OT: we have great people running for office.

[paramount]

Nothing personally against Jerry Brown, but in a state of 30 million + couldn’t we come up with another candidate that had not already been governor?

[enron_by_the_sea]

Actually I agree with the original poster.

Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown are both good choices. I am pretty sure they are both honest, sincere and mean well.

Meg Whitman as a businesswomen turned a small but great startup company into a hugely successful world-renowned multi-billion business and made tons of employees and shareholders very happy in the process. She should be commended to put her money where the mouth is and at least try to do something for the state which made it happen.

Jerry Brown spent his whole life in public service. As far as I can tell, he appears to be one of the most honest, down to earth politician with considerable intellectual firepower.

How you vote should be dictated more by the policies you believe in. There should be no reason to doubt the sincerity of either of them.

I voted for Whitman mainly because I believe that we need to shrink the size and scope of state govt.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Actually I agree with the original poster.

Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown are both good choices. I am pretty sure they are both honest, sincere and mean well.

Meg Whitman as a businesswomen turned a small but great startup company into a hugely successful world-renowned multi-billion business and made tons of employees and shareholders very happy in the process. She should be commended to put her money where the mouth is and at least try to do something for the state which made it happen.

Jerry Brown spent his whole life in public service. As far as I can tell, he appears to be one of the most honest, down to earth politician with considerable intellectual firepower.

How you vote should be dictated more by the policies you believe in. There should be no reason to doubt the sincerity of either of them.

I voted for Whitman mainly because I believe that we need to shrink the size and scope of state govt.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Actually I agree with the original poster.

Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown are both good choices. I am pretty sure they are both honest, sincere and mean well.

Meg Whitman as a businesswomen turned a small but great startup company into a hugely successful world-renowned multi-billion business and made tons of employees and shareholders very happy in the process. She should be commended to put her money where the mouth is and at least try to do something for the state which made it happen.

Jerry Brown spent his whole life in public service. As far as I can tell, he appears to be one of the most honest, down to earth politician with considerable intellectual firepower.

How you vote should be dictated more by the policies you believe in. There should be no reason to doubt the sincerity of either of them.

I voted for Whitman mainly because I believe that we need to shrink the size and scope of state govt.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Actually I agree with the original poster.

Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown are both good choices. I am pretty sure they are both honest, sincere and mean well.

Meg Whitman as a businesswomen turned a small but great startup company into a hugely successful world-renowned multi-billion business and made tons of employees and shareholders very happy in the process. She should be commended to put her money where the mouth is and at least try to do something for the state which made it happen.

Jerry Brown spent his whole life in public service. As far as I can tell, he appears to be one of the most honest, down to earth politician with considerable intellectual firepower.

How you vote should be dictated more by the policies you believe in. There should be no reason to doubt the sincerity of either of them.

I voted for Whitman mainly because I believe that we need to shrink the size and scope of state govt.

[enron_by_the_sea]

Actually I agree with the original poster.

Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown are both good choices. I am pretty sure they are both honest, sincere and mean well.

Meg Whitman as a businesswomen turned a small but great startup company into a hugely successful world-renowned multi-billion business and made tons of employees and shareholders very happy in the process. She should be commended to put her money where the mouth is and at least try to do something for the state which made it happen.

Jerry Brown spent his whole life in public service. As far as I can tell, he appears to be one of the most honest, down to earth politician with considerable intellectual firepower.

How you vote should be dictated more by the policies you believe in. There should be no reason to doubt the sincerity of either of them.

I voted for Whitman mainly because I believe that we need to shrink the size and scope of state govt.

[waiting hawk]

[quote=threadkiller]Are you serious! This is one of the first times I’ve thought about not voting. At first I did like what Meg Whitman had to say, then I listened more. I don’t recall having any fond memories of Jerry and by the way he talks I’m sure he is suffering from brain dammage due to drug use probably. The props don’t really pull at my heart either. Although I don’t back prop D, I can’t say I’ll be upset if it passes either.[/quote]

I agree they both are horrible BUT no matter who gets in they have little power to make any real change. Checks and balances so until the masses wake up you could put the lord himself in that spot and he couldnt do much under the current law.

[waiting hawk]

[quote=threadkiller]Are you serious! This is one of the first times I’ve thought about not voting. At first I did like what Meg Whitman had to say, then I listened more. I don’t recall having any fond memories of Jerry and by the way he talks I’m sure he is suffering from brain dammage due to drug use probably. The props don’t really pull at my heart either. Although I don’t back prop D, I can’t say I’ll be upset if it passes either.[/quote]

I agree they both are horrible BUT no matter who gets in they have little power to make any real change. Checks and balances so until the masses wake up you could put the lord himself in that spot and he couldnt do much under the current law.

[waiting hawk]

[quote=threadkiller]Are you serious! This is one of the first times I’ve thought about not voting. At first I did like what Meg Whitman had to say, then I listened more. I don’t recall having any fond memories of Jerry and by the way he talks I’m sure he is suffering from brain dammage due to drug use probably. The props don’t really pull at my heart either. Although I don’t back prop D, I can’t say I’ll be upset if it passes either.[/quote]

I agree they both are horrible BUT no matter who gets in they have little power to make any real change. Checks and balances so until the masses wake up you could put the lord himself in that spot and he couldnt do much under the current law.

[waiting hawk]

[quote=threadkiller]Are you serious! This is one of the first times I’ve thought about not voting. At first I did like what Meg Whitman had to say, then I listened more. I don’t recall having any fond memories of Jerry and by the way he talks I’m sure he is suffering from brain dammage due to drug use probably. The props don’t really pull at my heart either. Although I don’t back prop D, I can’t say I’ll be upset if it passes either.[/quote]

I agree they both are horrible BUT no matter who gets in they have little power to make any real change. Checks and balances so until the masses wake up you could put the lord himself in that spot and he couldnt do much under the current law.

[waiting hawk]

[quote=threadkiller]Are you serious! This is one of the first times I’ve thought about not voting. At first I did like what Meg Whitman had to say, then I listened more. I don’t recall having any fond memories of Jerry and by the way he talks I’m sure he is suffering from brain dammage due to drug use probably. The props don’t really pull at my heart either. Although I don’t back prop D, I can’t say I’ll be upset if it passes either.[/quote]

I agree they both are horrible BUT no matter who gets in they have little power to make any real change. Checks and balances so until the masses wake up you could put the lord himself in that spot and he couldnt do much under the current law.

[ocrenter]

California has grown to the point that it is really unmanageable. regardless of who is the governor.

I say split it into three, it really does make more sense.

[ocrenter]

California has grown to the point that it is really unmanageable. regardless of who is the governor.

I say split it into three, it really does make more sense.

[ocrenter]

California has grown to the point that it is really unmanageable. regardless of who is the governor.

I say split it into three, it really does make more sense.

[ocrenter]

California has grown to the point that it is really unmanageable. regardless of who is the governor.

I say split it into three, it really does make more sense.

[Author]

Posts