- This topic has 75 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 31, 2010 at 8:05 AM #625795October 31, 2010 at 3:34 PM #624734
Ren
ParticipantI was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
This is going to sound petty, but I honestly believe she got lucky with ebay. Like Myspace and Facebook, it was an original idea that filled a big need, and would have gotten huge with any trained business person at the helm, in spite of itself – ebay has always had a terrible interface, completely unresponsive customer service (you’re lucky to get a reply at all, let alone a meaningful answer), and bugs that any other company would find unacceptable just become a part of their “quirkiness” and never get fixed (for example, their messaging system works about a quarter of the time).
A non-democrat CA governor is impotent, so your vote against the status quo doesn’t really matter, although Brown being in office will probably hasten the end of days. I’ll probably vote for the Libertarian candidate, just to help give that party some recognition. He would be just as ineffective in office as Whitman.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
Viva La Revolución!
October 31, 2010 at 3:34 PM #624817ParticipantI was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
This is going to sound petty, but I honestly believe she got lucky with ebay. Like Myspace and Facebook, it was an original idea that filled a big need, and would have gotten huge with any trained business person at the helm, in spite of itself – ebay has always had a terrible interface, completely unresponsive customer service (you’re lucky to get a reply at all, let alone a meaningful answer), and bugs that any other company would find unacceptable just become a part of their “quirkiness” and never get fixed (for example, their messaging system works about a quarter of the time).
A non-democrat CA governor is impotent, so your vote against the status quo doesn’t really matter, although Brown being in office will probably hasten the end of days. I’ll probably vote for the Libertarian candidate, just to help give that party some recognition. He would be just as ineffective in office as Whitman.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
Viva La Revolución!
October 31, 2010 at 3:34 PM #625374ParticipantI was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
This is going to sound petty, but I honestly believe she got lucky with ebay. Like Myspace and Facebook, it was an original idea that filled a big need, and would have gotten huge with any trained business person at the helm, in spite of itself – ebay has always had a terrible interface, completely unresponsive customer service (you’re lucky to get a reply at all, let alone a meaningful answer), and bugs that any other company would find unacceptable just become a part of their “quirkiness” and never get fixed (for example, their messaging system works about a quarter of the time).
A non-democrat CA governor is impotent, so your vote against the status quo doesn’t really matter, although Brown being in office will probably hasten the end of days. I’ll probably vote for the Libertarian candidate, just to help give that party some recognition. He would be just as ineffective in office as Whitman.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
Viva La Revolución!
October 31, 2010 at 3:34 PM #625497ParticipantI was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
This is going to sound petty, but I honestly believe she got lucky with ebay. Like Myspace and Facebook, it was an original idea that filled a big need, and would have gotten huge with any trained business person at the helm, in spite of itself – ebay has always had a terrible interface, completely unresponsive customer service (you’re lucky to get a reply at all, let alone a meaningful answer), and bugs that any other company would find unacceptable just become a part of their “quirkiness” and never get fixed (for example, their messaging system works about a quarter of the time).
A non-democrat CA governor is impotent, so your vote against the status quo doesn’t really matter, although Brown being in office will probably hasten the end of days. I’ll probably vote for the Libertarian candidate, just to help give that party some recognition. He would be just as ineffective in office as Whitman.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
Viva La Revolución!
October 31, 2010 at 3:34 PM #625810ParticipantI was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
This is going to sound petty, but I honestly believe she got lucky with ebay. Like Myspace and Facebook, it was an original idea that filled a big need, and would have gotten huge with any trained business person at the helm, in spite of itself – ebay has always had a terrible interface, completely unresponsive customer service (you’re lucky to get a reply at all, let alone a meaningful answer), and bugs that any other company would find unacceptable just become a part of their “quirkiness” and never get fixed (for example, their messaging system works about a quarter of the time).
A non-democrat CA governor is impotent, so your vote against the status quo doesn’t really matter, although Brown being in office will probably hasten the end of days. I’ll probably vote for the Libertarian candidate, just to help give that party some recognition. He would be just as ineffective in office as Whitman.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
Viva La Revolución!
October 31, 2010 at 5:58 PM #624819patb
Participant[quote=Ren]I was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
[/quote]
Whitman can’t be very smart, if she were, she could have invested $140Million into owning various candidates.
She’s running for vanity reasons, same reason Hillary Clinton ran.
October 31, 2010 at 5:58 PM #624902Participant[quote=Ren]I was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
[/quote]
Whitman can’t be very smart, if she were, she could have invested $140Million into owning various candidates.
She’s running for vanity reasons, same reason Hillary Clinton ran.
October 31, 2010 at 5:58 PM #625456Participant[quote=Ren]I was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
[/quote]
Whitman can’t be very smart, if she were, she could have invested $140Million into owning various candidates.
She’s running for vanity reasons, same reason Hillary Clinton ran.
October 31, 2010 at 5:58 PM #625581Participant[quote=Ren]I was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
[/quote]
Whitman can’t be very smart, if she were, she could have invested $140Million into owning various candidates.
She’s running for vanity reasons, same reason Hillary Clinton ran.
October 31, 2010 at 5:58 PM #625893Participant[quote=Ren]I was originally going to vote for Meg Whitman just because I felt she was the lesser of two evils, but now I think she’s very nearly as bad as Brown.
The ONLY solution is bankruptcy, invalidating public employee pension contracts, and changing the legislature to part time.
[/quote]
Whitman can’t be very smart, if she were, she could have invested $140Million into owning various candidates.
She’s running for vanity reasons, same reason Hillary Clinton ran.
November 1, 2010 at 6:05 AM #624950scaredyclassic
Participantwhat else could she have spent 140 million on that would ahve been as fun as a raffle ticket for governor?
November 1, 2010 at 6:05 AM #625032Participantwhat else could she have spent 140 million on that would ahve been as fun as a raffle ticket for governor?
November 1, 2010 at 6:05 AM #625585Participantwhat else could she have spent 140 million on that would ahve been as fun as a raffle ticket for governor?
November 1, 2010 at 6:05 AM #625709Participantwhat else could she have spent 140 million on that would ahve been as fun as a raffle ticket for governor?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.