- This topic has 65 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 28, 2009 at 10:05 PM #451137August 28, 2009 at 10:11 PM #450352SD RealtorParticipant
Yep I agree 100%. Gotta view this as an opportunity to make some money and build the pile up bigger because if (when) interest rate shock does come, cash will be king king king… You are right PR.
August 28, 2009 at 10:11 PM #450543SD RealtorParticipantYep I agree 100%. Gotta view this as an opportunity to make some money and build the pile up bigger because if (when) interest rate shock does come, cash will be king king king… You are right PR.
August 28, 2009 at 10:11 PM #450879SD RealtorParticipantYep I agree 100%. Gotta view this as an opportunity to make some money and build the pile up bigger because if (when) interest rate shock does come, cash will be king king king… You are right PR.
August 28, 2009 at 10:11 PM #450953SD RealtorParticipantYep I agree 100%. Gotta view this as an opportunity to make some money and build the pile up bigger because if (when) interest rate shock does come, cash will be king king king… You are right PR.
August 28, 2009 at 10:11 PM #451142SD RealtorParticipantYep I agree 100%. Gotta view this as an opportunity to make some money and build the pile up bigger because if (when) interest rate shock does come, cash will be king king king… You are right PR.
August 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM #450392CA renterParticipant[quote=patientrenter][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]…this is the government’s way of attempting a “soft landing” in terms of market valuation on those toxic assets.[/quote]
If I were not a cynic, Allan, I would believe this. My cynical side says that what’s really going on is redirecting the consequences of bad actions from the principal orchestraters and beneficiaries to the innocent bystanders. In other words, my cynical side tells me the soft landing is marketed as a rescue for us all, but it’s really a smokescreen for a painless escape by the primary perpretators.[/quote]
So true, PR.
SDR, that must be a trick question, right? π
Of course, those with the gold make the rules, and we peasants on the ground can just hope that a few crumbs fall our way.
It’s most unsettling to see all this going on, and the worst aspect of it all, is that is being done in broad daylight, for the most part. They’re giving taxpayer money, hand-over-fist, to the very parties who caused all the problems…and nobody in power seems to have any problem with it.
Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
Frustrating, frustrating, frustrating.
…oh, but the conversations I’ve had that led to my post actually do give me hope. It sounds like lots and lots of “investors” (both small and large) are buying real estate right now; and every one of them is expecting to sell it to some greater fool for a profit sometime in the future. Now, THAT is what I’m waiting for. π
August 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM #450583CA renterParticipant[quote=patientrenter][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]…this is the government’s way of attempting a “soft landing” in terms of market valuation on those toxic assets.[/quote]
If I were not a cynic, Allan, I would believe this. My cynical side says that what’s really going on is redirecting the consequences of bad actions from the principal orchestraters and beneficiaries to the innocent bystanders. In other words, my cynical side tells me the soft landing is marketed as a rescue for us all, but it’s really a smokescreen for a painless escape by the primary perpretators.[/quote]
So true, PR.
SDR, that must be a trick question, right? π
Of course, those with the gold make the rules, and we peasants on the ground can just hope that a few crumbs fall our way.
It’s most unsettling to see all this going on, and the worst aspect of it all, is that is being done in broad daylight, for the most part. They’re giving taxpayer money, hand-over-fist, to the very parties who caused all the problems…and nobody in power seems to have any problem with it.
Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
Frustrating, frustrating, frustrating.
…oh, but the conversations I’ve had that led to my post actually do give me hope. It sounds like lots and lots of “investors” (both small and large) are buying real estate right now; and every one of them is expecting to sell it to some greater fool for a profit sometime in the future. Now, THAT is what I’m waiting for. π
August 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM #450919CA renterParticipant[quote=patientrenter][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]…this is the government’s way of attempting a “soft landing” in terms of market valuation on those toxic assets.[/quote]
If I were not a cynic, Allan, I would believe this. My cynical side says that what’s really going on is redirecting the consequences of bad actions from the principal orchestraters and beneficiaries to the innocent bystanders. In other words, my cynical side tells me the soft landing is marketed as a rescue for us all, but it’s really a smokescreen for a painless escape by the primary perpretators.[/quote]
So true, PR.
SDR, that must be a trick question, right? π
Of course, those with the gold make the rules, and we peasants on the ground can just hope that a few crumbs fall our way.
It’s most unsettling to see all this going on, and the worst aspect of it all, is that is being done in broad daylight, for the most part. They’re giving taxpayer money, hand-over-fist, to the very parties who caused all the problems…and nobody in power seems to have any problem with it.
Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
Frustrating, frustrating, frustrating.
…oh, but the conversations I’ve had that led to my post actually do give me hope. It sounds like lots and lots of “investors” (both small and large) are buying real estate right now; and every one of them is expecting to sell it to some greater fool for a profit sometime in the future. Now, THAT is what I’m waiting for. π
August 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM #450994CA renterParticipant[quote=patientrenter][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]…this is the government’s way of attempting a “soft landing” in terms of market valuation on those toxic assets.[/quote]
If I were not a cynic, Allan, I would believe this. My cynical side says that what’s really going on is redirecting the consequences of bad actions from the principal orchestraters and beneficiaries to the innocent bystanders. In other words, my cynical side tells me the soft landing is marketed as a rescue for us all, but it’s really a smokescreen for a painless escape by the primary perpretators.[/quote]
So true, PR.
SDR, that must be a trick question, right? π
Of course, those with the gold make the rules, and we peasants on the ground can just hope that a few crumbs fall our way.
