- This topic has 255 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by Ex-SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 9, 2008 at 1:58 PM #150793February 9, 2008 at 6:00 PM #150495larrylujackParticipant
Illegals vote all the time.
really? where’s the proof?
Chicago has had a history of corrupt voting in the 60s no doubt, but I have not heard of verified evidence that there is widespread voting of illegals. And no, I don’t consider right wing blogs as evidence. You do need ID to vote (I have always been asked for one) and your anecdotal story does not prove that “Illegals vote all the time.”
I think you just hate immigrants cause your lazy or stupid and can’t compete for the low end jobs they take.
February 9, 2008 at 6:00 PM #150755larrylujackParticipantIllegals vote all the time.
really? where’s the proof?
Chicago has had a history of corrupt voting in the 60s no doubt, but I have not heard of verified evidence that there is widespread voting of illegals. And no, I don’t consider right wing blogs as evidence. You do need ID to vote (I have always been asked for one) and your anecdotal story does not prove that “Illegals vote all the time.”
I think you just hate immigrants cause your lazy or stupid and can’t compete for the low end jobs they take.
February 9, 2008 at 6:00 PM #150767larrylujackParticipantIllegals vote all the time.
really? where’s the proof?
Chicago has had a history of corrupt voting in the 60s no doubt, but I have not heard of verified evidence that there is widespread voting of illegals. And no, I don’t consider right wing blogs as evidence. You do need ID to vote (I have always been asked for one) and your anecdotal story does not prove that “Illegals vote all the time.”
I think you just hate immigrants cause your lazy or stupid and can’t compete for the low end jobs they take.
February 9, 2008 at 6:00 PM #150782larrylujackParticipantIllegals vote all the time.
really? where’s the proof?
Chicago has had a history of corrupt voting in the 60s no doubt, but I have not heard of verified evidence that there is widespread voting of illegals. And no, I don’t consider right wing blogs as evidence. You do need ID to vote (I have always been asked for one) and your anecdotal story does not prove that “Illegals vote all the time.”
I think you just hate immigrants cause your lazy or stupid and can’t compete for the low end jobs they take.
February 9, 2008 at 6:00 PM #150853larrylujackParticipantIllegals vote all the time.
really? where’s the proof?
Chicago has had a history of corrupt voting in the 60s no doubt, but I have not heard of verified evidence that there is widespread voting of illegals. And no, I don’t consider right wing blogs as evidence. You do need ID to vote (I have always been asked for one) and your anecdotal story does not prove that “Illegals vote all the time.”
I think you just hate immigrants cause your lazy or stupid and can’t compete for the low end jobs they take.
February 9, 2008 at 6:07 PM #150515bsrsharmaParticipantWhat is the Quid Pro Quo for illegals to vote? Plenty of Citizens don’t care to vote knowing full well they are selecting the national leaders. What does an illegal, who has no clue, probably doesn’t know the language of the ballot or instructions, get by wasting his/her time to engage in a completely meaningless ritual? Unless someone can show there is vote buying for cash/kind, these allegations are red herrings (and probably thinly veiled racism against Hispanic political activism). One can fully be opposed to illegal immigration without becoming an “illegal voting” alarmist.
February 9, 2008 at 6:07 PM #150775bsrsharmaParticipantWhat is the Quid Pro Quo for illegals to vote? Plenty of Citizens don’t care to vote knowing full well they are selecting the national leaders. What does an illegal, who has no clue, probably doesn’t know the language of the ballot or instructions, get by wasting his/her time to engage in a completely meaningless ritual? Unless someone can show there is vote buying for cash/kind, these allegations are red herrings (and probably thinly veiled racism against Hispanic political activism). One can fully be opposed to illegal immigration without becoming an “illegal voting” alarmist.
February 9, 2008 at 6:07 PM #150786bsrsharmaParticipantWhat is the Quid Pro Quo for illegals to vote? Plenty of Citizens don’t care to vote knowing full well they are selecting the national leaders. What does an illegal, who has no clue, probably doesn’t know the language of the ballot or instructions, get by wasting his/her time to engage in a completely meaningless ritual? Unless someone can show there is vote buying for cash/kind, these allegations are red herrings (and probably thinly veiled racism against Hispanic political activism). One can fully be opposed to illegal immigration without becoming an “illegal voting” alarmist.
