- This topic has 265 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by
CAwireman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2011 at 11:08 AM #704086June 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM #702895
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=briansd1]…There is no reason for large lots in the city. Let the owners easily sell and cash out, if they wish. New owners can build more dense units to accomodate the growing population.
Cities grow and change. You can’t freeze things in time.[/quote]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. Thus, you won’t see in your lifetime what you are proposing here. I don’t believe upzoning of prime CA coastal RE will ever happen, or, for that matter, east coast enclaves such as the small cities and towns on Long Island, state of NY.
It is unrealistic to expect the masses, incl young families who may want to live on one mid to low income, to be able to afford to reside in these coveted “prime” areas of the US. That’s why there are many other areas of SD County, the state and the country from which to choose housing to buy or rent.
All is as it “should be.”
June 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM #702993Participant[quote=briansd1]…There is no reason for large lots in the city. Let the owners easily sell and cash out, if they wish. New owners can build more dense units to accomodate the growing population.
Cities grow and change. You can’t freeze things in time.[/quote]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. Thus, you won’t see in your lifetime what you are proposing here. I don’t believe upzoning of prime CA coastal RE will ever happen, or, for that matter, east coast enclaves such as the small cities and towns on Long Island, state of NY.
It is unrealistic to expect the masses, incl young families who may want to live on one mid to low income, to be able to afford to reside in these coveted “prime” areas of the US. That’s why there are many other areas of SD County, the state and the country from which to choose housing to buy or rent.
All is as it “should be.”
June 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM #703584Participant[quote=briansd1]…There is no reason for large lots in the city. Let the owners easily sell and cash out, if they wish. New owners can build more dense units to accomodate the growing population.
Cities grow and change. You can’t freeze things in time.[/quote]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. Thus, you won’t see in your lifetime what you are proposing here. I don’t believe upzoning of prime CA coastal RE will ever happen, or, for that matter, east coast enclaves such as the small cities and towns on Long Island, state of NY.
It is unrealistic to expect the masses, incl young families who may want to live on one mid to low income, to be able to afford to reside in these coveted “prime” areas of the US. That’s why there are many other areas of SD County, the state and the country from which to choose housing to buy or rent.
All is as it “should be.”
June 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM #703732Participant[quote=briansd1]…There is no reason for large lots in the city. Let the owners easily sell and cash out, if they wish. New owners can build more dense units to accomodate the growing population.
Cities grow and change. You can’t freeze things in time.[/quote]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. Thus, you won’t see in your lifetime what you are proposing here. I don’t believe upzoning of prime CA coastal RE will ever happen, or, for that matter, east coast enclaves such as the small cities and towns on Long Island, state of NY.
It is unrealistic to expect the masses, incl young families who may want to live on one mid to low income, to be able to afford to reside in these coveted “prime” areas of the US. That’s why there are many other areas of SD County, the state and the country from which to choose housing to buy or rent.
All is as it “should be.”
June 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM #704091Participant[quote=briansd1]…There is no reason for large lots in the city. Let the owners easily sell and cash out, if they wish. New owners can build more dense units to accomodate the growing population.
Cities grow and change. You can’t freeze things in time.[/quote]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. Thus, you won’t see in your lifetime what you are proposing here. I don’t believe upzoning of prime CA coastal RE will ever happen, or, for that matter, east coast enclaves such as the small cities and towns on Long Island, state of NY.
It is unrealistic to expect the masses, incl young families who may want to live on one mid to low income, to be able to afford to reside in these coveted “prime” areas of the US. That’s why there are many other areas of SD County, the state and the country from which to choose housing to buy or rent.
All is as it “should be.”
June 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM #702905briansd1
Guest[quote=bearishgurl]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. [/quote]I agree, BG, that’s why there’s slow progress.
Don’t complain about sprawl when people move to the suburbs and excurbs, beyond the reach of San Diego city zoning restrictions.
As sprawl continues, the voters will demand more and more highways/freeways, which beget more sprawl.
To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.
June 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM #703003Guest[quote=bearishgurl]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. [/quote]I agree, BG, that’s why there’s slow progress.
Don’t complain about sprawl when people move to the suburbs and excurbs, beyond the reach of San Diego city zoning restrictions.
As sprawl continues, the voters will demand more and more highways/freeways, which beget more sprawl.
To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.
June 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM #703594Guest[quote=bearishgurl]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. [/quote]I agree, BG, that’s why there’s slow progress.
Don’t complain about sprawl when people move to the suburbs and excurbs, beyond the reach of San Diego city zoning restrictions.
As sprawl continues, the voters will demand more and more highways/freeways, which beget more sprawl.
To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.
June 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM #703742Guest[quote=bearishgurl]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. [/quote]I agree, BG, that’s why there’s slow progress.
Don’t complain about sprawl when people move to the suburbs and excurbs, beyond the reach of San Diego city zoning restrictions.
As sprawl continues, the voters will demand more and more highways/freeways, which beget more sprawl.
To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.
June 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM #704101Guest[quote=bearishgurl]
brian, my “attitude” is shared by many who reside in CA coastal counties and other desirable areas throughout the nation. [/quote]I agree, BG, that’s why there’s slow progress.
Don’t complain about sprawl when people move to the suburbs and excurbs, beyond the reach of San Diego city zoning restrictions.
As sprawl continues, the voters will demand more and more highways/freeways, which beget more sprawl.
To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.
June 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM #702940Participant[quote=briansd1] . . . To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.[/quote]
You and I differ on opinion here. Any “real” increases in SD County’s population now and in the foreseeable future can be accommodated by existing housing (already built), both SFR and multifamily. SD County does not need any more building to occur for many years to come to meet its needs, IMO. There is PLENTY available, everywhere, and more “in the pipeline” via current distressed properties.
June 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM #703039Participant[quote=briansd1] . . . To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.[/quote]
You and I differ on opinion here. Any “real” increases in SD County’s population now and in the foreseeable future can be accommodated by existing housing (already built), both SFR and multifamily. SD County does not need any more building to occur for many years to come to meet its needs, IMO. There is PLENTY available, everywhere, and more “in the pipeline” via current distressed properties.
June 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM #703629Participant[quote=briansd1] . . . To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.[/quote]
You and I differ on opinion here. Any “real” increases in SD County’s population now and in the foreseeable future can be accommodated by existing housing (already built), both SFR and multifamily. SD County does not need any more building to occur for many years to come to meet its needs, IMO. There is PLENTY available, everywhere, and more “in the pipeline” via current distressed properties.
June 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM #703777Participant[quote=briansd1] . . . To accommodate increases in population, we need to build up or build out. There’s no other way around it.[/quote]
You and I differ on opinion here. Any “real” increases in SD County’s population now and in the foreseeable future can be accommodated by existing housing (already built), both SFR and multifamily. SD County does not need any more building to occur for many years to come to meet its needs, IMO. There is PLENTY available, everywhere, and more “in the pipeline” via current distressed properties.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.