McCain”s moral compass

[Ex-SD]

[quote=marion]DWCAP, a decent, family man does NOT leave a crippled wife. She was a model or former model when he married her, and he left because the horrible car accident she was involved in rendered her “ugly”. His reasons for leaving should be obvious by virtue of who he cheated on her with and subsequently married: Blonde, statuesque, WEALTHY Cindy. An exact replica of “Barbie”.

McCain has as much character and integrity as a street rat. And that’s not to say that some of the dems are any better.[/quote]

Now Marion……….you don’t have one bit of first-hand knowledge about any of that stuff you just posted. I’m not for McCain or Obama but slamming a war hero who spent a long time as a prisoner in Vietnam just rubs me wrong. You’ve called him senile, an old fogey, etc and I would bet some hard money that you’ve never met McCain or had a conversation with him. Come on now…………don’t you think that if someone attacked your idol, B.O., the way you’ve been attacking McCain on this forum, that you would be climbing the walls and screaming? Lighten up. 🙂

[Anonymous]

Yeah, but how many years after he found her cripped, did he cheat on her? In any event, from the outside looking in, I don’t know the whole story, so I should be careful of what I say. Checked. I think it’s fair to say that it doesn’t look good though.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, but how many years after he found her cripped, did he cheat on her? In any event, from the outside looking in, I don’t know the whole story, so I should be careful of what I say. Checked. I think it’s fair to say that it doesn’t look good though.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, but how many years after he found her cripped, did he cheat on her? In any event, from the outside looking in, I don’t know the whole story, so I should be careful of what I say. Checked. I think it’s fair to say that it doesn’t look good though.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, but how many years after he found her cripped, did he cheat on her? In any event, from the outside looking in, I don’t know the whole story, so I should be careful of what I say. Checked. I think it’s fair to say that it doesn’t look good though.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, but how many years after he found her cripped, did he cheat on her? In any event, from the outside looking in, I don’t know the whole story, so I should be careful of what I say. Checked. I think it’s fair to say that it doesn’t look good though.

[DWCAP]

I sure am glad that you know more about why people you have never met did something 28 years ago than they do.

She told you why he left, he had a midlife crisis when adjusting to a new world and felt younger than his age and place in life dictated. That is it, not because of her looks. Seeing how he stayed with the next woman for the next 3 decades, he obviously had something more in common with her than just her looks.

I never saw anywhere in the article where they said he cheated. Sure, he married someone else 1 month after they were divorced, possibly for financial reasons as well as looks, but that isnt cheating. If the author could have substanciated ANY cheating, he would have.

I am sure you really dont like this guy. I am sure this is a very sore subject for you. I am sure it would be very convient if you could justify your dislike for the guy with something you have a deep personal experience with. But dont judge people on something they didnt do. People get divorced for a large number of reasons, not just cause he is a lying, cheating asshole “sewer rat” who only cares about his wife because of her looks. Especially when they come home to a family they have been kept from for 5 years to find it radically different than what they remember.

If you had used the Kating 5 or something similar I would be very open to your opnion. This just smacks of tablod journalism that belongs right up there with “Angolina has twins”. Oh wait, no she didnt, she is still pregnant.

[DWCAP]

I sure am glad that you know more about why people you have never met did something 28 years ago than they do.

She told you why he left, he had a midlife crisis when adjusting to a new world and felt younger than his age and place in life dictated. That is it, not because of her looks. Seeing how he stayed with the next woman for the next 3 decades, he obviously had something more in common with her than just her looks.

I never saw anywhere in the article where they said he cheated. Sure, he married someone else 1 month after they were divorced, possibly for financial reasons as well as looks, but that isnt cheating. If the author could have substanciated ANY cheating, he would have.

I am sure you really dont like this guy. I am sure this is a very sore subject for you. I am sure it would be very convient if you could justify your dislike for the guy with something you have a deep personal experience with. But dont judge people on something they didnt do. People get divorced for a large number of reasons, not just cause he is a lying, cheating asshole “sewer rat” who only cares about his wife because of her looks. Especially when they come home to a family they have been kept from for 5 years to find it radically different than what they remember.

If you had used the Kating 5 or something similar I would be very open to your opnion. This just smacks of tablod journalism that belongs right up there with “Angolina has twins”. Oh wait, no she didnt, she is still pregnant.

[DWCAP]

I sure am glad that you know more about why people you have never met did something 28 years ago than they do.

She told you why he left, he had a midlife crisis when adjusting to a new world and felt younger than his age and place in life dictated. That is it, not because of her looks. Seeing how he stayed with the next woman for the next 3 decades, he obviously had something more in common with her than just her looks.

I never saw anywhere in the article where they said he cheated. Sure, he married someone else 1 month after they were divorced, possibly for financial reasons as well as looks, but that isnt cheating. If the author could have substanciated ANY cheating, he would have.

