- This topic has 700 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 2, 2008 at 12:59 PM #265359September 2, 2008 at 1:30 PM #265065Allan from FallbrookParticipant
sdn: I have it, and it is a good read.
The Jesuits have authority over matters of heresy, while the Dominicans have authority over areas of moral obedience and there was thusly an overlap during the Inquisition.
The Jesuits also used the Office of Holy Inquisition (which lasted for hundreds of years and wasn’t solely confined to Spain) to advance their power within the Church, to the point where they were denounced as a heretical order.
They now run the Society for the Propogation of the Faith, which is an interesting little outfit all it’s own.
September 2, 2008 at 1:30 PM #265276Allan from FallbrookParticipantsdn: I have it, and it is a good read.
The Jesuits have authority over matters of heresy, while the Dominicans have authority over areas of moral obedience and there was thusly an overlap during the Inquisition.
The Jesuits also used the Office of Holy Inquisition (which lasted for hundreds of years and wasn’t solely confined to Spain) to advance their power within the Church, to the point where they were denounced as a heretical order.
They now run the Society for the Propogation of the Faith, which is an interesting little outfit all it’s own.
September 2, 2008 at 1:30 PM #265281Allan from FallbrookParticipantsdn: I have it, and it is a good read.
The Jesuits have authority over matters of heresy, while the Dominicans have authority over areas of moral obedience and there was thusly an overlap during the Inquisition.
The Jesuits also used the Office of Holy Inquisition (which lasted for hundreds of years and wasn’t solely confined to Spain) to advance their power within the Church, to the point where they were denounced as a heretical order.
They now run the Society for the Propogation of the Faith, which is an interesting little outfit all it’s own.
September 2, 2008 at 1:30 PM #265335Allan from FallbrookParticipantsdn: I have it, and it is a good read.
The Jesuits have authority over matters of heresy, while the Dominicans have authority over areas of moral obedience and there was thusly an overlap during the Inquisition.
The Jesuits also used the Office of Holy Inquisition (which lasted for hundreds of years and wasn’t solely confined to Spain) to advance their power within the Church, to the point where they were denounced as a heretical order.
They now run the Society for the Propogation of the Faith, which is an interesting little outfit all it’s own.
September 2, 2008 at 1:30 PM #265374Allan from FallbrookParticipantsdn: I have it, and it is a good read.
The Jesuits have authority over matters of heresy, while the Dominicans have authority over areas of moral obedience and there was thusly an overlap during the Inquisition.
The Jesuits also used the Office of Holy Inquisition (which lasted for hundreds of years and wasn’t solely confined to Spain) to advance their power within the Church, to the point where they were denounced as a heretical order.
They now run the Society for the Propogation of the Faith, which is an interesting little outfit all it’s own.
September 2, 2008 at 8:47 PM #265212ArrayaParticipantNo thank you…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html
Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”
September 2, 2008 at 8:47 PM #265430ArrayaParticipantNo thank you…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html
Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”
September 2, 2008 at 8:47 PM #265444ArrayaParticipantNo thank you…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html
Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”
September 2, 2008 at 8:47 PM #265486ArrayaParticipantNo thank you…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html
Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”
September 2, 2008 at 8:47 PM #265521ArrayaParticipantNo thank you…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html
Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”
September 2, 2008 at 9:21 PM #265232jpinpbParticipantnostra – I felt the same way and agree w/you. It is the most transparent political move ever. Out of all the political women out there, he picks a governor – of Alaska. And also, let’s get the religious vote for sure. She’s a poster child for pro-life. God help us if he’s our president at 72 something happens to him, she’s running our country. Wow. I just can’t even think of it. I just shudder. This will almost make GW look good.
She is running for VP, but the position of VP is to be Pres in the event of whatever, so you have to make sure that person would/could handle it.
(as in Cheney can handle it if something happens to GW, since he seems to be running the show and pulling the strings behind the scene so far)
And I think it is a personal decision to take on a Down Syndrome baby. You choose to have that baby, it is your responsibility to love and care for her/him. Does that mean dropping it off on nanny?
Lastly, I agree w/patientlywaiting. One is a political figure and one can’t make sure their 17 yo daughter does not get pregnant? So she’s pro-life (against abortion) does not believe in birth control or condoms? Against sex-ed. How about waiting until you get married before you breed then. Very trailer-trash. Got the 17yo pregnant daughter w/a shot-gun wedding. Nice.