It’s most unsettling to see all this going on, and the worst aspect of it all, is that is being done in broad daylight, for the most part. They’re giving taxpayer money, hand-over-fist, to the very parties who caused all the problems…and nobody in power seems to have any problem with it.
Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
Frustrating, frustrating, frustrating.
…oh, but the conversations I’ve had that led to my post actually do give me hope. It sounds like lots and lots of “investors” (both small and large) are buying real estate right now; and every one of them is expecting to sell it to some greater fool for a profit sometime in the future. Now, THAT is what I’m waiting for. π
August 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM #451182CA renterParticipant[quote=patientrenter][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]…this is the government’s way of attempting a “soft landing” in terms of market valuation on those toxic assets.[/quote]
If I were not a cynic, Allan, I would believe this. My cynical side says that what’s really going on is redirecting the consequences of bad actions from the principal orchestraters and beneficiaries to the innocent bystanders. In other words, my cynical side tells me the soft landing is marketed as a rescue for us all, but it’s really a smokescreen for a painless escape by the primary perpretators.[/quote]
So true, PR.
SDR, that must be a trick question, right? π
Of course, those with the gold make the rules, and we peasants on the ground can just hope that a few crumbs fall our way.
It’s most unsettling to see all this going on, and the worst aspect of it all, is that is being done in broad daylight, for the most part. They’re giving taxpayer money, hand-over-fist, to the very parties who caused all the problems…and nobody in power seems to have any problem with it.
Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
Frustrating, frustrating, frustrating.
…oh, but the conversations I’ve had that led to my post actually do give me hope. It sounds like lots and lots of “investors” (both small and large) are buying real estate right now; and every one of them is expecting to sell it to some greater fool for a profit sometime in the future. Now, THAT is what I’m waiting for. π
August 29, 2009 at 7:40 AM #450422Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=CA renter]Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
[/quote]
CAR: Paulson’s claim is going to rank right up there with O.J.’s claim, post-acquittal, that he’d be beating the bushes and looking for Ron and Nicole’s murderer. Of course, beating the bushes was code for playing golf.
The American people have shown themselves willing to be gulled into just about anything, whether it’s standing by idly and watching as our civil liberties are stripped from us (FISA, Patriot Acts I & II, wireless wiretapping) or allowing the government to fully co-opt shareholder/bondholder owned businesses (Chrysler and GM) or spend our money to enrich or bail out their cronies (everything from Carlyle Group and Halliburton under Bush to AIG and Goldman under Obama).
And we’ve stood by and done nothing. When we have protested or dissented, we’ve been referred to as un-American (Pelosi) and this while engaging in the most American activity of all.
August 29, 2009 at 7:40 AM #450612Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=CA renter]Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
[/quote]
CAR: Paulson’s claim is going to rank right up there with O.J.’s claim, post-acquittal, that he’d be beating the bushes and looking for Ron and Nicole’s murderer. Of course, beating the bushes was code for playing golf.
The American people have shown themselves willing to be gulled into just about anything, whether it’s standing by idly and watching as our civil liberties are stripped from us (FISA, Patriot Acts I & II, wireless wiretapping) or allowing the government to fully co-opt shareholder/bondholder owned businesses (Chrysler and GM) or spend our money to enrich or bail out their cronies (everything from Carlyle Group and Halliburton under Bush to AIG and Goldman under Obama).
And we’ve stood by and done nothing. When we have protested or dissented, we’ve been referred to as un-American (Pelosi) and this while engaging in the most American activity of all.
August 29, 2009 at 7:40 AM #450950Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=CA renter]Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
[/quote]
CAR: Paulson’s claim is going to rank right up there with O.J.’s claim, post-acquittal, that he’d be beating the bushes and looking for Ron and Nicole’s murderer. Of course, beating the bushes was code for playing golf.
The American people have shown themselves willing to be gulled into just about anything, whether it’s standing by idly and watching as our civil liberties are stripped from us (FISA, Patriot Acts I & II, wireless wiretapping) or allowing the government to fully co-opt shareholder/bondholder owned businesses (Chrysler and GM) or spend our money to enrich or bail out their cronies (everything from Carlyle Group and Halliburton under Bush to AIG and Goldman under Obama).
And we’ve stood by and done nothing. When we have protested or dissented, we’ve been referred to as un-American (Pelosi) and this while engaging in the most American activity of all.
August 29, 2009 at 7:40 AM #451024Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=CA renter]Whatever happened to Hank Paulson’s claim that we would look for the guilty parties when the “crisis” is averted. Gosh, with all the green shoots an’ stuff, you’d think they’d be beating the bushes already looking for the “guilty perpetrators.”
[/quote]
CAR: Paulson’s claim is going to rank right up there with O.J.’s claim, post-acquittal, that he’d be beating the bushes and looking for Ron and Nicole’s murderer. Of course, beating the bushes was code for playing golf.
The American people have shown themselves willing to be gulled into just about anything, whether it’s standing by idly and watching as our civil liberties are stripped from us (FISA, Patriot Acts I & II, wireless wiretapping) or allowing the government to fully co-opt shareholder/bondholder owned businesses (Chrysler and GM) or spend our money to enrich or bail out their cronies (everything from Carlyle Group and Halliburton under Bush to AIG and Goldman under Obama).
And we’ve stood by and done nothing. When we have protested or dissented, we’ve been referred to as un-American (Pelosi) and this while engaging in the most American activity of all.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.