I am sure you really dont like this guy. I am sure this is a very sore subject for you. I am sure it would be very convient if you could justify your dislike for the guy with something you have a deep personal experience with. But dont judge people on something they didnt do. People get divorced for a large number of reasons, not just cause he is a lying, cheating asshole “sewer rat” who only cares about his wife because of her looks. Especially when they come home to a family they have been kept from for 5 years to find it radically different than what they remember.

If you had used the Kating 5 or something similar I would be very open to your opnion. This just smacks of tablod journalism that belongs right up there with “Angolina has twins”. Oh wait, no she didnt, she is still pregnant.

[DWCAP]

I sure am glad that you know more about why people you have never met did something 28 years ago than they do.

She told you why he left, he had a midlife crisis when adjusting to a new world and felt younger than his age and place in life dictated. That is it, not because of her looks. Seeing how he stayed with the next woman for the next 3 decades, he obviously had something more in common with her than just her looks.

I never saw anywhere in the article where they said he cheated. Sure, he married someone else 1 month after they were divorced, possibly for financial reasons as well as looks, but that isnt cheating. If the author could have substanciated ANY cheating, he would have.

I am sure you really dont like this guy. I am sure this is a very sore subject for you. I am sure it would be very convient if you could justify your dislike for the guy with something you have a deep personal experience with. But dont judge people on something they didnt do. People get divorced for a large number of reasons, not just cause he is a lying, cheating asshole “sewer rat” who only cares about his wife because of her looks. Especially when they come home to a family they have been kept from for 5 years to find it radically different than what they remember.

If you had used the Kating 5 or something similar I would be very open to your opnion. This just smacks of tablod journalism that belongs right up there with “Angolina has twins”. Oh wait, no she didnt, she is still pregnant.

[DWCAP]

I sure am glad that you know more about why people you have never met did something 28 years ago than they do.

She told you why he left, he had a midlife crisis when adjusting to a new world and felt younger than his age and place in life dictated. That is it, not because of her looks. Seeing how he stayed with the next woman for the next 3 decades, he obviously had something more in common with her than just her looks.

I never saw anywhere in the article where they said he cheated. Sure, he married someone else 1 month after they were divorced, possibly for financial reasons as well as looks, but that isnt cheating. If the author could have substanciated ANY cheating, he would have.

I am sure you really dont like this guy. I am sure this is a very sore subject for you. I am sure it would be very convient if you could justify your dislike for the guy with something you have a deep personal experience with. But dont judge people on something they didnt do. People get divorced for a large number of reasons, not just cause he is a lying, cheating asshole “sewer rat” who only cares about his wife because of her looks. Especially when they come home to a family they have been kept from for 5 years to find it radically different than what they remember.

If you had used the Kating 5 or something similar I would be very open to your opnion. This just smacks of tablod journalism that belongs right up there with “Angolina has twins”. Oh wait, no she didnt, she is still pregnant.

[kev374]

[quote=asianautica] Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?[/quote]

Amen to that! what we don’t need is socialism. America has become great because of the philosophy that the harder you work the more rewards you get to keep. Sadly these socialists are trying to take from those who work 2x as hard and give to those that put in only minimal amount of effort.

We need FAIR taxation across the board. Sure, exempt the lowest income that is needed to subsist from income taxes but AFTER that it should be flat tax. Everybody pays their share as a percentage equally.

[kev374]

[quote=asianautica] Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?[/quote]

Amen to that! what we don’t need is socialism. America has become great because of the philosophy that the harder you work the more rewards you get to keep. Sadly these socialists are trying to take from those who work 2x as hard and give to those that put in only minimal amount of effort.

We need FAIR taxation across the board. Sure, exempt the lowest income that is needed to subsist from income taxes but AFTER that it should be flat tax. Everybody pays their share as a percentage equally.

[kev374]

[quote=asianautica] Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?[/quote]

Amen to that! what we don’t need is socialism. America has become great because of the philosophy that the harder you work the more rewards you get to keep. Sadly these socialists are trying to take from those who work 2x as hard and give to those that put in only minimal amount of effort.

We need FAIR taxation across the board. Sure, exempt the lowest income that is needed to subsist from income taxes but AFTER that it should be flat tax. Everybody pays their share as a percentage equally.

[kev374]

[quote=asianautica] Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?[/quote]

Amen to that! what we don’t need is socialism. America has become great because of the philosophy that the harder you work the more rewards you get to keep. Sadly these socialists are trying to take from those who work 2x as hard and give to those that put in only minimal amount of effort.

We need FAIR taxation across the board. Sure, exempt the lowest income that is needed to subsist from income taxes but AFTER that it should be flat tax. Everybody pays their share as a percentage equally.

[Author]

Posts