Off Topic: Obama Sued in Philly Fed Court by Dem Activist

[afx114]

Of course I care that he’s elligible. It’s been proven that he is. Countless times. By trusted authorities. How many times must it be proven to you? 5? 10? One meeeeeelllion times?

Ok, I’ll play your game. Lets assume Obama doesn’t have a valid US birth certificate. That means that he would have to be registered with the INS as either a permanent resident alien, with a valid green card, or a naturalized citizen. Lets ask the INS if he’s in their database… Oh he’s not? If he was a naturalized citizen, he would surely be in the INS database as such. If he doesn’t have a valid US birth certificate, nor is he a registered resident alien, nor is he a naturalized citizen, that means he’s an illegal alien, right?

Are you claiming that Obama is an illegal alien? Could an illegal alien have attended Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law? Could an illegal alien served in the Illinois and US Senate? If Obama is an illegal alien, why isn’t the INS busting down his door right now and shipping him off to his native land?

Sounds like its time to call up the Minutemen, because the Border Patrol and INS obviously aren’t doing their jobs. BUILD THE FENCE!

If Obama wasn’t born here…
AND he is not a permanent resident alien…
AND he is not a naturalized citizen…
AND he tricked Occidental college into admitting him…
AND he tricked Columbia University into admitting him…
AND he tricked Harvard Law into admitting him…
AND he tricked the Illinois Senate into admitting him…
AND he tricked the US Senate into admitting him…
AND he tricked the Democratic electorate into picking him as their candidate…
AND he tricked the DNC into letting him be the nominee…

Then holy shit, it looks to me like Obama IS the second coming of Christ.

ALL of these entities have vetted Obama. And you expect the knowledge, research, and wisdom of a member of the McCain Keyboard Brigade such as yourself to trump them? I hate to break it to you, but the above listed entities have a hell of a lot more pull than you, a lonely anonymous forum troll.

You see, the reason you are such a joke is because for your claims to be true, a multitude of impossible situations must have taken place. In logic speak, you need to prove about 15 antecedents before confirming the consequent. I’d like to see you do it. Seriously. If you can prove all of those antecedents I’ve listed above, I’ll shrivel up and wallow in my own pity and kiss your toes. If you can’t prove all of those antecedents, then you need to stop posting the same tired arguments over and over again (only to be disproved over and over again). Your claims are so outrageously ridiculous that they make no sense in the fact-based world. Of course, facts have a well-known liberal bias.

[SDEngineer]

[quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[SDEngineer]

[quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[SDEngineer]

[quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[SDEngineer]

[quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[SDEngineer]

[quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[jficquette]

Afx,

See, you resort to name calling because you have no case.

You keep saying that Obama has been proven to be eligible. Why then does an ex deputy Atty General of a huge state file a suit claiming otherwise? Maybe you should call him and let him know he is barking up the wrong tree since you appear to be the only one that knows that he has been proven to be eligible. You could save Mr. Berg some time. Give him a call.

Illegals get into our schools all the time. They get in our public schools, colleges, even the voting booth. Obama didn’t have to trick any school into admitting him. They never asked.

If you had had the stomach to read any of the material posted here you would know that the issue is not one of citizenship but if he a natural born citizen. That is the test for eligiblity.

Why is it the liberal way to resort to name calling and vulgar language??

John

[jficquette]

Afx,

See, you resort to name calling because you have no case.

You keep saying that Obama has been proven to be eligible. Why then does an ex deputy Atty General of a huge state file a suit claiming otherwise? Maybe you should call him and let him know he is barking up the wrong tree since you appear to be the only one that knows that he has been proven to be eligible. You could save Mr. Berg some time. Give him a call.

Illegals get into our schools all the time. They get in our public schools, colleges, even the voting booth. Obama didn’t have to trick any school into admitting him. They never asked.

If you had had the stomach to read any of the material posted here you would know that the issue is not one of citizenship but if he a natural born citizen. That is the test for eligiblity.

Why is it the liberal way to resort to name calling and vulgar language??

John

[jficquette]

Afx,

See, you resort to name calling because you have no case.

You keep saying that Obama has been proven to be eligible. Why then does an ex deputy Atty General of a huge state file a suit claiming otherwise? Maybe you should call him and let him know he is barking up the wrong tree since you appear to be the only one that knows that he has been proven to be eligible. You could save Mr. Berg some time. Give him a call.

Illegals get into our schools all the time. They get in our public schools, colleges, even the voting booth. Obama didn’t have to trick any school into admitting him. They never asked.

If you had had the stomach to read any of the material posted here you would know that the issue is not one of citizenship but if he a natural born citizen. That is the test for eligiblity.

Why is it the liberal way to resort to name calling and vulgar language??

John

[jficquette]

Afx,

See, you resort to name calling because you have no case.

You keep saying that Obama has been proven to be eligible. Why then does an ex deputy Atty General of a huge state file a suit claiming otherwise? Maybe you should call him and let him know he is barking up the wrong tree since you appear to be the only one that knows that he has been proven to be eligible. You could save Mr. Berg some time. Give him a call.

Illegals get into our schools all the time. They get in our public schools, colleges, even the voting booth. Obama didn’t have to trick any school into admitting him. They never asked.

If you had had the stomach to read any of the material posted here you would know that the issue is not one of citizenship but if he a natural born citizen. That is the test for eligiblity.

Why is it the liberal way to resort to name calling and vulgar language??

John

[jficquette]

Afx,

See, you resort to name calling because you have no case.

You keep saying that Obama has been proven to be eligible. Why then does an ex deputy Atty General of a huge state file a suit claiming otherwise? Maybe you should call him and let him know he is barking up the wrong tree since you appear to be the only one that knows that he has been proven to be eligible. You could save Mr. Berg some time. Give him a call.

Illegals get into our schools all the time. They get in our public schools, colleges, even the voting booth. Obama didn’t have to trick any school into admitting him. They never asked.

If you had had the stomach to read any of the material posted here you would know that the issue is not one of citizenship but if he a natural born citizen. That is the test for eligiblity.

Why is it the liberal way to resort to name calling and vulgar language??

John

[jficquette]

[quote=SDEngineer][quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[/quote]

Decades of public service?? He has been in the Senate one term, served 4 years as a state legislator.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=SDEngineer][quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[/quote]

Decades of public service?? He has been in the Senate one term, served 4 years as a state legislator.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=SDEngineer][quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[/quote]

Decades of public service?? He has been in the Senate one term, served 4 years as a state legislator.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=SDEngineer][quote=arraya]Yes, I really did just bust out a Yoda quote to show how ridiculous they are.

A: I think McCain is a slightly bigger nightmere than Obama
B: The question I posed is valid.
C: I did not say it was fake. I stated the use of “African” to describe a black person was not commonly used if at all in 1961, therefore it is suspect.

Any google search on the political correctness movement can cite this. It’s well documented.

So again how was my question ridiculous? In what way?
[/quote]

So? Assuming that the hospital has upgraded their records to computer storage, it’s very likely they standardized the entries at the same time they did this. Nobody as far as I know is claiming that this is an ORIGINAL birth certificate from the 60’s, it’s a certified copy from hospital records (in fact, the copy I’ve seen on the web clearly isn’t, since it is clearly computer printed as opposed to hand-typed.)

It’s very likely that what happened is that the hospital when placing those records into the computer simply standardized on the currently PC choices, rather than have older records use different terminology for race.

I find this a more likely ad-hoc explanation than the alternative which implies a pretty massive conspiracy that has held up to decades of public service.

[/quote]

Decades of public service?? He has been in the Senate one term, served 4 years as a state legislator.

John

[Author]

Posts