Mad as Hell and not going to take it anymore ???

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=CDMA ENG][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Please. America needs to take a deep breath, untwist our little knickers and grow up. This kind of pathetic whelping is exactly why we have this childish dependence on Big Government to protect us from all the evils of the big, bad world.
[/quote]

We do? All this time I have depended on two fine austrians to do that…

Sig and Sauer.

😛

CE[/quote]

CE: Hoo-ah. Personally, I like Mr. Remington, backed up by Mr. Glock (in .45ACP).

I’ve owned a couple of Sigs in my time, but there’s something about a .45 with a 13+1 capacity that just warms the cockles of my evil little heart. Especially when those 14 rounds are 230gr Hydra-Shoks.[/quote]

You can take a man out with the shock wave alone from that thing…

I went the middle route between awesome power and controlabilty…. .40 Cal… and I carry the .357 Sig round too…

By the way the .357 Sig is a hot little round with not much more loss in accuracy than the forty..

As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…

[Ricechex]

Something is funny here….he crashed into a federal building and only a couple of people were in it. At 10AM on a work day–shouldn’t the building have been fully occupied?

[Ricechex]

Something is funny here….he crashed into a federal building and only a couple of people were in it. At 10AM on a work day–shouldn’t the building have been fully occupied?

[Ricechex]

Something is funny here….he crashed into a federal building and only a couple of people were in it. At 10AM on a work day–shouldn’t the building have been fully occupied?

[Ricechex]

Something is funny here….he crashed into a federal building and only a couple of people were in it. At 10AM on a work day–shouldn’t the building have been fully occupied?

[Ricechex]

Something is funny here….he crashed into a federal building and only a couple of people were in it. At 10AM on a work day–shouldn’t the building have been fully occupied?

[meadandale]

[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.

Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.

The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]

It’s truly 1984 with this administration…

[meadandale]

[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.

Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.

The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]

It’s truly 1984 with this administration…

[meadandale]

[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.

Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.

The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]

It’s truly 1984 with this administration…

[meadandale]

[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.

Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.

The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]

It’s truly 1984 with this administration…

[meadandale]

[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.

Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.

The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]

It’s truly 1984 with this administration…

[meadandale]

[quote=CDMA ENG]
As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…[/quote]

I don’t know…as far as I’m concerned, no one who works for the government is ‘innocent’. And frankly, I think that there are many more people than we want to acknowledge that are one tax audit away from becoming this guy or another McVeigh.

[meadandale]

[quote=CDMA ENG]
As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…[/quote]

I don’t know…as far as I’m concerned, no one who works for the government is ‘innocent’. And frankly, I think that there are many more people than we want to acknowledge that are one tax audit away from becoming this guy or another McVeigh.

[meadandale]

[quote=CDMA ENG]
As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…[/quote]

I don’t know…as far as I’m concerned, no one who works for the government is ‘innocent’. And frankly, I think that there are many more people than we want to acknowledge that are one tax audit away from becoming this guy or another McVeigh.

[meadandale]

[quote=CDMA ENG]
As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…[/quote]

I don’t know…as far as I’m concerned, no one who works for the government is ‘innocent’. And frankly, I think that there are many more people than we want to acknowledge that are one tax audit away from becoming this guy or another McVeigh.

[Author]

Posts