- This topic has 700 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2008 at 1:49 PM #263469August 29, 2008 at 1:56 PM #263171BugsParticipant
It’s ironic that the skills necessary to win an election have nothing to do with the skills necessary to excel in the performance of the duties of the office. The choices of both Palin and Obama both appear to based primarily on winning the office, not on actually governing the nation.
We truly do deserve the government we elect.
August 29, 2008 at 1:56 PM #263379BugsParticipantIt’s ironic that the skills necessary to win an election have nothing to do with the skills necessary to excel in the performance of the duties of the office. The choices of both Palin and Obama both appear to based primarily on winning the office, not on actually governing the nation.
We truly do deserve the government we elect.
August 29, 2008 at 1:56 PM #263383BugsParticipantIt’s ironic that the skills necessary to win an election have nothing to do with the skills necessary to excel in the performance of the duties of the office. The choices of both Palin and Obama both appear to based primarily on winning the office, not on actually governing the nation.
We truly do deserve the government we elect.
August 29, 2008 at 1:56 PM #263436BugsParticipantIt’s ironic that the skills necessary to win an election have nothing to do with the skills necessary to excel in the performance of the duties of the office. The choices of both Palin and Obama both appear to based primarily on winning the office, not on actually governing the nation.
We truly do deserve the government we elect.
August 29, 2008 at 1:56 PM #263474BugsParticipantIt’s ironic that the skills necessary to win an election have nothing to do with the skills necessary to excel in the performance of the duties of the office. The choices of both Palin and Obama both appear to based primarily on winning the office, not on actually governing the nation.
We truly do deserve the government we elect.
August 29, 2008 at 2:43 PM #263190bsrsharmaParticipantMy first reaction was this song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgDZOhQbmRslyrics are at
http://www.risa.co.uk/sla/song.php?songid=25626August 29, 2008 at 2:43 PM #263399bsrsharmaParticipantMy first reaction was this song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgDZOhQbmRslyrics are at
http://www.risa.co.uk/sla/song.php?songid=25626August 29, 2008 at 2:43 PM #263404bsrsharmaParticipantMy first reaction was this song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgDZOhQbmRslyrics are at
http://www.risa.co.uk/sla/song.php?songid=25626August 29, 2008 at 2:43 PM #263456bsrsharmaParticipantMy first reaction was this song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgDZOhQbmRslyrics are at
http://www.risa.co.uk/sla/song.php?songid=25626August 29, 2008 at 2:43 PM #263494bsrsharmaParticipantMy first reaction was this song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgDZOhQbmRslyrics are at
http://www.risa.co.uk/sla/song.php?songid=25626August 29, 2008 at 4:34 PM #263230svelteParticipantI came to the conclusion long ago that we are, indeed, that shallow as a nation.
We always have been, it’s nothing new. VPs have always been chosen based on their ability to “shore up” the ticket, not on whether they are the next-best person in the country to be prez in case the unspeakable happens. One has to look no farther than Dan Quayle to see another recent case.
In that respect, McCain did indeed make a great strategic pick.
August 29, 2008 at 4:34 PM #263438svelteParticipantI came to the conclusion long ago that we are, indeed, that shallow as a nation.
We always have been, it’s nothing new. VPs have always been chosen based on their ability to “shore up” the ticket, not on whether they are the next-best person in the country to be prez in case the unspeakable happens. One has to look no farther than Dan Quayle to see another recent case.
In that respect, McCain did indeed make a great strategic pick.
August 29, 2008 at 4:34 PM #263443svelteParticipantI came to the conclusion long ago that we are, indeed, that shallow as a nation.
We always have been, it’s nothing new. VPs have always been chosen based on their ability to “shore up” the ticket, not on whether they are the next-best person in the country to be prez in case the unspeakable happens. One has to look no farther than Dan Quayle to see another recent case.
In that respect, McCain did indeed make a great strategic pick.
August 29, 2008 at 4:34 PM #263496svelteParticipantI came to the conclusion long ago that we are, indeed, that shallow as a nation.
We always have been, it’s nothing new. VPs have always been chosen based on their ability to “shore up” the ticket, not on whether they are the next-best person in the country to be prez in case the unspeakable happens. One has to look no farther than Dan Quayle to see another recent case.
In that respect, McCain did indeed make a great strategic pick.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.