February 9, 2008 at 6:07 PM #150801bsrsharmaParticipantWhat is the Quid Pro Quo for illegals to vote? Plenty of Citizens don’t care to vote knowing full well they are selecting the national leaders. What does an illegal, who has no clue, probably doesn’t know the language of the ballot or instructions, get by wasting his/her time to engage in a completely meaningless ritual? Unless someone can show there is vote buying for cash/kind, these allegations are red herrings (and probably thinly veiled racism against Hispanic political activism). One can fully be opposed to illegal immigration without becoming an “illegal voting” alarmist.
February 9, 2008 at 6:07 PM #150875bsrsharmaParticipantWhat is the Quid Pro Quo for illegals to vote? Plenty of Citizens don’t care to vote knowing full well they are selecting the national leaders. What does an illegal, who has no clue, probably doesn’t know the language of the ballot or instructions, get by wasting his/her time to engage in a completely meaningless ritual? Unless someone can show there is vote buying for cash/kind, these allegations are red herrings (and probably thinly veiled racism against Hispanic political activism). One can fully be opposed to illegal immigration without becoming an “illegal voting” alarmist.
February 10, 2008 at 2:25 AM #150655boyle_heightsParticipantYou say you are not a racist but state: So whining may be slightly justified by some……..who are carrying 50,000 in school loans while their hispanic buddy has none……(FYI, I have no school loans).
Then you say you are not racist again then state: Hispanics are probably voting for Clinton because she wants to put a freeze on foreclosures and bail everyone out.
Sounds like a racist to me.
Latinos voted for Hillary because they know more about her than they know about Obama. Obama himself has stated that he reached out to the Latino community too late.
As for bailouts, who is it really helping? Latinos have one of the lowest home ownership rates among the different races. Who does it benefit by allowing Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac to purchase loans at 700K+? How many Latino families will benefit from that?
I am Latino. Graduated from USC. Voted for Obama.
Using your logic I should be able to whine. I had 50k in loans and you had none. It must mean you got government handouts.
February 10, 2008 at 2:25 AM #150914boyle_heightsParticipantYou say you are not a racist but state: So whining may be slightly justified by some……..who are carrying 50,000 in school loans while their hispanic buddy has none……(FYI, I have no school loans).
Then you say you are not racist again then state: Hispanics are probably voting for Clinton because she wants to put a freeze on foreclosures and bail everyone out.
Sounds like a racist to me.
Latinos voted for Hillary because they know more about her than they know about Obama. Obama himself has stated that he reached out to the Latino community too late.
As for bailouts, who is it really helping? Latinos have one of the lowest home ownership rates among the different races. Who does it benefit by allowing Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac to purchase loans at 700K+? How many Latino families will benefit from that?
I am Latino. Graduated from USC. Voted for Obama.
Using your logic I should be able to whine. I had 50k in loans and you had none. It must mean you got government handouts.
February 10, 2008 at 2:25 AM #150926boyle_heightsParticipantYou say you are not a racist but state: So whining may be slightly justified by some……..who are carrying 50,000 in school loans while their hispanic buddy has none……(FYI, I have no school loans).
Then you say you are not racist again then state: Hispanics are probably voting for Clinton because she wants to put a freeze on foreclosures and bail everyone out.
Sounds like a racist to me.
Latinos voted for Hillary because they know more about her than they know about Obama. Obama himself has stated that he reached out to the Latino community too late.
As for bailouts, who is it really helping? Latinos have one of the lowest home ownership rates among the different races. Who does it benefit by allowing Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac to purchase loans at 700K+? How many Latino families will benefit from that?
I am Latino. Graduated from USC. Voted for Obama.
Using your logic I should be able to whine. I had 50k in loans and you had none. It must mean you got government handouts.
February 10, 2008 at 2:25 AM #150942boyle_heightsParticipantYou say you are not a racist but state: So whining may be slightly justified by some……..who are carrying 50,000 in school loans while their hispanic buddy has none……(FYI, I have no school loans).
Then you say you are not racist again then state: Hispanics are probably voting for Clinton because she wants to put a freeze on foreclosures and bail everyone out.
Sounds like a racist to me.
Latinos voted for Hillary because they know more about her than they know about Obama. Obama himself has stated that he reached out to the Latino community too late.
As for bailouts, who is it really helping? Latinos have one of the lowest home ownership rates among the different races. Who does it benefit by allowing Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac to purchase loans at 700K+? How many Latino families will benefit from that?
I am Latino. Graduated from USC. Voted for Obama.
Using your logic I should be able to whine. I had 50k in loans and you had none. It must mean you got government handouts.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.