Off Topic: Obama Sued in Philly Fed Court by Dem Activist

[Allan from Fallbrook]

afx: Except the birth certificate isn’t on certified Hawaiian coconut paper and doesn’t use banana-based ink, which, as everyone familiar with the State of Hawaii knows, makes it a fake.

This lawsuit appears to be nothing other than a last gasp attempt by a Hillary supporter to throw a monkey wrench into the process and hamstring the DNC.

I think Obama’s choice of Biden is political genius. Anyone trying to question his foreign policy chops now has to deal with one of the most experienced operators on the Hill, and of the most adept policy wonks out there when it comes to foreign affairs and policy.

[Arraya]

Take a look at the certificate. It lists his race as AFRICAN. I believe they used NEGRO in 1961.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.htm

Up until 1968, the standard term for all Africans was “negroe”. This fit with the absolute secular scientific teaching of the day which notes the world has 3 races in Mongoloid, Caucasoid and Negroid.

It was not until the Black Revolution when negroe or negro became a foul description in the late 1960’s and then “black” was demanded by this group to describe them.

It was not until the late 1970’s when political correctness came into vogue that it ushered in by the 1980’s the term “African” to describe all blacks.

Fact Check does not address this.

I’m not saying it’s fake but that is a huge red flag IMO and not addressed.

Any black person born in the early 60s want to chime in for the sake of truth. Where is partypup when you need her?

Here’s what fact check says.

“We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.”

“Corsi isn’t the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:
-The birth certificate doesn’t have a raised seal.
-It isn’t signed.
-No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.
-In the zoomed-in view, there’s a strange halo around the letters.
-The certificate number is blacked out.
-The date bleeding through from the back seems to say “2007,” but the document wasn’t released until 2008.
-The document is a “certification of birth,” not a “certificate of birth.”

[Arraya]

Take a look at the certificate. It lists his race as AFRICAN. I believe they used NEGRO in 1961.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.htm

Up until 1968, the standard term for all Africans was “negroe”. This fit with the absolute secular scientific teaching of the day which notes the world has 3 races in Mongoloid, Caucasoid and Negroid.

It was not until the Black Revolution when negroe or negro became a foul description in the late 1960’s and then “black” was demanded by this group to describe them.

It was not until the late 1970’s when political correctness came into vogue that it ushered in by the 1980’s the term “African” to describe all blacks.

Fact Check does not address this.

I’m not saying it’s fake but that is a huge red flag IMO and not addressed.

Any black person born in the early 60s want to chime in for the sake of truth. Where is partypup when you need her?

Here’s what fact check says.

“We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.”

“Corsi isn’t the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:
-The birth certificate doesn’t have a raised seal.
-It isn’t signed.
-No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.
-In the zoomed-in view, there’s a strange halo around the letters.
-The certificate number is blacked out.
-The date bleeding through from the back seems to say “2007,” but the document wasn’t released until 2008.
-The document is a “certification of birth,” not a “certificate of birth.”

[Arraya]

Take a look at the certificate. It lists his race as AFRICAN. I believe they used NEGRO in 1961.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.htm

Up until 1968, the standard term for all Africans was “negroe”. This fit with the absolute secular scientific teaching of the day which notes the world has 3 races in Mongoloid, Caucasoid and Negroid.

It was not until the Black Revolution when negroe or negro became a foul description in the late 1960’s and then “black” was demanded by this group to describe them.

It was not until the late 1970’s when political correctness came into vogue that it ushered in by the 1980’s the term “African” to describe all blacks.

Fact Check does not address this.

I’m not saying it’s fake but that is a huge red flag IMO and not addressed.

Any black person born in the early 60s want to chime in for the sake of truth. Where is partypup when you need her?

Here’s what fact check says.

“We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.”

“Corsi isn’t the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:
-The birth certificate doesn’t have a raised seal.
-It isn’t signed.
-No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.
-In the zoomed-in view, there’s a strange halo around the letters.
-The certificate number is blacked out.
-The date bleeding through from the back seems to say “2007,” but the document wasn’t released until 2008.
-The document is a “certification of birth,” not a “certificate of birth.”

[Arraya]

Take a look at the certificate. It lists his race as AFRICAN. I believe they used NEGRO in 1961.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.htm

Up until 1968, the standard term for all Africans was “negroe”. This fit with the absolute secular scientific teaching of the day which notes the world has 3 races in Mongoloid, Caucasoid and Negroid.

