT OF CONTROL!

[nocommonsense]

Original poster:

You’re thinking it the wrong way. In effect you’re giving the government the right to increase/keep taxation as any level it wishes in order to sustain its spending.

Instead, what’s wrong with looking at the revevue and planning the spending accordingly, just like any individule/family does? Clearly, and clearly government spending has been OUT OF CONTROL!

[nocommonsense]

Original poster:

You’re thinking it the wrong way. In effect you’re giving the government the right to increase/keep taxation as any level it wishes in order to sustain its spending.

Instead, what’s wrong with looking at the revevue and planning the spending accordingly, just like any individule/family does? Clearly, and clearly government spending has been OUT OF CONTROL!

[nocommonsense]

Original poster:

You’re thinking it the wrong way. In effect you’re giving the government the right to increase/keep taxation as any level it wishes in order to sustain its spending.

Instead, what’s wrong with looking at the revevue and planning the spending accordingly, just like any individule/family does? Clearly, and clearly government spending has been OUT OF CONTROL!

[nocommonsense]

Original poster:

You’re thinking it the wrong way. In effect you’re giving the government the right to increase/keep taxation as any level it wishes in order to sustain its spending.

Instead, what’s wrong with looking at the revevue and planning the spending accordingly, just like any individule/family does? Clearly, and clearly government spending has been OUT OF CONTROL!

[nocommonsense]

I waited until yesterday to pay it. It’s sickening to pay that much money just to “own” a house. I applaud the ingenuity of the American politicians for coming up with this method of taxing the people, which I think is so wrong on so many grounds.

Interestingly, China is learning fast and is in the process of instituting this tax on property owners.

[nocommonsense]

I waited until yesterday to pay it. It’s sickening to pay that much money just to “own” a house. I applaud the ingenuity of the American politicians for coming up with this method of taxing the people, which I think is so wrong on so many grounds.

Interestingly, China is learning fast and is in the process of instituting this tax on property owners.

[nocommonsense]

I waited until yesterday to pay it. It’s sickening to pay that much money just to “own” a house. I applaud the ingenuity of the American politicians for coming up with this method of taxing the people, which I think is so wrong on so many grounds.

Interestingly, China is learning fast and is in the process of instituting this tax on property owners.

[nocommonsense]

I waited until yesterday to pay it. It’s sickening to pay that much money just to “own” a house. I applaud the ingenuity of the American politicians for coming up with this method of taxing the people, which I think is so wrong on so many grounds.

Interestingly, China is learning fast and is in the process of instituting this tax on property owners.

[nocommonsense]

I waited until yesterday to pay it. It’s sickening to pay that much money just to “own” a house. I applaud the ingenuity of the American politicians for coming up with this method of taxing the people, which I think is so wrong on so many grounds.

Interestingly, China is learning fast and is in the process of instituting this tax on property owners.

[nocommonsense]

The recent wikileaked stuff shed some very interesting light on China in this situation. Sounds like China despises North Karea as much as we do, but lacks the will to do the right things.

[nocommonsense]

The recent wikileaked stuff shed some very interesting light on China in this situation. Sounds like China despises North Karea as much as we do, but lacks the will to do the right things.

[nocommonsense]

The recent wikileaked stuff shed some very interesting light on China in this situation. Sounds like China despises North Karea as much as we do, but lacks the will to do the right things.

[nocommonsense]

The recent wikileaked stuff shed some very interesting light on China in this situation. Sounds like China despises North Karea as much as we do, but lacks the will to do the right things.

[Author]

Posts