I guess that’s all there is to do in Alaska is breed.
And that’s not even really addressing her experience. I’d have rather seen C. Rice. This is the best he can come up with?
September 2, 2008 at 9:21 PM #265450jpinpbParticipantnostra – I felt the same way and agree w/you. It is the most transparent political move ever. Out of all the political women out there, he picks a governor – of Alaska. And also, let’s get the religious vote for sure. She’s a poster child for pro-life. God help us if he’s our president at 72 something happens to him, she’s running our country. Wow. I just can’t even think of it. I just shudder. This will almost make GW look good.
She is running for VP, but the position of VP is to be Pres in the event of whatever, so you have to make sure that person would/could handle it.
(as in Cheney can handle it if something happens to GW, since he seems to be running the show and pulling the strings behind the scene so far)
And I think it is a personal decision to take on a Down Syndrome baby. You choose to have that baby, it is your responsibility to love and care for her/him. Does that mean dropping it off on nanny?
Lastly, I agree w/patientlywaiting. One is a political figure and one can’t make sure their 17 yo daughter does not get pregnant? So she’s pro-life (against abortion) does not believe in birth control or condoms? Against sex-ed. How about waiting until you get married before you breed then. Very trailer-trash. Got the 17yo pregnant daughter w/a shot-gun wedding. Nice.
I guess that’s all there is to do in Alaska is breed.
And that’s not even really addressing her experience. I’d have rather seen C. Rice. This is the best he can come up with?
September 2, 2008 at 9:21 PM #265461jpinpbParticipantnostra – I felt the same way and agree w/you. It is the most transparent political move ever. Out of all the political women out there, he picks a governor – of Alaska. And also, let’s get the religious vote for sure. She’s a poster child for pro-life. God help us if he’s our president at 72 something happens to him, she’s running our country. Wow. I just can’t even think of it. I just shudder. This will almost make GW look good.
She is running for VP, but the position of VP is to be Pres in the event of whatever, so you have to make sure that person would/could handle it.
(as in Cheney can handle it if something happens to GW, since he seems to be running the show and pulling the strings behind the scene so far)
And I think it is a personal decision to take on a Down Syndrome baby. You choose to have that baby, it is your responsibility to love and care for her/him. Does that mean dropping it off on nanny?
Lastly, I agree w/patientlywaiting. One is a political figure and one can’t make sure their 17 yo daughter does not get pregnant? So she’s pro-life (against abortion) does not believe in birth control or condoms? Against sex-ed. How about waiting until you get married before you breed then. Very trailer-trash. Got the 17yo pregnant daughter w/a shot-gun wedding. Nice.
I guess that’s all there is to do in Alaska is breed.
And that’s not even really addressing her experience. I’d have rather seen C. Rice. This is the best he can come up with?
September 2, 2008 at 9:21 PM #265506jpinpbParticipantnostra – I felt the same way and agree w/you. It is the most transparent political move ever. Out of all the political women out there, he picks a governor – of Alaska. And also, let’s get the religious vote for sure. She’s a poster child for pro-life. God help us if he’s our president at 72 something happens to him, she’s running our country. Wow. I just can’t even think of it. I just shudder. This will almost make GW look good.
She is running for VP, but the position of VP is to be Pres in the event of whatever, so you have to make sure that person would/could handle it.
(as in Cheney can handle it if something happens to GW, since he seems to be running the show and pulling the strings behind the scene so far)
And I think it is a personal decision to take on a Down Syndrome baby. You choose to have that baby, it is your responsibility to love and care for her/him. Does that mean dropping it off on nanny?
Lastly, I agree w/patientlywaiting. One is a political figure and one can’t make sure their 17 yo daughter does not get pregnant? So she’s pro-life (against abortion) does not believe in birth control or condoms? Against sex-ed. How about waiting until you get married before you breed then. Very trailer-trash. Got the 17yo pregnant daughter w/a shot-gun wedding. Nice.
I guess that’s all there is to do in Alaska is breed.
And that’s not even really addressing her experience. I’d have rather seen C. Rice. This is the best he can come up with?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.