- This topic has 445 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 14, 2008 at 11:09 PM #305326November 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM #304898lonestar2000Participant
As I commented before (a long, long time ago, in another thread on a similar topic), although there were a couple of mal-contents calling for the resession itself, who don’t speak for the majority, most of us simply wanted a return to the normal level of affordability of housing. Now, if correcting the said cost inbalance requires a resession, then there simply is no other choice, but the balance must return one way or another. The inbalance was simply unsustainable and was a bubble waiting to burst.
Now that it has begun, it is bursting in a big way, and in some ways faster and more dramatically than most of us figured it would, and it certainly is no fun when a job loss or other calamity hist close to home, but if you’re realilstic you’ll agree that this correction is necessary and was inevitable.
So, to the end of restoring the inbalance — I say Bring it On — all the while smirking to myself because it matters not what I say, because the market will correct itself no matter what and there is not a thing that anyone can do about it, just like it has every single time in the past. As big as this inbalance was, so will the correction be…messy and unrelenting in its fury, wreacking everything in its path. Those who are to survive will learn to ride the wave, or get out of its way, because attempting to fight it is utter foolishness.
November 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM #305262lonestar2000ParticipantAs I commented before (a long, long time ago, in another thread on a similar topic), although there were a couple of mal-contents calling for the resession itself, who don’t speak for the majority, most of us simply wanted a return to the normal level of affordability of housing. Now, if correcting the said cost inbalance requires a resession, then there simply is no other choice, but the balance must return one way or another. The inbalance was simply unsustainable and was a bubble waiting to burst.
Now that it has begun, it is bursting in a big way, and in some ways faster and more dramatically than most of us figured it would, and it certainly is no fun when a job loss or other calamity hist close to home, but if you’re realilstic you’ll agree that this correction is necessary and was inevitable.
So, to the end of restoring the inbalance — I say Bring it On — all the while smirking to myself because it matters not what I say, because the market will correct itself no matter what and there is not a thing that anyone can do about it, just like it has every single time in the past. As big as this inbalance was, so will the correction be…messy and unrelenting in its fury, wreacking everything in its path. Those who are to survive will learn to ride the wave, or get out of its way, because attempting to fight it is utter foolishness.
November 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM #305274lonestar2000ParticipantAs I commented before (a long, long time ago, in another thread on a similar topic), although there were a couple of mal-contents calling for the resession itself, who don’t speak for the majority, most of us simply wanted a return to the normal level of affordability of housing. Now, if correcting the said cost inbalance requires a resession, then there simply is no other choice, but the balance must return one way or another. The inbalance was simply unsustainable and was a bubble waiting to burst.
Now that it has begun, it is bursting in a big way, and in some ways faster and more dramatically than most of us figured it would, and it certainly is no fun when a job loss or other calamity hist close to home, but if you’re realilstic you’ll agree that this correction is necessary and was inevitable.
So, to the end of restoring the inbalance — I say Bring it On — all the while smirking to myself because it matters not what I say, because the market will correct itself no matter what and there is not a thing that anyone can do about it, just like it has every single time in the past. As big as this inbalance was, so will the correction be…messy and unrelenting in its fury, wreacking everything in its path. Those who are to survive will learn to ride the wave, or get out of its way, because attempting to fight it is utter foolishness.
November 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM #305293lonestar2000ParticipantAs I commented before (a long, long time ago, in another thread on a similar topic), although there were a couple of mal-contents calling for the resession itself, who don’t speak for the majority, most of us simply wanted a return to the normal level of affordability of housing. Now, if correcting the said cost inbalance requires a resession, then there simply is no other choice, but the balance must return one way or another. The inbalance was simply unsustainable and was a bubble waiting to burst.
Now that it has begun, it is bursting in a big way, and in some ways faster and more dramatically than most of us figured it would, and it certainly is no fun when a job loss or other calamity hist close to home, but if you’re realilstic you’ll agree that this correction is necessary and was inevitable.
So, to the end of restoring the inbalance — I say Bring it On — all the while smirking to myself because it matters not what I say, because the market will correct itself no matter what and there is not a thing that anyone can do about it, just like it has every single time in the past. As big as this inbalance was, so will the correction be…messy and unrelenting in its fury, wreacking everything in its path. Those who are to survive will learn to ride the wave, or get out of its way, because attempting to fight it is utter foolishness.
November 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM #305351lonestar2000ParticipantAs I commented before (a long, long time ago, in another thread on a similar topic), although there were a couple of mal-contents calling for the resession itself, who don’t speak for the majority, most of us simply wanted a return to the normal level of affordability of housing. Now, if correcting the said cost inbalance requires a resession, then there simply is no other choice, but the balance must return one way or another. The inbalance was simply unsustainable and was a bubble waiting to burst.
