Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 14, 2007 at 12:36 PM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99460November 14, 2007 at 12:36 PM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99453
jyurasek02
ParticipantAccording to this DQ article, prices have only reached the Spring 2005 levels:
November 14, 2007 at 12:36 PM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99437ParticipantAccording to this DQ article, prices have only reached the Spring 2005 levels:
November 14, 2007 at 12:36 PM in reply to: Home prices back to 2003 levels – according to the UT #99375ParticipantAccording to this DQ article, prices have only reached the Spring 2005 levels:
ParticipantIs there something special about posting graphs here?
ParticipantIs there something special about posting graphs here?
ParticipantIs there something special about posting graphs here?
ParticipantIs there something special about posting graphs here?
ParticipantI like how you are tracking this area. It is a very nice area, and I would strongly consider buying. However, I am trying to understand how to use this data to understand the changing markets. I know a lot has to do with the supply and demand of the area, and the volume and sales. Rustico had stated in another thread to use the listing to pending sales ratio and how they change. How can apply this on a week by week basis? Don’t I need a cumlative number to compare the total listings to total transactions?
He also stated that I understand the distress of an area and the cost of owning vs. renting. I get the owning vs. renting analysis a bit, but the distress I am little confused on. Is this simply the NOT’s and REO’s? Let me know how that can factor into the analysis.
ParticipantI like how you are tracking this area. It is a very nice area, and I would strongly consider buying. However, I am trying to understand how to use this data to understand the changing markets. I know a lot has to do with the supply and demand of the area, and the volume and sales. Rustico had stated in another thread to use the listing to pending sales ratio and how they change. How can apply this on a week by week basis? Don’t I need a cumlative number to compare the total listings to total transactions?
He also stated that I understand the distress of an area and the cost of owning vs. renting. I get the owning vs. renting analysis a bit, but the distress I am little confused on. Is this simply the NOT’s and REO’s? Let me know how that can factor into the analysis.
ParticipantI like how you are tracking this area. It is a very nice area, and I would strongly consider buying. However, I am trying to understand how to use this data to understand the changing markets. I know a lot has to do with the supply and demand of the area, and the volume and sales. Rustico had stated in another thread to use the listing to pending sales ratio and how they change. How can apply this on a week by week basis? Don’t I need a cumlative number to compare the total listings to total transactions?
He also stated that I understand the distress of an area and the cost of owning vs. renting. I get the owning vs. renting analysis a bit, but the distress I am little confused on. Is this simply the NOT’s and REO’s? Let me know how that can factor into the analysis.
ParticipantI like how you are tracking this area. It is a very nice area, and I would strongly consider buying. However, I am trying to understand how to use this data to understand the changing markets. I know a lot has to do with the supply and demand of the area, and the volume and sales. Rustico had stated in another thread to use the listing to pending sales ratio and how they change. How can apply this on a week by week basis? Don’t I need a cumlative number to compare the total listings to total transactions?
He also stated that I understand the distress of an area and the cost of owning vs. renting. I get the owning vs. renting analysis a bit, but the distress I am little confused on. Is this simply the NOT’s and REO’s? Let me know how that can factor into the analysis.
ParticipantGreat! Thanks for the feedback. I guess the first step is to start tracking these numbers. How can I gather the correct information to start tracking this information by zipcode? I think some people have some threads doing this sort of thing for Carmel Valley. The only other question I would have is the “distress” element. Would that be the foreclosures and NOT’s and NOD’s?
ParticipantGreat! Thanks for the feedback. I guess the first step is to start tracking these numbers. How can I gather the correct information to start tracking this information by zipcode? I think some people have some threads doing this sort of thing for Carmel Valley. The only other question I would have is the “distress” element. Would that be the foreclosures and NOT’s and NOD’s?
ParticipantGreat! Thanks for the feedback. I guess the first step is to start tracking these numbers. How can I gather the correct information to start tracking this information by zipcode? I think some people have some threads doing this sort of thing for Carmel Valley. The only other question I would have is the “distress” element. Would that be the foreclosures and NOT’s and NOD’s?
-
AuthorPosts