ot: Bin laden is dead

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=CognitiveDissonance]Tonight, Chris Mathews was still pointing at the Situation Room photo as evidence that our fine leaders were morally troubled by watching Bin Laden get killed, though he apparently hasn’t heard that the video feed blacked out for 25 minutes, so who knows what they were watching?[/quote]

Arraya?
Why are you going by cognitive dissonance now?

[Arraya]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

Arraya?
Why are you going by cognitive dissonance now?[/quote]

Oh, I just thought it was time for a change.

Now to return to the Obama Bin Found show:

So, an unarmed old man on dialysis who in his previous alleged videos was nearly incapable of movement “threatened” a team of heavily armed SEALS trained in hand to hand combat and wearing body armor, and so they “had to shoot” an intelligence asset of incalculable value fatally instead of shooting him non-fatally. Then quickly disposed of his body at sea. Is that about right?

Of course, Osama was a CIA asset up to about 1991, has most likely been trained and actually shared the same bank(BCCI) as the CIA.

http://kasamaproject.org/2011/05/07/osama-bin-laden-state-assassination-without-trial/

By Noam Chomsky

It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law.

There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects.”

Alleged responsibility

In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have.

Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

[Arraya]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

Arraya?
Why are you going by cognitive dissonance now?[/quote]

Oh, I just thought it was time for a change.

Now to return to the Obama Bin Found show:

So, an unarmed old man on dialysis who in his previous alleged videos was nearly incapable of movement “threatened” a team of heavily armed SEALS trained in hand to hand combat and wearing body armor, and so they “had to shoot” an intelligence asset of incalculable value fatally instead of shooting him non-fatally. Then quickly disposed of his body at sea. Is that about right?

Of course, Osama was a CIA asset up to about 1991, has most likely been trained and actually shared the same bank(BCCI) as the CIA.

http://kasamaproject.org/2011/05/07/osama-bin-laden-state-assassination-without-trial/

By Noam Chomsky

It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law.

There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects.”

Alleged responsibility

In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have.

Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

[Arraya]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

Arraya?
Why are you going by cognitive dissonance now?[/quote]

Oh, I just thought it was time for a change.

Now to return to the Obama Bin Found show:

So, an unarmed old man on dialysis who in his previous alleged videos was nearly incapable of movement “threatened” a team of heavily armed SEALS trained in hand to hand combat and wearing body armor, and so they “had to shoot” an intelligence asset of incalculable value fatally instead of shooting him non-fatally. Then quickly disposed of his body at sea. Is that about right?

Of course, Osama was a CIA asset up to about 1991, has most likely been trained and actually shared the same bank(BCCI) as the CIA.

http://kasamaproject.org/2011/05/07/osama-bin-laden-state-assassination-without-trial/

By Noam Chomsky

It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law.

There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects.”

Alleged responsibility

In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have.

Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

[Arraya]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

Arraya?
Why are you going by cognitive dissonance now?[/quote]

Oh, I just thought it was time for a change.

Now to return to the Obama Bin Found show:

So, an unarmed old man on dialysis who in his previous alleged videos was nearly incapable of movement “threatened” a team of heavily armed SEALS trained in hand to hand combat and wearing body armor, and so they “had to shoot” an intelligence asset of incalculable value fatally instead of shooting him non-fatally. Then quickly disposed of his body at sea. Is that about right?

Of course, Osama was a CIA asset up to about 1991, has most likely been trained and actually shared the same bank(BCCI) as the CIA.

http://kasamaproject.org/2011/05/07/osama-bin-laden-state-assassination-without-trial/

By Noam Chomsky

It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law.

There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects.”

Alleged responsibility

In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have.

Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

[Arraya]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

Arraya?
Why are you going by cognitive dissonance now?[/quote]

Oh, I just thought it was time for a change.

Now to return to the Obama Bin Found show:

So, an unarmed old man on dialysis who in his previous alleged videos was nearly incapable of movement “threatened” a team of heavily armed SEALS trained in hand to hand combat and wearing body armor, and so they “had to shoot” an intelligence asset of incalculable value fatally instead of shooting him non-fatally. Then quickly disposed of his body at sea. Is that about right?

Of course, Osama was a CIA asset up to about 1991, has most likely been trained and actually shared the same bank(BCCI) as the CIA.

http://kasamaproject.org/2011/05/07/osama-bin-laden-state-assassination-without-trial/

By Noam Chomsky

It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law.

There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them. In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I stress “suspects.”

Alleged responsibility

In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany. What they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban (how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have.

Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

Nothing serious has been provided since. There is much talk of bin Laden’s “confession,” but that is rather like my confession that I won the Boston Marathon. He boasted of what he regarded as a great achievement.

[afx114]

Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.

[afx114]

Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.

[afx114]

Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.

[afx114]

Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.

[afx114]

Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.

[Arraya]

[quote=afx114]Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.[/quote]

Right, because conspiracies never happen. I mean we would never make up stories about yellow cake uranium to invade and country that had nothing to do with 911. No, no, no… No sir, never any public manipulation when it comes to war… Not when my team is in

I love how the supercritical of bush, left come out like zombies and accept whatever their “team” has to say. It’s pretty pathetic really.

