ot: Bin laden is dead

[Arraya]

[quote=afx114]Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.[/quote]

Right, because conspiracies never happen. I mean we would never make up stories about yellow cake uranium to invade and country that had nothing to do with 911. No, no, no… No sir, never any public manipulation when it comes to war… Not when my team is in

I love how the supercritical of bush, left come out like zombies and accept whatever their “team” has to say. It’s pretty pathetic really.

The “war on terror” is 50% theater.

http://www.chris-floyd.com/

; but the post linked above serves as an almost perfect example of the moral schizophrenia that has gripped the progressive movement since the advent of Obama.

Obama has killed hundreds of innocent people. Hundreds of innocent people. Little children, women, old folks, young marrieds, fathers, mothers, teenagers – he has killed them in their own homes, in the streets of their villages, in their cars, at their weddings and funerals and birthday parties and family gatherings, raining down missiles, without warning, with no way to escape, no defense, killed them, the babies, the children, the old, the sick, ripped their bodies to shreds, buried them under rubble, tore off their heads, set them on fire to die in the purest agony. She knows this. She decries this. She believes it is wrong. Yet the general thrust of her widely read blog is that this man who does these things, who commits these horrors, who claims these murderous, tyrannous powers, should, at all costs, be retained in power so that he can carry on doing these things which sicken and horrify her.

But he better not release a photo, because it might offend some people.

[Aecetia]

“Moments before he died, Osama bin Laden may have gotten a brief glimpse of what was headed his way – as a bullet whizzed by his head.”

http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2011/05/05/saxby-chambliss-first-shot-at-osama-bin-laden-was-a-miss/

[Aecetia]

“Moments before he died, Osama bin Laden may have gotten a brief glimpse of what was headed his way – as a bullet whizzed by his head.”

http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2011/05/05/saxby-chambliss-first-shot-at-osama-bin-laden-was-a-miss/

[Aecetia]

“Moments before he died, Osama bin Laden may have gotten a brief glimpse of what was headed his way – as a bullet whizzed by his head.”

http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2011/05/05/saxby-chambliss-first-shot-at-osama-bin-laden-was-a-miss/

[Aecetia]

“Moments before he died, Osama bin Laden may have gotten a brief glimpse of what was headed his way – as a bullet whizzed by his head.”

http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2011/05/05/saxby-chambliss-first-shot-at-osama-bin-laden-was-a-miss/

[Aecetia]

“Moments before he died, Osama bin Laden may have gotten a brief glimpse of what was headed his way – as a bullet whizzed by his head.”

http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2011/05/05/saxby-chambliss-first-shot-at-osama-bin-laden-was-a-miss/

[Arraya]

It interesting how the media tries to promote the narrative as advanced by the United States Government. It very much the same tactics used when people questioned the presence of WMDs in Iraq.

They appear to be shocked when a person they interview suggests this all a psy-ops.

As in “what? Are you serious? You really believe this was fabricated?” They then totally ignore the lack of evidence and just persist in this vein.

“You really can not be serious!? Can you repeat what you said for the listening audience?” It does not matter whether the person being interviewed lays out his or her case such as.

Using the example of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch. Mentioning the lies told about the WMDs. Pointing out that the CIA admitted openly it was fabricating Bin Laden tapes. Mentioning all of the press reports of Bin Laden having died years ago. Pointing out how the story continually changed.

All of this is talked over and ignored and the person is more or less mocked as some sort of loony for even suggesting this all faked.

The viewing audience do not see themselves as a loony so they chuckle along with the interviewer.

To add to this farce the US Government now claims they had the home in question under surveillance by the CIA for months yet in all of that time did not take a single picture of Osama Bin Laden entering or leaving.

They claim there was none which begs the question, how did they conclude he was in there?

[Arraya]

It interesting how the media tries to promote the narrative as advanced by the United States Government. It very much the same tactics used when people questioned the presence of WMDs in Iraq.

They appear to be shocked when a person they interview suggests this all a psy-ops.

As in “what? Are you serious? You really believe this was fabricated?” They then totally ignore the lack of evidence and just persist in this vein.

“You really can not be serious!? Can you repeat what you said for the listening audience?” It does not matter whether the person being interviewed lays out his or her case such as.

Using the example of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch. Mentioning the lies told about the WMDs. Pointing out that the CIA admitted openly it was fabricating Bin Laden tapes. Mentioning all of the press reports of Bin Laden having died years ago. Pointing out how the story continually changed.

