- This topic has 215 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 14, 2009 at 9:42 AM #381240April 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM #380619jpinpbParticipant
One other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor.
April 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM #380892jpinpbParticipantOne other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor.
April 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM #381080jpinpbParticipantOne other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor.
April 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM #381128jpinpbParticipantOne other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor.
April 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM #381255jpinpbParticipantOne other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor.
April 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM #380639SDEngineerParticipant[quote=flu]
Not exactly. Read the other part of about mini cars crashing into stationary objects. Smaller car => less energy absorption.
heh heh
[/quote]Not exactly x2. p=mv. A smaller car, being lighter, has much less momentum than a larger, heavier car, which means the collision energy with a stationary object is much lower, hence, they don’t need to absorb as much energy to provide driver protection in a collision. It doesn’t completely offset, but it’s not as cut and dried as you make it seem here.
It’s when you get into collisions with two moving objects that relative mass really puts the small car at a disadvantage.
April 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM #380912SDEngineerParticipant[quote=flu]
Not exactly. Read the other part of about mini cars crashing into stationary objects. Smaller car => less energy absorption.
heh heh
[/quote]Not exactly x2. p=mv. A smaller car, being lighter, has much less momentum than a larger, heavier car, which means the collision energy with a stationary object is much lower, hence, they don’t need to absorb as much energy to provide driver protection in a collision. It doesn’t completely offset, but it’s not as cut and dried as you make it seem here.
It’s when you get into collisions with two moving objects that relative mass really puts the small car at a disadvantage.
April 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM #381100SDEngineerParticipant[quote=flu]
Not exactly. Read the other part of about mini cars crashing into stationary objects. Smaller car => less energy absorption.
heh heh
[/quote]Not exactly x2. p=mv. A smaller car, being lighter, has much less momentum than a larger, heavier car, which means the collision energy with a stationary object is much lower, hence, they don’t need to absorb as much energy to provide driver protection in a collision. It doesn’t completely offset, but it’s not as cut and dried as you make it seem here.
It’s when you get into collisions with two moving objects that relative mass really puts the small car at a disadvantage.
April 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM #381148SDEngineerParticipant[quote=flu]
Not exactly. Read the other part of about mini cars crashing into stationary objects. Smaller car => less energy absorption.
heh heh
[/quote]Not exactly x2. p=mv. A smaller car, being lighter, has much less momentum than a larger, heavier car, which means the collision energy with a stationary object is much lower, hence, they don’t need to absorb as much energy to provide driver protection in a collision. It doesn’t completely offset, but it’s not as cut and dried as you make it seem here.
It’s when you get into collisions with two moving objects that relative mass really puts the small car at a disadvantage.
April 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM #381275SDEngineerParticipant[quote=flu]
Not exactly. Read the other part of about mini cars crashing into stationary objects. Smaller car => less energy absorption.
heh heh
[/quote]Not exactly x2. p=mv. A smaller car, being lighter, has much less momentum than a larger, heavier car, which means the collision energy with a stationary object is much lower, hence, they don’t need to absorb as much energy to provide driver protection in a collision. It doesn’t completely offset, but it’s not as cut and dried as you make it seem here.
It’s when you get into collisions with two moving objects that relative mass really puts the small car at a disadvantage.
April 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM #380659anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]One other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor. [/quote]
One simple fix for that would be to lower the SUV/CUV so the center of gravity would the similar to a car. Once again, physics is your friend.Like FLU said, safety and mpg are two different issue. You don’t have to sacrifice mpg for a bigger car. If you get those big SUV/CUV with a small I4 engine, your mpg will be pretty decent too. It doesn’t matter how safe you think you are, if the other guy is not safe, he/she can hit you even if you don’t want them to. That’s why I totally agree with FLU that if we just raise the standard for people to get driver license, that would be the best way to reduce accident.
April 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM #380932anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]One other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor. [/quote]
One simple fix for that would be to lower the SUV/CUV so the center of gravity would the similar to a car. Once again, physics is your friend.Like FLU said, safety and mpg are two different issue. You don’t have to sacrifice mpg for a bigger car. If you get those big SUV/CUV with a small I4 engine, your mpg will be pretty decent too. It doesn’t matter how safe you think you are, if the other guy is not safe, he/she can hit you even if you don’t want them to. That’s why I totally agree with FLU that if we just raise the standard for people to get driver license, that would be the best way to reduce accident.
April 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM #381119anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]One other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor. [/quote]
One simple fix for that would be to lower the SUV/CUV so the center of gravity would the similar to a car. Once again, physics is your friend.Like FLU said, safety and mpg are two different issue. You don’t have to sacrifice mpg for a bigger car. If you get those big SUV/CUV with a small I4 engine, your mpg will be pretty decent too. It doesn’t matter how safe you think you are, if the other guy is not safe, he/she can hit you even if you don’t want them to. That’s why I totally agree with FLU that if we just raise the standard for people to get driver license, that would be the best way to reduce accident.
April 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM #381168anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]One other thing for the SUVs. Rollover factor. [/quote]
One simple fix for that would be to lower the SUV/CUV so the center of gravity would the similar to a car. Once again, physics is your friend.Like FLU said, safety and mpg are two different issue. You don’t have to sacrifice mpg for a bigger car. If you get those big SUV/CUV with a small I4 engine, your mpg will be pretty decent too. It doesn’t matter how safe you think you are, if the other guy is not safe, he/she can hit you even if you don’t want them to. That’s why I totally agree with FLU that if we just raise the standard for people to get driver license, that would be the best way to reduce accident.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.