- This topic has 125 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by Veritas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 14, 2008 at 2:21 PM #270399September 15, 2008 at 9:56 AM #270426BaneParticipant
If all of you are saying Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners, than McCain being against this means that McCain supports pedophile rights.
Both arguments are ridiculous.
I personally want my 4 year old to know when he is being touched inappropriately so he can tell me, a teacher, or a police officer. It is pretty easy to show them where people should not be touching, without showing them sex. Really, what is wrong with some people?
September 15, 2008 at 9:56 AM #270660BaneParticipantIf all of you are saying Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners, than McCain being against this means that McCain supports pedophile rights.
Both arguments are ridiculous.
I personally want my 4 year old to know when he is being touched inappropriately so he can tell me, a teacher, or a police officer. It is pretty easy to show them where people should not be touching, without showing them sex. Really, what is wrong with some people?
September 15, 2008 at 9:56 AM #270663BaneParticipantIf all of you are saying Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners, than McCain being against this means that McCain supports pedophile rights.
Both arguments are ridiculous.
I personally want my 4 year old to know when he is being touched inappropriately so he can tell me, a teacher, or a police officer. It is pretty easy to show them where people should not be touching, without showing them sex. Really, what is wrong with some people?
September 15, 2008 at 9:56 AM #270712BaneParticipantIf all of you are saying Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners, than McCain being against this means that McCain supports pedophile rights.
Both arguments are ridiculous.
I personally want my 4 year old to know when he is being touched inappropriately so he can tell me, a teacher, or a police officer. It is pretty easy to show them where people should not be touching, without showing them sex. Really, what is wrong with some people?
September 15, 2008 at 9:56 AM #270739BaneParticipantIf all of you are saying Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners, than McCain being against this means that McCain supports pedophile rights.
Both arguments are ridiculous.
I personally want my 4 year old to know when he is being touched inappropriately so he can tell me, a teacher, or a police officer. It is pretty easy to show them where people should not be touching, without showing them sex. Really, what is wrong with some people?
September 15, 2008 at 10:24 AM #270466stockstradrParticipantAll this discussion is kinda a moot point, because McCain is doomed to lose. You wanna debate if the sun will rise tomorrow? That is as equally certain an event as McCain losing this election. If anyone wanted to bet me $1,000 that McCain will win, I’d accept and bet he’ll lose, even taking the bet at 2:1 odds. I’m that sure McCain will lose.
September 15, 2008 at 10:24 AM #270701stockstradrParticipantAll this discussion is kinda a moot point, because McCain is doomed to lose. You wanna debate if the sun will rise tomorrow? That is as equally certain an event as McCain losing this election. If anyone wanted to bet me $1,000 that McCain will win, I’d accept and bet he’ll lose, even taking the bet at 2:1 odds. I’m that sure McCain will lose.
September 15, 2008 at 10:24 AM #270704stockstradrParticipantAll this discussion is kinda a moot point, because McCain is doomed to lose. You wanna debate if the sun will rise tomorrow? That is as equally certain an event as McCain losing this election. If anyone wanted to bet me $1,000 that McCain will win, I’d accept and bet he’ll lose, even taking the bet at 2:1 odds. I’m that sure McCain will lose.
September 15, 2008 at 10:24 AM #270754stockstradrParticipantAll this discussion is kinda a moot point, because McCain is doomed to lose. You wanna debate if the sun will rise tomorrow? That is as equally certain an event as McCain losing this election. If anyone wanted to bet me $1,000 that McCain will win, I’d accept and bet he’ll lose, even taking the bet at 2:1 odds. I’m that sure McCain will lose.
September 15, 2008 at 10:24 AM #270779stockstradrParticipantAll this discussion is kinda a moot point, because McCain is doomed to lose. You wanna debate if the sun will rise tomorrow? That is as equally certain an event as McCain losing this election. If anyone wanted to bet me $1,000 that McCain will win, I’d accept and bet he’ll lose, even taking the bet at 2:1 odds. I’m that sure McCain will lose.
September 21, 2008 at 5:17 PM #273660bsrsharmaParticipantMcCain and the POW Cover-up
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in VietnamJohn McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn’t return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books………
September 21, 2008 at 5:17 PM #273906bsrsharmaParticipantMcCain and the POW Cover-up
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in VietnamJohn McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn’t return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books………
September 21, 2008 at 5:17 PM #273911bsrsharmaParticipantMcCain and the POW Cover-up
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in VietnamJohn McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn’t return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books………
September 21, 2008 at 5:17 PM #273955bsrsharmaParticipantMcCain and the POW Cover-up
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in VietnamJohn McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn’t return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books………
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.