- This topic has 255 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by Ex-SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 10, 2008 at 8:13 PM #151585February 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #151255boyle_heightsParticipant
Nice one fat_lazy_union. haha.
February 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #151517boyle_heightsParticipantNice one fat_lazy_union. haha.
February 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #151524boyle_heightsParticipantNice one fat_lazy_union. haha.
February 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #151541boyle_heightsParticipantNice one fat_lazy_union. haha.
February 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #151615boyle_heightsParticipantNice one fat_lazy_union. haha.
February 10, 2008 at 10:26 PM #151295bsrsharmaParticipantVote based on what you think will benefit you, and be done with it.
Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
February 10, 2008 at 10:26 PM #151557bsrsharmaParticipantVote based on what you think will benefit you, and be done with it.
Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
February 10, 2008 at 10:26 PM #151564bsrsharmaParticipantVote based on what you think will benefit you, and be done with it.
Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
February 10, 2008 at 10:26 PM #151581bsrsharmaParticipantVote based on what you think will benefit you, and be done with it.
Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
February 10, 2008 at 10:26 PM #151655bsrsharmaParticipantVote based on what you think will benefit you, and be done with it.
Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
February 10, 2008 at 11:05 PM #151329CoronitaParticipant Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
Yes, this would be minimalist..But for some, motivating to be a "minimist" to effect change is better than being do-nothing-and-play-victim-ist. And yes, i feel sometimes you need to think about yourself first before you can take care of others.
For example: tax issues: If I give 30-40% of my income to say the under a robin-hood bailout plan, for example, I jeopardize my own family and self livelihood, not to mention, no one learns from this who gets bailed out. If I can decide keep and decide to down with the 30-40%, I could use it to start a company (for example), which if successful, would create jobs. Perhaps this is a very narrowminded and naive-thinking.Â
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 10, 2008 at 11:05 PM #151592CoronitaParticipant Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
Yes, this would be minimalist..But for some, motivating to be a "minimist" to effect change is better than being do-nothing-and-play-victim-ist. And yes, i feel sometimes you need to think about yourself first before you can take care of others.
For example: tax issues: If I give 30-40% of my income to say the under a robin-hood bailout plan, for example, I jeopardize my own family and self livelihood, not to mention, no one learns from this who gets bailed out. If I can decide keep and decide to down with the 30-40%, I could use it to start a company (for example), which if successful, would create jobs. Perhaps this is a very narrowminded and naive-thinking.Â
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 10, 2008 at 11:05 PM #151599CoronitaParticipant Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
Yes, this would be minimalist..But for some, motivating to be a "minimist" to effect change is better than being do-nothing-and-play-victim-ist. And yes, i feel sometimes you need to think about yourself first before you can take care of others.
For example: tax issues: If I give 30-40% of my income to say the under a robin-hood bailout plan, for example, I jeopardize my own family and self livelihood, not to mention, no one learns from this who gets bailed out. If I can decide keep and decide to down with the 30-40%, I could use it to start a company (for example), which if successful, would create jobs. Perhaps this is a very narrowminded and naive-thinking.Â
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
February 10, 2008 at 11:05 PM #151616CoronitaParticipant Hmm.. Isn't that a rather minimalist practice of good Citizenship? I am pretty sure most people won't benefit significantly differently, individually, based on who becomes the next President. But the overall direction of our Civilization can change dramatically – as the last 8 years have demonstrated forcefully. I think being a little more concerned about the future of Community/State/Nation is not entirely useless.
Yes, this would be minimalist..But for some, motivating to be a "minimist" to effect change is better than being do-nothing-and-play-victim-ist. And yes, i feel sometimes you need to think about yourself first before you can take care of others.
For example: tax issues: If I give 30-40% of my income to say the under a robin-hood bailout plan, for example, I jeopardize my own family and self livelihood, not to mention, no one learns from this who gets bailed out. If I can decide keep and decide to down with the 30-40%, I could use it to start a company (for example), which if successful, would create jobs. Perhaps this is a very narrowminded and naive-thinking.Â
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.