- This topic has 125 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by Veritas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 12, 2008 at 3:41 PM #269854September 12, 2008 at 4:15 PM #269546JPJonesParticipant
So what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
September 12, 2008 at 4:15 PM #269777JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
September 12, 2008 at 4:15 PM #269785JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
September 12, 2008 at 4:15 PM #269832JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
September 12, 2008 at 4:15 PM #269859JPJonesParticipantSo what you’re saying is that it’s not OK to teach our children to defend themselves against sexual predators? Did you even bother to read the link in my second post? Here is an excerpt that qualifies the concept of age appropriate sex ed for kindergarten:
Bill SB 99 of the 2003 Illinois Legislative session explicitly states, “Course material and instruction shall teach pupils to not make unwanted physical and verbal sexual advances and how to say no to unwanted sexual advances and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance.”
Again, Romney used a blanket label for the subject that does not work. In my opinion, education is the best defense we can give our children, regardless of age.
September 12, 2008 at 7:00 PM #269582VeritasParticipantdelete
September 12, 2008 at 7:00 PM #269813VeritasParticipantdelete
September 12, 2008 at 7:00 PM #269820VeritasParticipantdelete
September 12, 2008 at 7:00 PM #269866VeritasParticipantdelete
September 12, 2008 at 7:00 PM #269894VeritasParticipantdelete
September 13, 2008 at 9:03 AM #269651zkParticipantJPJones, you had it right when you said that “there is too much spin and hypocrisy on either side for most of the commentaries to be worth a damn.” Your reasoned responses to the spin being applied by the posters on this topic has been met with more spin and more ignorance of (or, worse yet, disregard for) the facts.
Very few of the posters care enough about the issues and the facts to change their mind about anything given the truth. All they want is to spout some half (at best) true spin for their guy and shout you down when you speak truth.
September 13, 2008 at 9:03 AM #269883zkParticipantJPJones, you had it right when you said that “there is too much spin and hypocrisy on either side for most of the commentaries to be worth a damn.” Your reasoned responses to the spin being applied by the posters on this topic has been met with more spin and more ignorance of (or, worse yet, disregard for) the facts.
Very few of the posters care enough about the issues and the facts to change their mind about anything given the truth. All they want is to spout some half (at best) true spin for their guy and shout you down when you speak truth.
September 13, 2008 at 9:03 AM #269890zkParticipantJPJones, you had it right when you said that “there is too much spin and hypocrisy on either side for most of the commentaries to be worth a damn.” Your reasoned responses to the spin being applied by the posters on this topic has been met with more spin and more ignorance of (or, worse yet, disregard for) the facts.
Very few of the posters care enough about the issues and the facts to change their mind about anything given the truth. All they want is to spout some half (at best) true spin for their guy and shout you down when you speak truth.
September 13, 2008 at 9:03 AM #269937zkParticipantJPJones, you had it right when you said that “there is too much spin and hypocrisy on either side for most of the commentaries to be worth a damn.” Your reasoned responses to the spin being applied by the posters on this topic has been met with more spin and more ignorance of (or, worse yet, disregard for) the facts.
Very few of the posters care enough about the issues and the facts to change their mind about anything given the truth. All they want is to spout some half (at best) true spin for their guy and shout you down when you speak truth.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.