- This topic has 215 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 14, 2009 at 8:20 AM #381132April 14, 2009 at 8:29 AM #380524NoobParticipant
To me, this is an issue of relativity. While it is absolutely true that wieght is an important factor in survivability, it is only true in a relative sense. It isn’t the absolute wieght of the vehicle that makes it safe (or dangerous), its the relative wieght of the vehicle compared to the one its going to hit.
The problem is that there are huge cars on the road, and a growing number of tiny ones. Its the disparity that creates the danger. If we all drove tiny cars, we would all be safer. The problem only exists when one person decides that its his right to drive a tank at the expense of everyone else’s safety.
To me, this safety issue, coupled with the geopolitical consequencies of relying on unfriendly people for our engery and with the ecological consequences of the lager vehicles, its a no-brainer to outlaw SUVs and mandate vehicle size.
April 14, 2009 at 8:29 AM #380797NoobParticipantTo me, this is an issue of relativity. While it is absolutely true that wieght is an important factor in survivability, it is only true in a relative sense. It isn’t the absolute wieght of the vehicle that makes it safe (or dangerous), its the relative wieght of the vehicle compared to the one its going to hit.
The problem is that there are huge cars on the road, and a growing number of tiny ones. Its the disparity that creates the danger. If we all drove tiny cars, we would all be safer. The problem only exists when one person decides that its his right to drive a tank at the expense of everyone else’s safety.
To me, this safety issue, coupled with the geopolitical consequencies of relying on unfriendly people for our engery and with the ecological consequences of the lager vehicles, its a no-brainer to outlaw SUVs and mandate vehicle size.
April 14, 2009 at 8:29 AM #380985NoobParticipantTo me, this is an issue of relativity. While it is absolutely true that wieght is an important factor in survivability, it is only true in a relative sense. It isn’t the absolute wieght of the vehicle that makes it safe (or dangerous), its the relative wieght of the vehicle compared to the one its going to hit.
The problem is that there are huge cars on the road, and a growing number of tiny ones. Its the disparity that creates the danger. If we all drove tiny cars, we would all be safer. The problem only exists when one person decides that its his right to drive a tank at the expense of everyone else’s safety.
To me, this safety issue, coupled with the geopolitical consequencies of relying on unfriendly people for our engery and with the ecological consequences of the lager vehicles, its a no-brainer to outlaw SUVs and mandate vehicle size.
April 14, 2009 at 8:29 AM #381033NoobParticipantTo me, this is an issue of relativity. While it is absolutely true that wieght is an important factor in survivability, it is only true in a relative sense. It isn’t the absolute wieght of the vehicle that makes it safe (or dangerous), its the relative wieght of the vehicle compared to the one its going to hit.
The problem is that there are huge cars on the road, and a growing number of tiny ones. Its the disparity that creates the danger. If we all drove tiny cars, we would all be safer. The problem only exists when one person decides that its his right to drive a tank at the expense of everyone else’s safety.
To me, this safety issue, coupled with the geopolitical consequencies of relying on unfriendly people for our engery and with the ecological consequences of the lager vehicles, its a no-brainer to outlaw SUVs and mandate vehicle size.
April 14, 2009 at 8:29 AM #381161NoobParticipantTo me, this is an issue of relativity. While it is absolutely true that wieght is an important factor in survivability, it is only true in a relative sense. It isn’t the absolute wieght of the vehicle that makes it safe (or dangerous), its the relative wieght of the vehicle compared to the one its going to hit.
The problem is that there are huge cars on the road, and a growing number of tiny ones. Its the disparity that creates the danger. If we all drove tiny cars, we would all be safer. The problem only exists when one person decides that its his right to drive a tank at the expense of everyone else’s safety.
To me, this safety issue, coupled with the geopolitical consequencies of relying on unfriendly people for our engery and with the ecological consequences of the lager vehicles, its a no-brainer to outlaw SUVs and mandate vehicle size.
April 14, 2009 at 8:44 AM #380544garysearsParticipantSo now we want government to regulate passenger vehicle size for us? Ok, what about trucks? Do we have to have separate truck only roads to ensure vehicles of separate weights don’t cross paths? Can I still rent a Uhaul or will that be outlawed in the name of safety?
April 14, 2009 at 8:44 AM #380817garysearsParticipantSo now we want government to regulate passenger vehicle size for us? Ok, what about trucks? Do we have to have separate truck only roads to ensure vehicles of separate weights don’t cross paths? Can I still rent a Uhaul or will that be outlawed in the name of safety?
April 14, 2009 at 8:44 AM #381005garysearsParticipantSo now we want government to regulate passenger vehicle size for us? Ok, what about trucks? Do we have to have separate truck only roads to ensure vehicles of separate weights don’t cross paths? Can I still rent a Uhaul or will that be outlawed in the name of safety?
April 14, 2009 at 8:44 AM #381053garysearsParticipantSo now we want government to regulate passenger vehicle size for us? Ok, what about trucks? Do we have to have separate truck only roads to ensure vehicles of separate weights don’t cross paths? Can I still rent a Uhaul or will that be outlawed in the name of safety?
April 14, 2009 at 8:44 AM #381181garysearsParticipantSo now we want government to regulate passenger vehicle size for us? Ok, what about trucks? Do we have to have separate truck only roads to ensure vehicles of separate weights don’t cross paths? Can I still rent a Uhaul or will that be outlawed in the name of safety?
April 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #380549waitingpatientlyParticipantI have two little ones and drive a “tank”. I would definately buy and use a smaller car IF EVERYONE else agreed as well. I am a very defensive driver and still feel uneasy when I see a YukonXL coming at me with the driver talking on their phone.
The cost of gas will have no impact on my decision to drive my car. You can’t put a price on safety.
April 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #380822waitingpatientlyParticipantI have two little ones and drive a “tank”. I would definately buy and use a smaller car IF EVERYONE else agreed as well. I am a very defensive driver and still feel uneasy when I see a YukonXL coming at me with the driver talking on their phone.
The cost of gas will have no impact on my decision to drive my car. You can’t put a price on safety.
April 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #381010waitingpatientlyParticipantI have two little ones and drive a “tank”. I would definately buy and use a smaller car IF EVERYONE else agreed as well. I am a very defensive driver and still feel uneasy when I see a YukonXL coming at me with the driver talking on their phone.
The cost of gas will have no impact on my decision to drive my car. You can’t put a price on safety.
April 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM #381058waitingpatientlyParticipantI have two little ones and drive a “tank”. I would definately buy and use a smaller car IF EVERYONE else agreed as well. I am a very defensive driver and still feel uneasy when I see a YukonXL coming at me with the driver talking on their phone.
The cost of gas will have no impact on my decision to drive my car. You can’t put a price on safety.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.