Now that it has begun, it is bursting in a big way, and in some ways faster and more dramatically than most of us figured it would, and it certainly is no fun when a job loss or other calamity hist close to home, but if you’re realilstic you’ll agree that this correction is necessary and was inevitable.
So, to the end of restoring the inbalance — I say Bring it On — all the while smirking to myself because it matters not what I say, because the market will correct itself no matter what and there is not a thing that anyone can do about it, just like it has every single time in the past. As big as this inbalance was, so will the correction be…messy and unrelenting in its fury, wreacking everything in its path. Those who are to survive will learn to ride the wave, or get out of its way, because attempting to fight it is utter foolishness.
November 15, 2008 at 1:58 AM #304916CA renterParticipantI totally understand where you are coming from, jp.
We’ve been renting for over four years, paying rent in advance and making repairs ourselves, just trying to be model renters so the LL wouldn’t raise our rent.
All this time, the FBs have been living rent-free for many months or years, and now the politicians are crying about how they are “victims” who need to be bailed out.
Yes, it’s absolutely disgusting, and it punishes those who did the right thing in order to “help” those who were trying to scam the system.
This whole bailout nonsense sucks! π
November 15, 2008 at 1:58 AM #305282CA renterParticipantI totally understand where you are coming from, jp.
We’ve been renting for over four years, paying rent in advance and making repairs ourselves, just trying to be model renters so the LL wouldn’t raise our rent.
All this time, the FBs have been living rent-free for many months or years, and now the politicians are crying about how they are “victims” who need to be bailed out.
Yes, it’s absolutely disgusting, and it punishes those who did the right thing in order to “help” those who were trying to scam the system.
This whole bailout nonsense sucks! π
November 15, 2008 at 1:58 AM #305294CA renterParticipantI totally understand where you are coming from, jp.
We’ve been renting for over four years, paying rent in advance and making repairs ourselves, just trying to be model renters so the LL wouldn’t raise our rent.
All this time, the FBs have been living rent-free for many months or years, and now the politicians are crying about how they are “victims” who need to be bailed out.
Yes, it’s absolutely disgusting, and it punishes those who did the right thing in order to “help” those who were trying to scam the system.
This whole bailout nonsense sucks! π
November 15, 2008 at 1:58 AM #305313CA renterParticipantI totally understand where you are coming from, jp.
We’ve been renting for over four years, paying rent in advance and making repairs ourselves, just trying to be model renters so the LL wouldn’t raise our rent.
All this time, the FBs have been living rent-free for many months or years, and now the politicians are crying about how they are “victims” who need to be bailed out.
Yes, it’s absolutely disgusting, and it punishes those who did the right thing in order to “help” those who were trying to scam the system.
This whole bailout nonsense sucks! π
November 15, 2008 at 1:58 AM #305371CA renterParticipantI totally understand where you are coming from, jp.
We’ve been renting for over four years, paying rent in advance and making repairs ourselves, just trying to be model renters so the LL wouldn’t raise our rent.
All this time, the FBs have been living rent-free for many months or years, and now the politicians are crying about how they are “victims” who need to be bailed out.
Yes, it’s absolutely disgusting, and it punishes those who did the right thing in order to “help” those who were trying to scam the system.
This whole bailout nonsense sucks! π
November 15, 2008 at 8:30 AM #304988SD RealtorParticipantpr was swamped yesterday and have to take the kids to a bday party this morning. will answer later this afternoon.
ps – I absolutely wish I would have done what you recommended. basically flip homes during the 2003-2005 bubble years with no money down. I didn’t though cuz I kept incorrectly thinking we were at the top of the market each of those years.
what a boob I was!
November 15, 2008 at 8:30 AM #305352SD RealtorParticipantpr was swamped yesterday and have to take the kids to a bday party this morning. will answer later this afternoon.
ps – I absolutely wish I would have done what you recommended. basically flip homes during the 2003-2005 bubble years with no money down. I didn’t though cuz I kept incorrectly thinking we were at the top of the market each of those years.
what a boob I was!
November 15, 2008 at 8:30 AM #305364SD RealtorParticipantpr was swamped yesterday and have to take the kids to a bday party this morning. will answer later this afternoon.
ps – I absolutely wish I would have done what you recommended. basically flip homes during the 2003-2005 bubble years with no money down. I didn’t though cuz I kept incorrectly thinking we were at the top of the market each of those years.
what a boob I was!
November 15, 2008 at 8:30 AM #305383SD RealtorParticipantpr was swamped yesterday and have to take the kids to a bday party this morning. will answer later this afternoon.
ps – I absolutely wish I would have done what you recommended. basically flip homes during the 2003-2005 bubble years with no money down. I didn’t though cuz I kept incorrectly thinking we were at the top of the market each of those years.
what a boob I was!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.