All of this is talked over and ignored and the person is more or less mocked as some sort of loony for even suggesting this all faked.

The viewing audience do not see themselves as a loony so they chuckle along with the interviewer.

To add to this farce the US Government now claims they had the home in question under surveillance by the CIA for months yet in all of that time did not take a single picture of Osama Bin Laden entering or leaving.

They claim there was none which begs the question, how did they conclude he was in there?

[Arraya]

It interesting how the media tries to promote the narrative as advanced by the United States Government. It very much the same tactics used when people questioned the presence of WMDs in Iraq.

They appear to be shocked when a person they interview suggests this all a psy-ops.

As in “what? Are you serious? You really believe this was fabricated?” They then totally ignore the lack of evidence and just persist in this vein.

“You really can not be serious!? Can you repeat what you said for the listening audience?” It does not matter whether the person being interviewed lays out his or her case such as.

Using the example of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch. Mentioning the lies told about the WMDs. Pointing out that the CIA admitted openly it was fabricating Bin Laden tapes. Mentioning all of the press reports of Bin Laden having died years ago. Pointing out how the story continually changed.

All of this is talked over and ignored and the person is more or less mocked as some sort of loony for even suggesting this all faked.

The viewing audience do not see themselves as a loony so they chuckle along with the interviewer.

To add to this farce the US Government now claims they had the home in question under surveillance by the CIA for months yet in all of that time did not take a single picture of Osama Bin Laden entering or leaving.

They claim there was none which begs the question, how did they conclude he was in there?

[Arraya]

It interesting how the media tries to promote the narrative as advanced by the United States Government. It very much the same tactics used when people questioned the presence of WMDs in Iraq.

They appear to be shocked when a person they interview suggests this all a psy-ops.

As in “what? Are you serious? You really believe this was fabricated?” They then totally ignore the lack of evidence and just persist in this vein.

“You really can not be serious!? Can you repeat what you said for the listening audience?” It does not matter whether the person being interviewed lays out his or her case such as.

Using the example of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch. Mentioning the lies told about the WMDs. Pointing out that the CIA admitted openly it was fabricating Bin Laden tapes. Mentioning all of the press reports of Bin Laden having died years ago. Pointing out how the story continually changed.

All of this is talked over and ignored and the person is more or less mocked as some sort of loony for even suggesting this all faked.

The viewing audience do not see themselves as a loony so they chuckle along with the interviewer.

To add to this farce the US Government now claims they had the home in question under surveillance by the CIA for months yet in all of that time did not take a single picture of Osama Bin Laden entering or leaving.

They claim there was none which begs the question, how did they conclude he was in there?

[Arraya]

It interesting how the media tries to promote the narrative as advanced by the United States Government. It very much the same tactics used when people questioned the presence of WMDs in Iraq.

They appear to be shocked when a person they interview suggests this all a psy-ops.

As in “what? Are you serious? You really believe this was fabricated?” They then totally ignore the lack of evidence and just persist in this vein.

“You really can not be serious!? Can you repeat what you said for the listening audience?” It does not matter whether the person being interviewed lays out his or her case such as.

Using the example of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch. Mentioning the lies told about the WMDs. Pointing out that the CIA admitted openly it was fabricating Bin Laden tapes. Mentioning all of the press reports of Bin Laden having died years ago. Pointing out how the story continually changed.

All of this is talked over and ignored and the person is more or less mocked as some sort of loony for even suggesting this all faked.

The viewing audience do not see themselves as a loony so they chuckle along with the interviewer.

To add to this farce the US Government now claims they had the home in question under surveillance by the CIA for months yet in all of that time did not take a single picture of Osama Bin Laden entering or leaving.

They claim there was none which begs the question, how did they conclude he was in there?

[scaredyclassic]

I think there’s around a 25 perc. Chance OBL was killed in the recent raid. Maybe a little higher.

[scaredyclassic]

I think there’s around a 25 perc. Chance OBL was killed in the recent raid. Maybe a little higher.

[scaredyclassic]

I think there’s around a 25 perc. Chance OBL was killed in the recent raid. Maybe a little higher.

[scaredyclassic]

I think there’s around a 25 perc. Chance OBL was killed in the recent raid. Maybe a little higher.

[Author]

Posts