[Kilohana]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Kilo: Wow. Yup, Peggy didn’t pull any punches, did she? To me, she represents good old fashioned conservatism (she was a speech writer for Reagan) and I have no doubt after hearing that what she really thinks.

Or Murphy, either.

Not that I was planning on voting for either McCain or Obama, but she taps into that rising discontent among “true” Republicans with how far the GOP has strayed from our roots and core beliefs.[/quote]

You know… I’m an Obama supporter, but this video just makes me sad. I suppose I could join the celebratory fray at DailyKos, but I just can’t. I love my country… This is heartbreaking to me. I almost feel like I’ve slipped into the Truman Show.

How anyone can watch this video and not conclude that it’s all a big game… I dunno. It upsets me. Noonan wrote a praise piece on Palin just the other day. Clearly, even she doesn’t believe a single word she wrote. I’ll bet she cashed the check already, too.

Noonan helped convince me to cast my first-ever ballot for Reagan. Right now, I’m just hurt. Call me naive, but I wanted to believe that the GOP believed they were doing the right thing. Party first, indeed.

Well, now that the cat’s out of the bag, let’s hear it. What do you really think about Obama, Mr. Carville?

[Kilohana]

Well, if there was ever any doubt, Peggy Noonan clears it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrG8w4bb3kg

Mike Murphy bats cleanup.

I was hoping they’d tell us what they really thought…. 😉

[Kilohana]

Well, if there was ever any doubt, Peggy Noonan clears it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrG8w4bb3kg

Mike Murphy bats cleanup.

I was hoping they’d tell us what they really thought…. 😉

[Kilohana]

Well, if there was ever any doubt, Peggy Noonan clears it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrG8w4bb3kg

Mike Murphy bats cleanup.

I was hoping they’d tell us what they really thought…. 😉

[Kilohana]

Well, if there was ever any doubt, Peggy Noonan clears it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrG8w4bb3kg

Mike Murphy bats cleanup.

I was hoping they’d tell us what they really thought…. 😉

[Kilohana]

Well, if there was ever any doubt, Peggy Noonan clears it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrG8w4bb3kg

Mike Murphy bats cleanup.

I was hoping they’d tell us what they really thought…. 😉

[Kilohana]

[quote=esmith]http://users.ixpres.com/~gtriphan[/quote]

Exactly! Thanks so much! 🙂

[Kilohana]

[quote=esmith]http://users.ixpres.com/~gtriphan[/quote]

Exactly! Thanks so much! 🙂

[Kilohana]

[quote=esmith]http://users.ixpres.com/~gtriphan[/quote]

Exactly! Thanks so much! 🙂

[Kilohana]

[quote=esmith]http://users.ixpres.com/~gtriphan[/quote]

Exactly! Thanks so much! 🙂

[Kilohana]

[quote=esmith]http://users.ixpres.com/~gtriphan[/quote]

Exactly! Thanks so much! 🙂

[Kilohana]

“There’s actually a new movement in the science world called Irreducible Complexity that discounts evolution as a means of how life came into existence. Google it.”

I Googled it. Took me one click to find Michael Behe – the guy behind Irreducible Complexity and the new laughingstock of the scientific community.

From his Wikipedia entry: “Behe’s claims about the irreducible complexity of key cellular structures are strongly contested by the scientific community. The Department of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University has published an official position statement which says “It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally, and should not be regarded as scientific.” Behe’s ideas about intelligent design have been rejected by the scientific community and characterized as pseudoscience.”

Is this a new movement – or more of same in a slick new package? Creationism –> Intelligent Design –> Irreducible Complexity –> “God did it.”

You have the right to believe whatever you want, but there is no reason to try to pass religious beliefs off as science. There’s no shame in having faith and believing in God. But please, stop trying to claim that religion = science. It’s ridiculous.

[Kilohana]

“There’s actually a new movement in the science world called Irreducible Complexity that discounts evolution as a means of how life came into existence. Google it.”

I Googled it. Took me one click to find Michael Behe – the guy behind Irreducible Complexity and the new laughingstock of the scientific community.

From his Wikipedia entry: “Behe’s claims about the irreducible complexity of key cellular structures are strongly contested by the scientific community. The Department of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University has published an official position statement which says “It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally, and should not be regarded as scientific.” Behe’s ideas about intelligent design have been rejected by the scientific community and characterized as pseudoscience.”

Is this a new movement – or more of same in a slick new package? Creationism –> Intelligent Design –> Irreducible Complexity –> “God did it.”

You have the right to believe whatever you want, but there is no reason to try to pass religious beliefs off as science. There’s no shame in having faith and believing in God. But please, stop trying to claim that religion = science. It’s ridiculous.

[Kilohana]

“There’s actually a new movement in the science world called Irreducible Complexity that discounts evolution as a means of how life came into existence. Google it.”

I Googled it. Took me one click to find Michael Behe – the guy behind Irreducible Complexity and the new laughingstock of the scientific community.

From his Wikipedia entry: “Behe’s claims about the irreducible complexity of key cellular structures are strongly contested by the scientific community. The Department of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University has published an official position statement which says “It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally, and should not be regarded as scientific.” Behe’s ideas about intelligent design have been rejected by the scientific community and characterized as pseudoscience.”

Is this a new movement – or more of same in a slick new package? Creationism –> Intelligent Design –> Irreducible Complexity –> “God did it.”

You have the right to believe whatever you want, but there is no reason to try to pass religious beliefs off as science. There’s no shame in having faith and believing in God. But please, stop trying to claim that religion = science. It’s ridiculous.

[Kilohana]

“There’s actually a new movement in the science world called Irreducible Complexity that discounts evolution as a means of how life came into existence. Google it.”

I Googled it. Took me one click to find Michael Behe – the guy behind Irreducible Complexity and the new laughingstock of the scientific community.

From his Wikipedia entry: “Behe’s claims about the irreducible complexity of key cellular structures are strongly contested by the scientific community. The Department of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University has published an official position statement which says “It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally, and should not be regarded as scientific.” Behe’s ideas about intelligent design have been rejected by the scientific community and characterized as pseudoscience.”

Is this a new movement – or more of same in a slick new package? Creationism –> Intelligent Design –> Irreducible Complexity –> “God did it.”

You have the right to believe whatever you want, but there is no reason to try to pass religious beliefs off as science. There’s no shame in having faith and believing in God. But please, stop trying to claim that religion = science. It’s ridiculous.

[Author]

Posts