Just wondering where all the “Bring it on people” are at

[NotCranky]

Rockemesock,She specifically said “wait for the bank to bail me out. My reply is totally to that content. Your scenario sounds doesn’t sound like fun either. Who would want to go through that, instead of living a reasonably financially secure, stable, responsible life in the interim? Living well is it’s own reward isn’t it?

[jpinpb]

Rockemsock has it right. I’ve seen NODs on places go for 12+ months. Still no foreclosure. You can live there for 12 months and just bank your monthly payment — or rent equivalent.

So many options were available, but the zero risk was something I should’ve picked up on. Buy a house w/zero down and flip and make a profit. If the market tanks, live there for free and bank your cash monthly.

Worse case, the bank reduces your principle and/or lowers your rate.

Meanwhile, you’ve been living in a nice place you never had any business buying.

I’m just frustrated, so don’t mind me. Trying to play by the rules when many weren’t.

[jpinpb]

Rockemsock has it right. I’ve seen NODs on places go for 12+ months. Still no foreclosure. You can live there for 12 months and just bank your monthly payment — or rent equivalent.

So many options were available, but the zero risk was something I should’ve picked up on. Buy a house w/zero down and flip and make a profit. If the market tanks, live there for free and bank your cash monthly.

Worse case, the bank reduces your principle and/or lowers your rate.

Meanwhile, you’ve been living in a nice place you never had any business buying.

I’m just frustrated, so don’t mind me. Trying to play by the rules when many weren’t.

[jpinpb]

Rockemsock has it right. I’ve seen NODs on places go for 12+ months. Still no foreclosure. You can live there for 12 months and just bank your monthly payment — or rent equivalent.

So many options were available, but the zero risk was something I should’ve picked up on. Buy a house w/zero down and flip and make a profit. If the market tanks, live there for free and bank your cash monthly.

Worse case, the bank reduces your principle and/or lowers your rate.

Meanwhile, you’ve been living in a nice place you never had any business buying.

I’m just frustrated, so don’t mind me. Trying to play by the rules when many weren’t.

[jpinpb]

Rockemsock has it right. I’ve seen NODs on places go for 12+ months. Still no foreclosure. You can live there for 12 months and just bank your monthly payment — or rent equivalent.

So many options were available, but the zero risk was something I should’ve picked up on. Buy a house w/zero down and flip and make a profit. If the market tanks, live there for free and bank your cash monthly.

Worse case, the bank reduces your principle and/or lowers your rate.

Meanwhile, you’ve been living in a nice place you never had any business buying.

I’m just frustrated, so don’t mind me. Trying to play by the rules when many weren’t.

[jpinpb]

Rockemsock has it right. I’ve seen NODs on places go for 12+ months. Still no foreclosure. You can live there for 12 months and just bank your monthly payment — or rent equivalent.

So many options were available, but the zero risk was something I should’ve picked up on. Buy a house w/zero down and flip and make a profit. If the market tanks, live there for free and bank your cash monthly.

Worse case, the bank reduces your principle and/or lowers your rate.

Meanwhile, you’ve been living in a nice place you never had any business buying.

I’m just frustrated, so don’t mind me. Trying to play by the rules when many weren’t.

[Rockemsock]

Rustico, sorry, I missed the “wait for the bank…” comment first read.

As for my scenario, I wouldn’t want to do that either, but only because I wouldn’t be able to enter into the loan agreement with good conscience. Living rent free for a good part of a year is quite nice when you don’t have a dual-income, been around the block for 2 decades bank account. But perhaps I’m simplifying that scenario too much…there are probably negatives that are more difficult to see from the outside looking in (collections, social-stigma?, moving, I’m reaching, that’s all I got).

[Rockemsock]

Rustico, sorry, I missed the “wait for the bank…” comment first read.

As for my scenario, I wouldn’t want to do that either, but only because I wouldn’t be able to enter into the loan agreement with good conscience. Living rent free for a good part of a year is quite nice when you don’t have a dual-income, been around the block for 2 decades bank account. But perhaps I’m simplifying that scenario too much…there are probably negatives that are more difficult to see from the outside looking in (collections, social-stigma?, moving, I’m reaching, that’s all I got).

[Rockemsock]

Rustico, sorry, I missed the “wait for the bank…” comment first read.

As for my scenario, I wouldn’t want to do that either, but only because I wouldn’t be able to enter into the loan agreement with good conscience. Living rent free for a good part of a year is quite nice when you don’t have a dual-income, been around the block for 2 decades bank account. But perhaps I’m simplifying that scenario too much…there are probably negatives that are more difficult to see from the outside looking in (collections, social-stigma?, moving, I’m reaching, that’s all I got).

[Rockemsock]

Rustico, sorry, I missed the “wait for the bank…” comment first read.

As for my scenario, I wouldn’t want to do that either, but only because I wouldn’t be able to enter into the loan agreement with good conscience. Living rent free for a good part of a year is quite nice when you don’t have a dual-income, been around the block for 2 decades bank account. But perhaps I’m simplifying that scenario too much…there are probably negatives that are more difficult to see from the outside looking in (collections, social-stigma?, moving, I’m reaching, that’s all I got).

[Rockemsock]

Rustico, sorry, I missed the “wait for the bank…” comment first read.

As for my scenario, I wouldn’t want to do that either, but only because I wouldn’t be able to enter into the loan agreement with good conscience. Living rent free for a good part of a year is quite nice when you don’t have a dual-income, been around the block for 2 decades bank account. But perhaps I’m simplifying that scenario too much…there are probably negatives that are more difficult to see from the outside looking in (collections, social-stigma?, moving, I’m reaching, that’s all I got).

[NotCranky]

Rockemsock, I wasn’t thinking about your scenario from an “I am so rich why would I bother perspective”. Like you, it is just something that would not appeal to me now matter how many people did it. Still, I think wanting to trade places is probably a case of the “grass is greener on the other side”, moral compunction aside.

[NotCranky]

Rockemsock, I wasn’t thinking about your scenario from an “I am so rich why would I bother perspective”. Like you, it is just something that would not appeal to me now matter how many people did it. Still, I think wanting to trade places is probably a case of the “grass is greener on the other side”, moral compunction aside.

[NotCranky]

Rockemsock, I wasn’t thinking about your scenario from an “I am so rich why would I bother perspective”. Like you, it is just something that would not appeal to me now matter how many people did it. Still, I think wanting to trade places is probably a case of the “grass is greener on the other side”, moral compunction aside.

[NotCranky]

Rockemsock, I wasn’t thinking about your scenario from an “I am so rich why would I bother perspective”. Like you, it is just something that would not appeal to me now matter how many people did it. Still, I think wanting to trade places is probably a case of the “grass is greener on the other side”, moral compunction aside.

[Author]

Posts