The “war on terror” is 50% theater.

HOME

; but the post linked above serves as an almost perfect example of the moral schizophrenia that has gripped the progressive movement since the advent of Obama.

Obama has killed hundreds of innocent people. Hundreds of innocent people. Little children, women, old folks, young marrieds, fathers, mothers, teenagers – he has killed them in their own homes, in the streets of their villages, in their cars, at their weddings and funerals and birthday parties and family gatherings, raining down missiles, without warning, with no way to escape, no defense, killed them, the babies, the children, the old, the sick, ripped their bodies to shreds, buried them under rubble, tore off their heads, set them on fire to die in the purest agony. She knows this. She decries this. She believes it is wrong. Yet the general thrust of her widely read blog is that this man who does these things, who commits these horrors, who claims these murderous, tyrannous powers, should, at all costs, be retained in power so that he can carry on doing these things which sicken and horrify her.

But he better not release a photo, because it might offend some people.

[Arraya]

[quote=afx114]Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.[/quote]

Right, because conspiracies never happen. I mean we would never make up stories about yellow cake uranium to invade and country that had nothing to do with 911. No, no, no… No sir, never any public manipulation when it comes to war… Not when my team is in

I love how the supercritical of bush, left come out like zombies and accept whatever their “team” has to say. It’s pretty pathetic really.

The “war on terror” is 50% theater.

HOME

; but the post linked above serves as an almost perfect example of the moral schizophrenia that has gripped the progressive movement since the advent of Obama.

Obama has killed hundreds of innocent people. Hundreds of innocent people. Little children, women, old folks, young marrieds, fathers, mothers, teenagers – he has killed them in their own homes, in the streets of their villages, in their cars, at their weddings and funerals and birthday parties and family gatherings, raining down missiles, without warning, with no way to escape, no defense, killed them, the babies, the children, the old, the sick, ripped their bodies to shreds, buried them under rubble, tore off their heads, set them on fire to die in the purest agony. She knows this. She decries this. She believes it is wrong. Yet the general thrust of her widely read blog is that this man who does these things, who commits these horrors, who claims these murderous, tyrannous powers, should, at all costs, be retained in power so that he can carry on doing these things which sicken and horrify her.

But he better not release a photo, because it might offend some people.

[Arraya]

[quote=afx114]Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.[/quote]

Right, because conspiracies never happen. I mean we would never make up stories about yellow cake uranium to invade and country that had nothing to do with 911. No, no, no… No sir, never any public manipulation when it comes to war… Not when my team is in

I love how the supercritical of bush, left come out like zombies and accept whatever their “team” has to say. It’s pretty pathetic really.

The “war on terror” is 50% theater.

HOME

; but the post linked above serves as an almost perfect example of the moral schizophrenia that has gripped the progressive movement since the advent of Obama.

Obama has killed hundreds of innocent people. Hundreds of innocent people. Little children, women, old folks, young marrieds, fathers, mothers, teenagers – he has killed them in their own homes, in the streets of their villages, in their cars, at their weddings and funerals and birthday parties and family gatherings, raining down missiles, without warning, with no way to escape, no defense, killed them, the babies, the children, the old, the sick, ripped their bodies to shreds, buried them under rubble, tore off their heads, set them on fire to die in the purest agony. She knows this. She decries this. She believes it is wrong. Yet the general thrust of her widely read blog is that this man who does these things, who commits these horrors, who claims these murderous, tyrannous powers, should, at all costs, be retained in power so that he can carry on doing these things which sicken and horrify her.

But he better not release a photo, because it might offend some people.

[Arraya]

[quote=afx114]Man, Obama needs to just come out and Buzz Aldrin all of these conspiracy fools.[/quote]

Right, because conspiracies never happen. I mean we would never make up stories about yellow cake uranium to invade and country that had nothing to do with 911. No, no, no… No sir, never any public manipulation when it comes to war… Not when my team is in

I love how the supercritical of bush, left come out like zombies and accept whatever their “team” has to say. It’s pretty pathetic really.

The “war on terror” is 50% theater.

HOME

; but the post linked above serves as an almost perfect example of the moral schizophrenia that has gripped the progressive movement since the advent of Obama.

Obama has killed hundreds of innocent people. Hundreds of innocent people. Little children, women, old folks, young marrieds, fathers, mothers, teenagers – he has killed them in their own homes, in the streets of their villages, in their cars, at their weddings and funerals and birthday parties and family gatherings, raining down missiles, without warning, with no way to escape, no defense, killed them, the babies, the children, the old, the sick, ripped their bodies to shreds, buried them under rubble, tore off their heads, set them on fire to die in the purest agony. She knows this. She decries this. She believes it is wrong. Yet the general thrust of her widely read blog is that this man who does these things, who commits these horrors, who claims these murderous, tyrannous powers, should, at all costs, be retained in power so that he can carry on doing these things which sicken and horrify her.

But he better not release a photo, because it might offend some people.

[Author]

Posts