It was not until the Black Revolution when negroe or negro became a foul description in the late 1960’s and then “black” was demanded by this group to describe them.

It was not until the late 1970’s when political correctness came into vogue that it ushered in by the 1980’s the term “African” to describe all blacks.

Fact Check does not address this.

I’m not saying it’s fake but that is a huge red flag IMO and not addressed.

Any black person born in the early 60s want to chime in for the sake of truth. Where is partypup when you need her?

Here’s what fact check says.

“We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.”

“Corsi isn’t the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:
-The birth certificate doesn’t have a raised seal.
-It isn’t signed.
-No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.
-In the zoomed-in view, there’s a strange halo around the letters.
-The certificate number is blacked out.
-The date bleeding through from the back seems to say “2007,” but the document wasn’t released until 2008.
-The document is a “certification of birth,” not a “certificate of birth.”

[Arraya]

Take a look at the certificate. It lists his race as AFRICAN. I believe they used NEGRO in 1961.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.htm

Up until 1968, the standard term for all Africans was “negroe”. This fit with the absolute secular scientific teaching of the day which notes the world has 3 races in Mongoloid, Caucasoid and Negroid.

It was not until the Black Revolution when negroe or negro became a foul description in the late 1960’s and then “black” was demanded by this group to describe them.

It was not until the late 1970’s when political correctness came into vogue that it ushered in by the 1980’s the term “African” to describe all blacks.

Fact Check does not address this.

I’m not saying it’s fake but that is a huge red flag IMO and not addressed.

Any black person born in the early 60s want to chime in for the sake of truth. Where is partypup when you need her?

Here’s what fact check says.

“We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.”

“Corsi isn’t the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:
-The birth certificate doesn’t have a raised seal.
-It isn’t signed.
-No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.
-In the zoomed-in view, there’s a strange halo around the letters.
-The certificate number is blacked out.
-The date bleeding through from the back seems to say “2007,” but the document wasn’t released until 2008.
-The document is a “certification of birth,” not a “certificate of birth.”

[Arraya]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

Negro is a term referring to people of Black African ancestry. Prior to the shift in the lexicon of American and worldwide classification of race and ethnicity in the late 1960s, the appellation was accepted as a normal neutral formal term both by those of Black African descent as well as non-African blacks. Now it is often considered an ethnic slur[1][2][3] although the term is considered archaic and is not even common as a racist slur.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html

[Arraya]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

Negro is a term referring to people of Black African ancestry. Prior to the shift in the lexicon of American and worldwide classification of race and ethnicity in the late 1960s, the appellation was accepted as a normal neutral formal term both by those of Black African descent as well as non-African blacks. Now it is often considered an ethnic slur[1][2][3] although the term is considered archaic and is not even common as a racist slur.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html

[Arraya]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

Negro is a term referring to people of Black African ancestry. Prior to the shift in the lexicon of American and worldwide classification of race and ethnicity in the late 1960s, the appellation was accepted as a normal neutral formal term both by those of Black African descent as well as non-African blacks. Now it is often considered an ethnic slur[1][2][3] although the term is considered archaic and is not even common as a racist slur.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html

[Arraya]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

Negro is a term referring to people of Black African ancestry. Prior to the shift in the lexicon of American and worldwide classification of race and ethnicity in the late 1960s, the appellation was accepted as a normal neutral formal term both by those of Black African descent as well as non-African blacks. Now it is often considered an ethnic slur[1][2][3] although the term is considered archaic and is not even common as a racist slur.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html

[Arraya]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

Negro is a term referring to people of Black African ancestry. Prior to the shift in the lexicon of American and worldwide classification of race and ethnicity in the late 1960s, the appellation was accepted as a normal neutral formal term both by those of Black African descent as well as non-African blacks. Now it is often considered an ethnic slur[1][2][3] although the term is considered archaic and is not even common as a racist slur.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html

[svelte]

I guess the United Negro College Fund didn’t get the memo about Wikipedia considering the term to be a slur.

[svelte]

I guess the United Negro College Fund didn’t get the memo about Wikipedia considering the term to be a slur.

[svelte]

I guess the United Negro College Fund didn’t get the memo about Wikipedia considering the term to be a slur.

[svelte]

I guess the United Negro College Fund didn’t get the memo about Wikipedia considering the term to be a slur.

[Author]

Posts